Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis for pain in pancreatic cancer patients - a meta-analysis and systematic review.
Asif, Abuzar A; Walayat, Saqib K; Bechtold, Matthew L; Revanur, Vakya; Puli, Srinivas R.
Afiliação
  • Asif AA; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, IL, USA.
  • Walayat SK; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, IL, USA.
  • Bechtold ML; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
  • Revanur V; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, IL, USA.
  • Puli SR; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, IL, USA.
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect ; 11(4): 536-542, 2021 Jun 21.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34211665
ABSTRACT

Background:

Endoscopic ultrasound guided celiac plexus neurolysis (EUS- CPN) has been reported to be an effective way to help with pain in pancreatic cancer patient. The aim of our updated meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of pain relief in patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent EUS guided neurolysis.

Methods:

Pooled proportions were calculated using both Mantel-Haenszel method (fixed effects model) and DerSimonian Laird method (random effects model). The heterogeneity among studies was tested using Cochran's Q test based upon inverse variance weights

Results:

Initial search identified 176 reference articles, of which 34 were selected and reviewed in detail. Sixteen studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in this analysis. The mean age of patients undergoing neurolysis was 56.31 ± 19.72 years. Number of males, N = 563 (57.4%), was higher than the number of females, N = 417 (42.5%). The pooled proportion of patients who showed pain relief with EUS-guided neurolysis was 71% (95% CI = 68-74). Bias calculated using Begg-Mazumdar was not significant (p = 0.8). In a subgroup analysis, when comparing the central and bilateral techniques, the pooled proportion of patients with pain relief was 66% (95% CI = 61-71) and 57% (95% CI = 48-67), respectively.

Conclusions:

Our results show that EUS guided CPN could provide relief in as much as 70% of patients with central neurolysis technique having some edge over peripheral neurolysis. Further larger scale randomized controlled trials may further help to elaborate the efficacy of central vs peripheral neurolysis.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos
...