Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Costal Chondrocyte-Derived Pellet-Type Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Versus Microfracture for the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defects: A 5-Year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial.
Yoon, Kyoung-Ho; Lee, Jungsun; Park, Jae-Young.
Afiliação
  • Yoon KH; Department of Orthopedics, Kyung-Hee University Hospital, Kyung-Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee J; R&D Institute, Biosolution, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Park JY; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Am J Sports Med ; 52(2): 362-367, 2024 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38230875
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Costal chondrocyte-derived pellet-type autologous chondrocyte implantation (CCP-ACI) has been introduced as a new therapeutic option for the treatment of articular cartilage defects. We had previously conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing CCP-ACI versus microfracture at 1 year postoperatively.

PURPOSE:

To compare the efficacy and safety of CCP-ACI versus microfracture for the treatment of articular cartilage defects of the knee at 5 years postoperatively. STUDY

DESIGN:

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS:

This study describes the mean 5-year follow-up of a previously published prospective clinical trial. The previous prospective trial compared the results of CCP-ACI versus microfracture until 1 year of follow-up. Of the 30 patients who were included in the previous study, 25 were followed up for 5 years. Patients were evaluated based on clinical outcome scores (Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], and visual analog scale for pain), magnetic resonance imaging findings, and rates of treatment failure at last follow-up.

RESULTS:

The MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue) score in the CCP-ACI group was significantly higher than that in the microfracture group at 5 years (62.3 vs 26.7, respectively; P < .0001). The Lysholm score and KOOS score in the CCP-ACI group were significantly higher than those in the microfracture group at 5 years (84.5 vs 64.9, respectively, and 390.9 vs 303.0, respectively; P = .023 and P = .017, respectively). There was 1 case of treatment failure that occurred in the microfracture group.

CONCLUSION:

The present randomized controlled trial indicated that the results of both procedures clinically and statistically significantly improved at 1 and 5 years' follow-up in treating cartilage defects, but the results of CCP-ACI were superior to those of microfracture. Magnetic resonance imaging conducted at 1 year and 5 years after CCP-ACI revealed statistically significant superior structural integration with native cartilage tissue compared with microfracture. REGISTRATION NCT03545269 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cartilagem Articular / Fraturas de Estresse Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Sports Med / Am. j. sports med / American journal of sports medicine Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cartilagem Articular / Fraturas de Estresse Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Sports Med / Am. j. sports med / American journal of sports medicine Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article
...