Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Screening and diagnostic breast MRI: how do they impact surgical treatment? Insights from the MIPA study.
Cozzi, Andrea; Di Leo, Giovanni; Houssami, Nehmat; Gilbert, Fiona J; Helbich, Thomas H; Álvarez Benito, Marina; Balleyguier, Corinne; Bazzocchi, Massimo; Bult, Peter; Calabrese, Massimo; Camps Herrero, Julia; Cartia, Francesco; Cassano, Enrico; Clauser, Paola; de Lima Docema, Marcos F; Depretto, Catherine; Dominelli, Valeria; Forrai, Gábor; Girometti, Rossano; Harms, Steven E; Hilborne, Sarah; Ienzi, Raffaele; Lobbes, Marc B I; Losio, Claudio; Mann, Ritse M; Montemezzi, Stefania; Obdeijn, Inge-Marie; Ozcan, Umit A; Pediconi, Federica; Pinker, Katja; Preibsch, Heike; Raya Povedano, José L; Rossi Saccarelli, Carolina; Sacchetto, Daniela; Scaperrotta, Gianfranco P; Schlooz, Margrethe; Szabó, Botond K; Taylor, Donna B; Ulus, Özden S; Van Goethem, Mireille; Veltman, Jeroen; Weigel, Stefanie; Wenkel, Evelyn; Zuiani, Chiara; Sardanelli, Francesco.
Afiliação
  • Cozzi A; Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Rodolfo Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
  • Di Leo G; Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Rodolfo Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
  • Houssami N; The Daffodil Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney (Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW), Sydney, Australia.
  • Gilbert FJ; Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • Helbich TH; Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Structural Preclinical Imaging, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Álvarez Benito M; Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain.
  • Balleyguier C; Department of Radiology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
  • Bazzocchi M; BioMaps (UMR1281), INSERM, CEA, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
  • Bult P; Institute of Radiology, Department of Medicine, Ospedale Universitario S. Maria della Misericordia, Università degli Studi di Udine, Udine, Italy.
  • Calabrese M; Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Camps Herrero J; Unit of Oncological and Breast Radiology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
  • Cartia F; Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitario de La Ribera, Alzira, Spain.
  • Cassano E; Unit of Breast Imaging, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Clauser P; Breast Imaging Division, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
  • de Lima Docema MF; Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Structural Preclinical Imaging, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Depretto C; Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Dominelli V; Unit of Breast Imaging, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Forrai G; Breast Imaging Division, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
  • Girometti R; Department of Radiology, MHEK Teaching Hospital, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Harms SE; Institute of Radiology, Department of Medicine, Ospedale Universitario S. Maria della Misericordia, Università degli Studi di Udine, Udine, Italy.
  • Hilborne S; Breast Center of Northwest Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
  • Ienzi R; Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • Lobbes MBI; Department of Radiology, Di.Bi.MED, Policlinico Universitario Paolo Giaccone, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
  • Losio C; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Mann RM; Department of Breast Radiology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
  • Montemezzi S; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Obdeijn IM; Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Ozcan UA; Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Pediconi F; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Pinker K; Unit of Radiology, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Preibsch H; Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Università degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
  • Raya Povedano JL; Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Structural Preclinical Imaging, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Rossi Saccarelli C; Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Sacchetto D; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Scaperrotta GP; Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain.
  • Schlooz M; Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Szabó BK; Kiwifarm S.r.l, La Morra, Italy.
  • Taylor DB; Disaster Medicine Service 118, ASL CN1, Saluzzo, Italy.
  • Ulus ÖS; CRIMEDIM, Research Center in Emergency and Disaster Medicine, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale "Amedeo Avogadro", Novara, Italy.
  • Van Goethem M; Unit of Breast Imaging, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Veltman J; Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Weigel S; Department of Radiology, Barking Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Wenkel E; Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
  • Zuiani C; Department of Radiology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia.
  • Sardanelli F; Unit of Radiology, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Eur Radiol ; 33(9): 6213-6225, 2023 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37138190
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To report mastectomy and reoperation rates in women who had breast MRI for screening (S-MRI subgroup) or diagnostic (D-MRI subgroup) purposes, using multivariable analysis for investigating the role of MRI referral/nonreferral and other covariates in driving surgical outcomes.

METHODS:

The MIPA observational study enrolled women aged 18-80 years with newly diagnosed breast cancer destined to have surgery as the primary treatment, in 27 centres worldwide. Mastectomy and reoperation rates were compared using non-parametric tests and multivariable analysis.

RESULTS:

A total of 5828 patients entered analysis, 2763 (47.4%) did not undergo MRI (noMRI subgroup) and 3065 underwent MRI (52.6%); of the latter, 2441/3065 (79.7%) underwent MRI with preoperative intent (P-MRI subgroup), 510/3065 (16.6%) D-MRI, and 114/3065 S-MRI (3.7%). The reoperation rate was 10.5% for S-MRI, 8.2% for D-MRI, and 8.5% for P-MRI, while it was 11.7% for noMRI (p ≤ 0.023 for comparisons with D-MRI and P-MRI). The overall mastectomy rate (first-line mastectomy plus conversions from conserving surgery to mastectomy) was 39.5% for S-MRI, 36.2% for P-MRI, 24.1% for D-MRI, and 18.0% for noMRI. At multivariable analysis, using noMRI as reference, the odds ratios for overall mastectomy were 2.4 (p < 0.001) for S-MRI, 1.0 (p = 0.957) for D-MRI, and 1.9 (p < 0.001) for P-MRI.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients from the D-MRI subgroup had the lowest overall mastectomy rate (24.1%) among MRI subgroups and the lowest reoperation rate (8.2%) together with P-MRI (8.5%). This analysis offers an insight into how the initial indication for MRI affects the subsequent surgical treatment of breast cancer. KEY POINTS • Of 3065 breast MRI examinations, 79.7% were performed with preoperative intent (P-MRI), 16.6% were diagnostic (D-MRI), and 3.7% were screening (S-MRI) examinations. • The D-MRI subgroup had the lowest mastectomy rate (24.1%) among MRI subgroups and the lowest reoperation rate (8.2%) together with P-MRI (8.5%). • The S-MRI subgroup had the highest mastectomy rate (39.5%) which aligns with higher-than-average risk in this subgroup, with a reoperation rate (10.5%) not significantly different to that of all other subgroups.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Radiol Assunto da revista: RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Radiol Assunto da revista: RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália
...