Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Treatment of Paranasal Sinus Fungus Ball: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Fadda, Gian Luca; Allevi, Fabiana; Rosso, Cecilia; Martino, Federica; Pipolo, Carlotta; Cavallo, Giovanni; Felisati, Giovanni; Saibene, Alberto Maria.
Afiliação
  • Fadda GL; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy.
  • Allevi F; ISGOS, The Italian Study Group on Odontogenic Sinusitis.
  • Rosso C; ISGOS, The Italian Study Group on Odontogenic Sinusitis.
  • Martino F; Department of Health Sciences, Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, Santi Paolo e Carlo Hospital, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
  • Pipolo C; Department of Health Sciences, Otolaryngology Unit, Santi Paolo e Carlo Hospital, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
  • Cavallo G; Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Unit of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
  • Felisati G; ISGOS, The Italian Study Group on Odontogenic Sinusitis.
  • Saibene AM; Department of Health Sciences, Otolaryngology Unit, Santi Paolo e Carlo Hospital, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 130(11): 1302-1310, 2021 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33733891
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Paranasal sinus fungus ball is a common non-invasive mycosis with excellent long-term surgical treatment results. The present systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken to define current treatment concepts and success rates in paranasal sinus fungus ball treatment.

METHODS:

Systematic searches were performed in multiple databases with criteria designed to include all studies published until May 2020 focusing on paranasal sinuses fungus ball treatment in humans. We selected studies including at least 10 patients, specifying treatment modalities, providing a minimum 6-month follow-up, and objectivating treatment success. After duplicate removal, abstract and full-text selection, and quality assessment, we reviewed eligible articles for treatment modalities and success rates. Success rates were pooled in a random effect meta-analysis and compared according to the use of intraoperative sinus lavages and postoperative antibiotics.

RESULTS:

Among 740 unique citations, 14 studies were deemed eligible. Most (n = 11) were retrospective case series. All studies relied on endoscopic sinus surgery. Intraoperative lavages were proposed in 10 studies and postoperative antibiotics in 7 (for all patients in 5 studies and for selected patients in 2). No significant heterogeneity was observed between results (Cochran's Q P = .639, I2 test = 0). Treatment success rate was 98.4% (95% confidence interval 97.4%-99.3%). Intraoperative sinus toilette and postoperative antibiotics didn't significantly improve the success rate.

CONCLUSION:

Endoscopic sinus surgery shows excellent results in fungus ball treatment. Further prospective studies might help further reducing antibiotics prescriptions in these patients and improve their management.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças dos Seios Paranasais / Assistência Perioperatória / Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural / Micoses Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças dos Seios Paranasais / Assistência Perioperatória / Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural / Micoses Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália
...