Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Value of laboratory results in addition to vital signs in a machine learning algorithm to predict in-hospital cardiac arrest: A single-center retrospective cohort study.
Ueno, Ryo; Xu, Liyuan; Uegami, Wataru; Matsui, Hiroki; Okui, Jun; Hayashi, Hiroshi; Miyajima, Toru; Hayashi, Yoshiro; Pilcher, David; Jones, Daryl.
Afiliação
  • Ueno R; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan.
  • Xu L; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Center, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Uegami W; Department of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Matsui H; Department of Computer Science, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Okui J; Anatomical Pathology, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan.
  • Hayashi H; Clinical Research Support Division, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan.
  • Miyajima T; Post-Graduate Education Center, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan.
  • Hayashi Y; Post-Graduate Education Center, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan.
  • Pilcher D; Post-Graduate Education Center, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan.
  • Jones D; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan.
PLoS One ; 15(7): e0235835, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32658901
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Although machine learning-based prediction models for in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) have been widely investigated, it is unknown whether a model based on vital signs alone (Vitals-Only model) can perform similarly to a model that considers both vital signs and laboratory results (Vitals+Labs model).

METHODS:

All adult patients hospitalized in a tertiary care hospital in Japan between October 2011 and October 2018 were included in this study. Random forest models with/without laboratory results (Vitals+Labs model and Vitals-Only model, respectively) were trained and tested using chronologically divided datasets. Both models use patient demographics and eight-hourly vital signs collected within the previous 48 hours. The primary and secondary outcomes were the occurrence of IHCA in the next 8 and 24 hours, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used as a comparative measure. Sensitivity analyses were performed under multiple statistical assumptions.

RESULTS:

Of 141,111 admitted patients (training data 83,064, test data 58,047), 338 had an IHCA (training data 217, test data 121) during the study period. The Vitals-Only model and Vitals+Labs model performed comparably when predicting IHCA within the next 8 hours (Vitals-Only model vs Vitals+Labs model, AUC = 0.862 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.855-0.868] vs 0.872 [95% CI 0.867-0.878]) and 24 hours (Vitals-Only model vs Vitals+Labs model, AUC = 0.830 [95% CI 0.825-0.835] vs 0.837 [95% CI 0.830-0.844]). Both models performed similarly well on medical, surgical, and ward patient data, but did not perform well for intensive care unit patients.

CONCLUSIONS:

In this single-center study, the machine learning model predicted IHCAs with good discrimination. The addition of laboratory values to vital signs did not significantly improve its overall performance.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aprendizado de Máquina / Parada Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aprendizado de Máquina / Parada Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão
...