Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Unrecognized opportunities: The landscape of pediatric kidney-paired donation in the United States.
Verbesey, Jennifer; Thomas, Alvin G; Waterman, Amy D; Karhadkar, Sunil; Cassell, Victoria R; Segev, Dorry L; Hogan, Julien; Cooper, Matt.
Afiliação
  • Verbesey J; MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Thomas AG; Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Waterman AD; Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
  • Karhadkar S; Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Cassell VR; Department of Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Segev DL; Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Hogan J; Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
  • Cooper M; Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Pediatr Transplant ; 28(1): e14657, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38317337
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Pediatric (age < 18 years) kidney transplant (KT) candidates face increasingly complex choices. The 2014 kidney allocation system nearly doubled wait times for pediatric recipients. Given longer wait times and new ways to optimize compatibility, more pediatric candidates may consider kidney-paired donation (KPD). Motivated by this shift and the potential impact of innovations in KPD practice, we studied pediatric KPD procedures in the US from 2008 to 2021.

METHODS:

We describe the characteristics and outcomes of pediatric KPD recipients with comparison to pediatric non-KPD living donor kidney transplants (LDKT), pediatric LDKT recipients, and pediatric deceased donor (DDKT) recipients.

RESULTS:

Our study cohort includes 4987 pediatric DDKTs, 3447 pediatric non-KPD LDKTs, and 258 pediatric KPD transplants. Fewer centers conducted at least one pediatric KPD procedure compared to those that conducted at least one pediatric LDKT or DDKT procedure (67, 136, and 155 centers, respectively). Five centers performed 31% of the pediatric KPD transplants. After adjustment, there were no differences in graft failure or mortality comparing KPD recipients to non-KPD LDKT, LDKT, or DDKT recipients.

DISCUSSION:

We did not observe differences in transplant outcomes comparing pediatric KPD recipients to controls. Considering these results, KPD may be underutilized for pediatric recipients. Pediatric KT centers should consider including KPD in KT candidate education. Further research will be necessary to develop tools that could aid clinicians and families considering the time horizon for future KT procedures, candidate disease and histocompatibility characteristics, and other factors including logistics and donor protections.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Contexto em Saúde: 6_ODS3_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Problema de saúde: 6_kidney_renal_pelvis_ureter_cancer Assunto principal: Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos / Transplante de Rim Limite: Adolescent / Child / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Pediatr Transplant Assunto da revista: PEDIATRIA / TRANSPLANTE Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Contexto em Saúde: 6_ODS3_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Problema de saúde: 6_kidney_renal_pelvis_ureter_cancer Assunto principal: Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos / Transplante de Rim Limite: Adolescent / Child / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Pediatr Transplant Assunto da revista: PEDIATRIA / TRANSPLANTE Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos
...