Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Applying the Global Trigger Tool in German Hospitals: A Pilot in Surgery and Neurosurgery.
Brösterhaus, Mareen; Hammer, Antje; Kalina, Steffen; Grau, Stefan; Roeth, Anjali A; Ashmawy, Hany; Groß, Thomas; Binnebösel, Marcel; Knoefel, Wolfram Trudo; Manser, Tanja.
Afiliação
  • Brösterhaus M; From the Institute for Patient Safety, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn.
  • Hammer A; From the Institute for Patient Safety, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn.
  • Grau S; Center of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne.
  • Roeth AA; Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen.
  • Ashmawy H; Heinrich-Heine-Universität und Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Chirurgische Klinik (A), Duesseldorf, Germany.
  • Groß T; Central Division Medical Synergies.
  • Binnebösel M; Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen.
  • Knoefel WT; Heinrich-Heine-Universität und Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Chirurgische Klinik (A), Duesseldorf, Germany.
  • Manser T; FHNW School of Applied Psychology, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Olten, Switzerland.
J Patient Saf ; 16(4): e340-e351, 2020 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33215895
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the feasibility and potential of the Global Trigger Tool (GTT) for identifying adverse events (AEs) in different specialties in German hospitals. METHODS: A total of 120 patient records were randomly selected from two surgical and one neurosurgery departments of three university hospitals in Germany for a period of 2 months per department between January and July 2017. The records were reviewed using an adaptation of the German version of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement GTT. RESULTS: Thirty-nine records (32.5%) contained at least one AE. A total of 53 AEs were found in these 39 records. The incidences of AEs were 18.9% and 35.9% in the two surgical departments and 45.3% in neurosurgery. This corresponded to AE rates of 25.5 to 72.1 per 1000 patient-days and from 25.0 to 60.0 per 100 admissions across the three departments. A total of 71.7% of all identified AEs resulted in temporary harm (category E), 26.4% in temporary harm, requiring prolonged hospitalization (category F), and 1.9% in permanent patient harm. We also identified practical challenges, such as the necessary adaptation of the GTT relative to the respective department. CONCLUSIONS: The application of the GTT is feasible and represents an effective instrument for quality measurement when adapted to the departmental specifics. The trigger detection with the GTT is a valuable addition for proactive analyses of high-risk processes.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gestão de Riscos / Cirurgia Geral / Erros Médicos / Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde / Segurança do Paciente / Neurocirurgia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Patient Saf Assunto da revista: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gestão de Riscos / Cirurgia Geral / Erros Médicos / Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde / Segurança do Paciente / Neurocirurgia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Patient Saf Assunto da revista: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article
...