Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The efficacy and safety of flow-diverting device and coil embolization for intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis.
Guo, Z; Wang, K; Kadeer, K; Cheng, X-J; Aisha, M.
Afiliação
  • Guo Z; Xinjiang Medical University, Department of Neurosurgery 2; the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Xinjiang, China. guo17599790996@163.com.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 25(17): 5383-5391, 2021 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34533790
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of flow-diverting device (FDD) and coil embolization therapy (CET) in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms through a meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We comprehensively searched in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wan Fang, VIP databases, and China Biology Medicine disc (CBM) for eligible literature. Odds ratio (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were considered as effect measures. Statistical heterogeneity was tested by Cochran's Q statistic and I2 tests, and sensitivity analysis was used to evaluate the stability of research results. Publication bias was detected by funnel diagrams.

RESULTS:

A total of 888 patients from 9 studies were finally enrolled in our analysis. Through meta-analysis, the results showed that the aneurysm occlusion rate in the FDD group was significantly higher than that in the CET group (OR, 95% CI=1.68, 1.20 to 2.36, p=0.002), and the retreatment rate after aneurysm operation in the FDD group was significantly lower than that in the FDD group (OR, 95% CI=0.40, 0.22 to 0.74, p=0.003). There was no significant difference in the proportion of mRS score (0-2) between the two groups during postoperative follow-up (OR, 95% CI=0.63, 0.20 to 1.94, p=0.43). In terms of safety, there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications (OR, 95% CI=1.11, 0.68 to 1.81, p=0.67) and mortality (OR, 95% CI=1.35, 0.53 to 3.42) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Compared with CET, FDD has achieved satisfactory results in increasing the rate of aneurysm occlusion and reducing the rate of retreatment of intracranial aneurysms. There is no significant difference in security between FDD and CET, though. These findings are reported in this paper, but because of the limitations of the included study, they need to be further verified by well-designed multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCT).
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Contexto em Saúde: 6_ODS3_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Problema de saúde: 6_cardiovascular_diseases / 6_cerebrovascular_disease Assunto principal: Prótese Vascular / Aneurisma Intracraniano / Embolização Terapêutica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci Assunto da revista: FARMACOLOGIA / TOXICOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Contexto em Saúde: 6_ODS3_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Problema de saúde: 6_cardiovascular_diseases / 6_cerebrovascular_disease Assunto principal: Prótese Vascular / Aneurisma Intracraniano / Embolização Terapêutica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci Assunto da revista: FARMACOLOGIA / TOXICOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China
...