Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical relevance assessment of animal preclinical research (RAA) tool: development and explanation.
Gurusamy, Kurinchi S; Moher, David; Loizidou, Marilena; Ahmed, Irfan; Avey, Marc T; Barron, Carly C; Davidson, Brian; Dwek, Miriam; Gluud, Christian; Jell, Gavin; Katakam, Kiran; Montroy, Joshua; McHugh, Timothy D; Osborne, Nicola J; Ritskes-Hoitinga, Merel; van Laarhoven, Kees; Vollert, Jan; Lalu, Manoj.
Afiliação
  • Gurusamy KS; Research Department of Surgical Biotechnology, University College London, London, England, UK.
  • Moher D; Surgery and Interventional Trials Unit, University College London, London, England, UK.
  • Loizidou M; Centre for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
  • Ahmed I; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
  • Avey MT; Research Department of Surgical Biotechnology, University College London, London, England, UK.
  • Barron CC; Department of Surgery, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.
  • Davidson B; Centre for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
  • Dwek M; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
  • Gluud C; Centre for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
  • Jell G; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
  • Katakam K; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
  • Montroy J; Research Department of Surgical Biotechnology, University College London, London, England, UK.
  • McHugh TD; School of Life Sciences, University of Westminster, London, England, UK.
  • Osborne NJ; Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copehagen, Denmark.
  • Ritskes-Hoitinga M; Research Department of Surgical Biotechnology, University College London, London, England, UK.
  • van Laarhoven K; Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copehagen, Denmark.
  • Vollert J; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Blueprint Translational Research Group, Clinical Epidemiology and Regenerative Medicine Programs, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa Hospital, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
  • Lalu M; UCL Centre for Clinical Microbiology, Division of Infection & Immunity, University College London, London, England, UK.
PeerJ ; 9: e10673, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33569250
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Only a small proportion of preclinical research (research performed in animal models prior to clinical trials in humans) translates into clinical benefit in humans. Possible reasons for the lack of translation of the results observed in preclinical research into human clinical benefit include the design, conduct, and reporting of preclinical studies. There is currently no formal domain-based assessment of the clinical relevance of preclinical research. To address this issue, we have developed a tool for the assessment of the clinical relevance of preclinical studies, with the intention of assessing the likelihood that therapeutic preclinical findings can be translated into improvement in the management of human diseases.

METHODS:

We searched the EQUATOR network for guidelines that describe the design, conduct, and reporting of preclinical research. We searched the references of these guidelines to identify further relevant publications and developed a set of domains and signalling questions. We then conducted a modified Delphi-consensus to refine and develop the tool. The Delphi panel members included specialists in evidence-based (preclinical) medicine specialists, methodologists, preclinical animal researchers, a veterinarian, and clinical researchers. A total of 20 Delphi-panel members completed the first round and 17 members from five countries completed all three rounds.

RESULTS:

This tool has eight domains (construct validity, external validity, risk of bias, experimental design and data analysis plan, reproducibility and replicability of methods and results in the same model, research integrity, and research transparency) and a total of 28 signalling questions and provides a framework for researchers, journal editors, grant funders, and regulatory authorities to assess the potential clinical relevance of preclinical animal research.

CONCLUSION:

We have developed a tool to assess the clinical relevance of preclinical studies. This tool is currently being piloted.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: PeerJ Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: PeerJ Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido
...