Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A comparative analysis of radical cystectomy with perioperative chemotherapy, chemoradiation therapy, or systemic therapy in patients with clinically advanced node-positive bladder cancer (cN2/N3).
Garg, Harshit; Bhandari, Mukund; Dursun, Furkan; Liss, Michael A; Kaushik, Dharam; Svatek, Robert S; Mansour, Ahmed M.
Afiliação
  • Garg H; Department of Urology, University of Texas Health, San Antonio, TX, United States.
  • Bhandari M; Department of Population Health Science, University of Texas Health, San Antonio, TX, United States.
  • Dursun F; Department of Urology, University of Texas Health, San Antonio, TX, United States.
  • Liss MA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Health, San Antonio, TX, United States.
  • Kaushik D; Department of Urology, University of Texas Health San Antonio/MD Anderson Mays Cancer Center, San Antonio, TX, United States.
  • Svatek RS; Department of Urology, University of Texas Health, San Antonio, TX, United States.
  • Mansour AM; Department of Urology, University of Texas Health San Antonio/MD Anderson Mays Cancer Center, San Antonio, TX, United States.
Front Oncol ; 13: 1157880, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38273851
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

The management of non-metastatic clinically advanced lymph nodal (cN2/N3) bladder cancer (Stage IIIB) could involve radical cystectomy, chemoradiation, or systemic therapy alone. However, a definitive comparison between these approaches is lacking. This study aims to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection (RC-PLND), chemoradiation therapy (CRT) or systemic therapy (including immunotherapy) (ST) only in patients with stage IIIB bladder cancer. Materials and

methods:

A retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database for patients with stage IIIB urothelial bladder cancer was done from 2004-2019. Patients were classified as Group A Those who received RC-PLND with perioperative chemotherapy, Group B Those who received CRT, and Group C Those who received only ST alone. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Inverse probability weighting (IPW)-adjusted Kaplan Meier curves were utilized to compare overall survival (OS) and cox multivariate regression analysis was used to identify predictors for OS.

Results:

Overall, 2,575 patients were identified. They were classified into Group A (n=1,278), Group B (n=317) and Group C (n=980). Compared to Group B, patients in Group A were younger (SMD=19.6%), had lower comorbidities (SMD=18.2%), had higher income (SMD=31.5%), had private insurance (SMD= 26.7%), were treated at academic centres (SMD=29.3%) and had higher percentage of N2 disease (SMD=31.1%). Using IPW-adjusted survival analysis, compared to Group C, the median OS was significantly higher in Group A (20.7 vs 14.2 months, p<0.001) and Group B (19.7 vs 14.2 months, p<0.001) but similar between Group A and Group B (20.9 vs 19.7 months, p=0.74). Both surgery (HR=0.72 (0.65-0.80), p<0.001) and CRT (0.70 (0.59-0.82), p<0.001) appeared to be independent predictors for OS on cox-regression analysis. The major limitations include bias due to retrospective analysis and non-assessment of cancer-specific survival.

Conclusion:

In stage IIIB bladder cancer with advanced lymph nodal disease, both RC and CRT offer equivalent survival benefits and are superior to systemic therapy alone.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Oncol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Oncol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos
...