Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Examining crossover and postprotocol therapies in first-line immunotherapy trials in non-small cell lung cancer.
Desai, Aakash; Smith, Caleb J; Pritchett, Joshua C; Leventakos, Konstantinos; West, Howard Jack.
Afiliação
  • Desai A; Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
  • Smith CJ; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Pritchett JC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Leventakos K; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • West HJ; Summit Therapeutics, PLC, Menlo Park, California, USA.
Cancer ; 130(16): 2807-2811, 2024 Aug 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38353476
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has led to significant improvement in outcomes for patients with nononcogene-driven advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The rate of crossover and receipt of postprotocol ICI in frontline trials for advanced NSCLC has not been systematically evaluated.

METHODS:

ClinicalTrials.gov was used to identify phase 3 studies evaluating the use of immunotherapy or combination chemoimmunotherapy against chemotherapy alone in the frontline management of advanced NSCLC. Data on outcomes, rate of crossover and/or subsequent post-protocol receipt of immunotherapy, and the start dates of these clinical trials were then extracted.

RESULTS:

Twenty-three frontline trials in nononcogene-driven advanced NSCLC were identified. Six trials with ICI monotherapy/dual ICI therapy and 17 trials evaluating chemotherapy/ICI in first-line advanced NSCLC were included in the analysis. The crossover rate ranged 0% to 54% in ICI monotherapy/dual ICI trials and 0% to 52% in chemotherapy/ICI trials. Nineteen of 23 trials provided information on subsequent postprotocol therapies. Among the trials not allowing crossover, postprotocol ICI was administered to 17% to 45.8% of patients. Information regarding the eventual receipt of ICI therapy was available for 22 of 23 trials. Of 6631 patients, 2507 (37.8%) randomized to the control arm eventually received ICI therapy.

CONCLUSION:

The rate of crossover and postprotocol ICI use was low in frontline trials for first-line NSCLC incorporating ICI. Given the proven improved overall survival of ICI in a broad population, there is a need to ensure availability of this life-prolonging therapy in future trials, either by crossover treatment or postprotocol administration.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas / Estudos Cross-Over / Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico / Imunoterapia / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas / Estudos Cross-Over / Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico / Imunoterapia / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos
...