Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance Analysis of Self-Collected Nasal and Oral Swabs for Detection of SARS-CoV-2.
Lim, Ho-Jae; Baek, Young-Hyun; Park, Min-Young; Yang, Jae-Hyun; Kim, Min-Jin; Sung, Nackmoon; Sohn, Yong-Hak; Lee, Sun-Hwa; Park, Jung-Eun; Yang, Yong-Jin.
Afiliação
  • Lim HJ; Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Seegene Medical Foundation, Seoul 04805, Korea.
  • Baek YH; Department of Integrative Biological Sciences & BK21 FOUR Educational Research Group for Age-Associated Disorder Control Technology, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Korea.
  • Park MY; Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Seegene Medical Foundation, Seoul 04805, Korea.
  • Yang JH; Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Seegene Medical Foundation, Seoul 04805, Korea.
  • Kim MJ; Paul F. Glenn Center for Biology of Aging Research, Department of Genetics, Blavatnik Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
  • Sung N; Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Seegene Medical Foundation, Seoul 04805, Korea.
  • Sohn YH; Clinical Research Institute, Seegene Medical Foundation, Seoul 04805, Korea.
  • Lee SH; Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Seegene Medical Foundation, Seoul 04805, Korea.
  • Park JE; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seegene Medical Foundation, Seoul 04805, Korea.
  • Yang YJ; Department of Integrative Biological Sciences & BK21 FOUR Educational Research Group for Age-Associated Disorder Control Technology, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Korea.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 12(10)2022 Sep 21.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36291968
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the third highly pathogenic human coronavirus and is rapidly transmitted by infected individuals regardless of their symptoms. During the COVID-19 pandemic, owing to the dearth of skilled healthcare workers (HCWs) to collect samples for early diagnosis, self-collection emerged as a viable alternative. To evaluate the reliability of self-collection, we compared the virus detection rate using 3990 self-collected swabs and HCW-collected swabs, procured from the same individuals and collected immediately after the self-collection. The results of multiplex reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction revealed that the viral load in the HCW-collected swabs was marginally (18.4-28.8 times) higher than that in self-collected swabs. Self-collection showed no significant difference in sensitivity and specificity from HCW-collection (κ = 0.87, McNemar's test; p = 0.19), indicating a comparable performance. These findings suggest that self-collected swabs are acceptable substitutes for HCW-collected swabs, and that their use improved the specimen screening efficiency and reduced the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among HCWs during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Problema de saúde: 1_recursos_humanos_saude Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: Diagnostics (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Problema de saúde: 1_recursos_humanos_saude Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: Diagnostics (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article
...