Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Management of Advanced Peri-Implantitis by Guided Bone Regeneration in Combination with Trabecular Metal Fixtures, Two Months after Removal of the Failed Implants: Two-Year Results of a Single-Cohort Clinical Study.
Bianconi, Stefano; Romanos, Georgios; Testori, Tiziano; Del Fabbro, Massimo.
Afiliação
  • Bianconi S; Department of Oral Surgery and Dentistry, General Hospital, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.
  • Romanos G; Department of Periodontics and Endodontics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
  • Testori T; Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy.
  • Del Fabbro M; Department of Implantology and Oral Rehabilitation, Dental Clinic, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, 20157 Milan, Italy.
J Clin Med ; 13(3)2024 Jan 25.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38337407
ABSTRACT

Background:

Implant replacement is among the treatment options for severe peri-implantitis. The aim of this single-cohort study was to evaluate the feasibility of replacing compromised implants affected by advanced peri-implantitis with new implants with a porous trabecular metal (TM) structure. Materials and

Methods:

Patients with one or more implants in the posterior region showing a defect depth >50% of implant length, measured from the residual crest, were consecutively included. Two months after implant removal, patients received a TM implant combined with a xenograft and a resorbable membrane. The implant stability quotient (ISQ) was measured at placement and re-assessed five months later (at uncovering), then after 6, 12, and 24 months of function. Marginal bone loss was radiographically evaluated.

Results:

Twenty consecutive cases were included. One patient dropped out due to COVID-19 infection, and nineteen cases were evaluated up to 24 months. At placement, the mean ISQ was 53.08 ± 13.65 (standard deviation), which increased significantly to 69.74 ± 9.01 after five months of healing (p < 0.001) and to 78.00 ± 7.29 after six months of loading (p < 0.001). Thereafter, the ISQ remained stable for up to 24 months (80.55 ± 4.73). All implants successfully osseointegrated and were restored as planned. After two years, the average marginal bone level change was -0.41 ± 0.38 mm (95% confidence interval -0.60, -0.21), which was limited yet significantly different from the baseline (p < 0.05).

Conclusions:

The treatment of advanced peri-implant defects using TM implants inserted two months after explantation in combination with guided bone regeneration may achieve successful outcomes up to two years follow-up, even in the presence of low primary stability.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália
...