Unmet expectations about material properties delay perceptual decisions.

Based on our expectations about material properties, we can implicitly predict an object's future states, e.g., a wine glass falling down will break when it hits the ground. How these expectations affect relatively low-level perceptual decisions, however, has not been systematically studied previously. To seek an answer to this question, we conducted a behavioral experiment using animations of various familiar objects (e.g., key, wine glass, etc.) freely falling and hitting the ground. During a training session, participants first built expectations about the dynamic properties of those objects. Half of the participants (N = 28) built expectations consistent with their daily lives (e.g., a key bounces rigidly), whereas the other half learned an atypical behavior (e.g., a key wobbles). This was followed by experimental sessions, in which expectations were unmet in 20% of the trials. In both training and experimental sessions, the participant's task was to report whether the objects broke or not upon hitting the ground. Critically, a specific object always remained intact or broke - only the manner in which it did so differed. For example, a key could wobble or remain rigid but never break. We found that participants' reaction times were longer when expectations were unmet, not only for typical material behavior but also when those expectations were atypical and learned during the training session. Furthermore, we found an interplay between long-term and newly learned expectations. Overall, our results show that expectations about material properties can impact relatively low-level perceptual decision-making processes.