Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison and Correlation of Retinal Sensitivity Between Microperimetry and Standard Automated Perimetry in Low-tension Glaucoma.
Tepelus, Tudor C; Song, Sheena; Nittala, Muneeswar G; Nassisi, Marco; Sadda, SriniVas R; Chopra, Vikas.
Afiliação
  • Tepelus TC; Doheny Image Reading Center, Doheny Eye Institute.
  • Song S; Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Nittala MG; Doheny Image Reading Center, Doheny Eye Institute.
  • Nassisi M; Doheny Image Reading Center, Doheny Eye Institute.
  • Sadda SR; Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Chopra V; Doheny Image Reading Center, Doheny Eye Institute.
J Glaucoma ; 29(10): 975-980, 2020 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32649448
ABSTRACT
PRéCIS Our study demonstrated that in low-tension glaucoma (LTG) patients, Microperimeter-3 (MP-3)-derived and Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA)-derived retinal sensitivities were similar and strongly correlated, allowing the respective data to be interrelated.

PURPOSE:

To compare and correlate retinal sensitivities obtained by Nidek MP-3 with those obtained from the HFA in eyes with LTG. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

In this prospective comparative study, 45 eyes of 24 LTG patients underwent retinal sensitivity assessments using the MP-3 (Nidek Technologies) and the HFA (Carl Zeiss Meditec) at the UCLA-Doheny Eye Center. Global and pointwise retinal sensitivity measurements were compared and correlated between the 2 devices.

RESULTS:

No statistically significant differences (P=0.85) were noted between the mean retinal sensitivities determined by each device (MP-3 26.33±4.31 dB; range, 13.05 to 31.60 vs. HFA 26.42±3.98 dB; range, 17.17 to 30.96), and a strong correlation (r=0.66, P<0.001) was noted for retinal sensitivity measurements. In addition, moderate to strong correlations were observed between the mean retinal sensitivity derived by MP-3 versus HFA-derived mean deviation (r=0.57, P<0.001), as well as, the pattern standard deviation (r=0.67, P<0.001). The intraclass correlation coefficient was excellent (ICC=0.80, 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.89), while the Bland-Altman analysis showed good agreement between the 2 devices with respect to retinal sensitivity.

CONCLUSION:

Retinal sensitivity measurements obtained by the MP-3 microperimetry instrument and the standard automated HFA perimeter were similar and highly correlated in patients with LTG. Given the potential benefits of microperimetry technology such as auto-eye-tracking and potentially more precise structure-function correlations, the use of microperimetry to monitor visual function in glaucoma management warrants further consideration.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Retina / Transtornos da Visão / Campos Visuais / Glaucoma de Baixa Tensão Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Glaucoma Assunto da revista: OFTALMOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Retina / Transtornos da Visão / Campos Visuais / Glaucoma de Baixa Tensão Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Glaucoma Assunto da revista: OFTALMOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article
...