Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Numerical investigation of intra-abdominal pressure and spinal load-sharing upon the application of an abdominal belt.
Bernier, Emeric; Driscoll, Mark.
Afiliação
  • Bernier E; Musculoskeletal Biomechanics Research Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, 845 Sherbrooke St. W, Montréal, H3A 0G4, Québec, Canada; Orthopaedic Research Lab, Research Institute MUHC, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, H3G 1A4, Québec, Canada.
  • Driscoll M; Musculoskeletal Biomechanics Research Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, 845 Sherbrooke St. W, Montréal, H3A 0G4, Québec, Canada; Orthopaedic Research Lab, Research Institute MUHC, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, H3G 1A4, Québec, Canada. Electronic address: mark.driscoll@mcgill.ca.
J Biomech ; 161: 111863, 2023 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37977959
ABSTRACT
Chronic low back pain patients may experience spinal instability. Abdominal belts (ABs) have been shown to improve spine stability, trunk stiffness, and resiliency to spinal perturbations. However, research on the contributing mechanisms is inconclusive. ABs may increase intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and reduce paraspinal soft tissue contribution to spine stability without increasing spinal compressive loads. A finite element model (FEM) of the spine inclusive of the T1-S1 vertebrae, intervertebral discs (IVDs), ribcage, pelvis, soft tissues, and abdominal cavity, without active muscle forces was developed. An identical FEM with an AB was developed. Both FEMs underwent trunk flexion. Following validation, the models' intervertebral rotation (IVR), IAP, IVD pressure, and tensile stress in the multifidus (MF), erector spinae (ES), and thoracolumbar fascia (TLF) were compared. The inclusion of an AB resulted in a 3.8 kPa IAP increase, but a decreased average soft tissue tensile stress of 0.28 kPa. The TLF withstood the majority of tension being transferred across the paraspinal soft tissues (>70 %). The average IVR in the AB model decreased by 10 %, with the lumbar spine experiencing the largest reduction. The lumbar IVDs of the AB model likewise showed a 31 % reduction in average IVD pressure. Using an AB improved trunk bending stiffness, primarily in the lumbar spine. Wearing an AB had minimal effect on reducing tensile stress in theES. The skewed stress distribution towards the TLF suggests its large contribution to spine stability and the potential advantage in unloading the structure when wearing an AB, measured herein at8 %.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor Lombar / Músculos Abdominais Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Biomech Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor Lombar / Músculos Abdominais Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Biomech Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá
...