Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic value of Procalcitonin, C-reactive protein-to-lymphocyte ratio (CLR), C-reactive protein and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for predicting patients with Bacteraemia in the intensive care unit.
Zhang, Guo-Ming; Gu, Yuan-Yuan.
Afiliação
  • Zhang GM; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shuyang Hospital, The Affiliated Shuyang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Shuyang 223600, Jiangsu, China; Jiangsu Key Laboratory of New Drug Research and Clinical Pharmacy, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou 221004, Jiangsu, China. Electronic address: gm@xzhmu.edu.cn.
  • Gu YY; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shuyang Hospital, The Affiliated Shuyang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Shuyang 223600, Jiangsu, China.
J Crit Care ; 81: 154538, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38354622
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

To explore the diagnostic value of procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein-to-lymphocyte ratio (CLR), C-reactive protein (CRP) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for predicting patients with bacteremia in the intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS:

This case-control study included 359 patients with suspected bacteremia were divided into a bacteremia group (n = 152) and a control group (n = 207) from September 2018 to April 2023. Patient data were collected using a laboratory information system (LIS). ROC curves for PCT, CLR, CRP, and NLR in predicting patients with bacteremia.

RESULTS:

For PCT, CLR, CRP and NLR to predict patients with bacteremia in the ICU, the AUCs were 0.991(95%CI 0.974-0.998), 0.960(95%CI 0.935-0.978), 0.955(95%CI 0.928-0.974), and 0.898(95%CI0.862-0.927), respectively; the optimal thresholds were 0.248 ng/mL, 47.52 mg/109, 48.32 mg/L, and 6.51, respectively; the sensitivities were 95.4(95%CI 90.7-98.1), 88.2(95%CI 81.9-92.8), 87.5(95%CI 81.2-92.3), and 86.8(95%CI80.4-91.8), respectively; and the specificities were 95.7(95%CI 91.9-98.0), 90.8(95%CI 86.0-94.4), 90.3(95%CI 85.5-94.0), and 85.0(95%CI79.4-89.6), respectively. The sensitivities of PCT, CLR, CRP and NLR for predicting bacteremia due to E. coli infection are as high as over 90%, the specificity of PCT is 100, and the sensitivity of NLR is 100. The sensitivity of CRP for predicting bacteremia due to non-Enterobacer infection is 100.

CONCLUSIONS:

Compared with those in the control group, PCT, CLR, CRP and NLR were significantly greater in the bacteremia group. The PCT, CLR, CRP, and NLR can all predict the occurrence of bacteremia. The PCT had the highest sensitivity and specificity in predicting bacteremia in ICU patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Contexto em Saúde: 3_ND Problema de saúde: 3_neglected_diseases / 3_zoonosis Assunto principal: Bacteriemia / Pró-Calcitonina Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Crit Care Assunto da revista: TERAPIA INTENSIVA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Contexto em Saúde: 3_ND Problema de saúde: 3_neglected_diseases / 3_zoonosis Assunto principal: Bacteriemia / Pró-Calcitonina Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Crit Care Assunto da revista: TERAPIA INTENSIVA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article
...