Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Beyond 5 years: a matched cohort of sleeve gastrectomy versus gastric bypass.
Blevins, Katherine S; Garcia, Luis; Forrester, Joseph D; Morton, John M; Azagury, Dan E.
Afiliação
  • Blevins KS; Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
  • Garcia L; Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
  • Forrester JD; Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
  • Morton JM; Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
  • Azagury DE; Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. Electronic address: dazagury@stanford.edu.
Surg Obes Relat Dis ; 18(6): 789-793, 2022 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35484048
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has demonstrated excellent short-term outcomes. However, existing studies suffer from loss to follow-up, and most long-term data focus on laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). This study compares weight loss in patients ≥5 years from LSG with that in matched patients who underwent LRYGB. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare long-term weight loss in patients undergoing LRYGB and LSG. SETTING: University hospital, United States. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent LSG before August 2012 with follow-up data ≥5 years. LSG patients were matched 1:1 with LRYGB patients by sex, age at surgery, and preoperative body mass index. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed with weight loss at the longest duration the primary outcome. RESULTS: One-hundred and sixty-five patients underwent LSG during the study period. Long-term follow-up data (≥5 years) were available for 85 patients (52%). There were no preoperative differences between those with and without follow-up data. Six LSG patients (7%) were excluded because they underwent reoperation that altered intestinal anatomy. Of the 79 patients remaining, 75 were matched with post-LRYGB patients. The average follow-up period was 6.4 years for LSG patients and 6.5 years for LRYGB patients (P = .08, not significant). Change in body mass index was 6.81 kg/m2 for LSG patients and 13.11 kg/m2 for LRYGB patients. Percentage of total body weight loss was 15.25% for LSG patients and 28.73% for LRYGB patients. Percentage of excess body weight loss was 37% for LSG patients and 67% for LRYGB patients (P < .0001). Weight loss for LSG patient follow-up in clinic versus outside the clinic was 46% versus 34% (P = .18, not significant). CONCLUSIONS: LSG is now the most common bariatric surgery in the United States. Long-term data are needed to confirm that observed short-term favorable outcomes are maintained. Recent studies have produced divergent results. We observed significantly less weight loss at ≥5 years in LSG patients compared with matched LRYGB patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obesidade Mórbida / Derivação Gástrica / Laparoscopia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Surg Obes Relat Dis Assunto da revista: METABOLISMO Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obesidade Mórbida / Derivação Gástrica / Laparoscopia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Surg Obes Relat Dis Assunto da revista: METABOLISMO Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article
...