Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A scoping review of practice recommendations for clinicians' communication of uncertainty.
Medendorp, Niki M; Stiggelbout, Anne M; Aalfs, Cora M; Han, Paul K J; Smets, Ellen M A; Hillen, Marij A.
Afiliação
  • Medendorp NM; Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Stiggelbout AM; Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Aalfs CM; Division of Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Han PKJ; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center Research Institute, Portland, ME, USA.
  • Smets EMA; Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Hillen MA; Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Health Expect ; 24(4): 1025-1043, 2021 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34101951
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Health-care providers increasingly have to discuss uncertainty with patients. Awareness of uncertainty can affect patients variably, depending on how it is communicated. To date, no overview existed for health-care professionals on how to discuss uncertainty.

OBJECTIVE:

To generate an overview of available recommendations on how to communicate uncertainty with patients during clinical encounters. SEARCH STRATEGY A scoping review was conducted. Four databases were searched following the PRISMA-ScR statement. Independent screening by two researchers was performed of titles and abstracts, and subsequently full texts. INCLUSION CRITERIA Any (non-)empirical papers were included describing recommendations for any health-care provider on how to orally communicate uncertainty to patients. DATA EXTRACTION Data on provided recommendations and their characteristics (eg, target group and strength of evidence base) were extracted. Recommendations were narratively synthesized into a comprehensible overview for clinical practice.

RESULTS:

Forty-seven publications were included. Recommendations were based on empirical findings in 23 publications. After narrative synthesis, 13 recommendations emerged pertaining to three overarching goals (a) preparing for the discussion of uncertainty, (b) informing patients about uncertainty and (c) helping patients deal with uncertainty. DISCUSSION AND

CONCLUSIONS:

A variety of recommendations on how to orally communicate uncertainty are available, but most lack an evidence base. More substantial research is needed to assess the effects of the suggested communicative approaches. Until then, health-care providers may use our overview of communication strategies as a toolbox to optimize communication about uncertainty with patients. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Results were presented to stakeholders (physicians) to check and improve their practical applicability.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos / Comunicação Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Health Expect Assunto da revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE / SAUDE PUBLICA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos / Comunicação Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Health Expect Assunto da revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE / SAUDE PUBLICA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda
...