Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of the diagnostic sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein and glycoprotein-based antibody tests.
Schnurra, Carolin; Reiners, Nina; Biemann, Ronald; Kaiser, Thorsten; Trawinski, Henning; Jassoy, Christian.
Afiliação
  • Schnurra C; Institute for Virology, University Clinics and Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Reiners N; Institute for Virology, University Clinics and Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Biemann R; Institute for Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, University Clinics and Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Kaiser T; Institute for Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, University Clinics and Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Trawinski H; Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Department of Medicine, University Clinics and Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Jassoy C; Institute for Virology, University Clinics and Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. Electronic address: Christian.jassoy@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
J Clin Virol ; 129: 104544, 2020 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32663788
The emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS CoV-2) has been followed by the rapid development of antibody tests. To assess the utility of the tests for clinical use and seroepidemiologic studies, we examined the sensitivity of commercial antibody tests from Roche, Abbott, Novatec, Virotech Siemens, Euroimmun, and Mediagnost in a prospective diagnostic study. The tests were evaluated with 73 sera from SARS CoV-2 RNA positive individuals with mild to moderate disease or asymptomatic infection. Sera were obtained at 2-3 weeks (N = 25) or > 4 weeks (N = 48) after symptom onset and viral RNA test. The overall sensitivity of the tests ranged from 64.4-93.2%. The most sensitive assays recognized 95.8-100 % of the sera obtained after 4 weeks or later. Sera drawn at 2-3 weeks were recognized with lower sensitivity indicating that the optimal time point for serologic testing is later than 3 weeks after onset of the disease. Nucleoprotein- and glycoproteinbased assays had similar sensitivity indicating that tests with both antigens are suitable for serological diagnostics. Breakdown of the test results showed that nucleoprotein- and glycoprotein-based tests of comparable sensitivity reacted with different sets of sera. The observation indicates that a combination of nucleoprotein- and glycoprotein-based tests would increase the percentage of positive results.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pneumonia Viral / Testes Sorológicos / Proteínas Estruturais Virais / Infecções por Coronavirus / Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico / Betacoronavirus / Anticorpos Antivirais / Antígenos Virais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Virol Assunto da revista: VIROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pneumonia Viral / Testes Sorológicos / Proteínas Estruturais Virais / Infecções por Coronavirus / Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico / Betacoronavirus / Anticorpos Antivirais / Antígenos Virais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Virol Assunto da revista: VIROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha
...