Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use of dried blood spot samples for SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection using the Roche Elecsys ® high throughput immunoassay.
Mulchandani, Ranya; Brown, Ben; Brooks, Tim; Semper, Amanda; Machin, Nicholas; Linley, Ezra; Borrow, Ray; Wyllie, David.
Afiliação
  • Mulchandani R; Field Service, Public Health England, United Kingdom; UK Field Epidemiology Training Programme, Public Health England, United Kingdom. Electronic address: ranya.mulchandani@phe.gov.uk.
  • Brown B; Public Health Laboratory Manchester, Public Health England, United Kingdom.
  • Brooks T; Porton Down, Public Health England, United Kingdom.
  • Semper A; Porton Down, Public Health England, United Kingdom.
  • Machin N; Public Health Laboratory Manchester, Public Health England, United Kingdom.
  • Linley E; Public Health Laboratory Manchester, Public Health England, United Kingdom.
  • Borrow R; Public Health Laboratory Manchester, Public Health England, United Kingdom.
  • Wyllie D; Field Service, Public Health England, United Kingdom.
J Clin Virol ; 136: 104739, 2021 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33588354
Dried blood spot samples (DBS) provide an alternative sample type to venous blood samples for antibody testing. DBS are used by NHS for diagnosing Hepatitis C and by Public Health England for large scale HIV and Hepatitis C serosurveillance; the applicability of DBS based approaches for SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection is uncertain. The study aimed to compare antibody detection in DBS eluates using the Roche Elecsys ® immunoassay with antibody detection in paired plasma samples, using the same assay. The study was in one Police and one Fire & Rescue facility in England; it comprised of 195 participants within a larger sample COVID-19 serodiagnostics study of keyworkers, EDSAB-HOME. Outcome measures were sensitivity and specificity of DBS (the index test) relative to plasma (the reference test), at an experimental cut-off; quality of DBS sample collected; estimates of relative sensitivity of DBS vs. plasma immunoassay in a larger population. 18/195 (9.2%) participants tested positive using plasma samples. DBS sample quality varied markedly by phlebotomist, and low sample volume significantly reduced immunoassay signals. Using an experimental cut-off, sensitivity and specificity of DBS were 89.0% (95% CI 67.2, 96.9%) and 100.0% (95% CI 97.9, 100%) respectively compared with using plasma. The limit of detection for DBS is about 30 times higher than for plasma. DBS use for SARS-CoV-2 serology, though feasible, is insensitive relative to immunoassays on plasma. Sample quality impacts on assay performance. Alternatives, including the collection of capillary blood samples, should be considered for screening programs.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Contexto em Saúde: 4_TD Problema de saúde: 4_pneumonia Assunto principal: Teste em Amostras de Sangue Seco / Teste Sorológico para COVID-19 / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 / Anticorpos Antivirais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Virol Assunto da revista: VIROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Contexto em Saúde: 4_TD Problema de saúde: 4_pneumonia Assunto principal: Teste em Amostras de Sangue Seco / Teste Sorológico para COVID-19 / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 / Anticorpos Antivirais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Virol Assunto da revista: VIROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article
...