Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evidence-based practice attitudes and nutrition support guideline knowledge between holders and nonholders of the Certified Nutrition Support Clinician credential.
Steiner, Lea; Sackey, Joachim; Cohen, Deborah; Brody, Rebecca.
Afiliação
  • Steiner L; Department of Clinical and Preventive Nutrition Sciences, School of Health Professions Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
  • Sackey J; Department of Clinical and Preventive Nutrition Sciences, School of Health Professions Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
  • Cohen D; Department of Clinical and Preventive Nutrition Sciences, School of Health Professions Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
  • Brody R; Department of Clinical and Preventive Nutrition Sciences, School of Health Professions Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
Nutr Clin Pract ; 39(4): 934-944, 2024 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38366972
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Clinical practice frequently changes, and professionals should stay abreast of evidence-based practice (EBP) guidelines. Negative attitudes towards EBP are a barrier to guideline adoption. This study explored EBP attitudes and knowledge of a complex nutrition support clinical case scenario of individuals holding or not holding the Certified Nutrition Support Clinician (CNSC) credential.

METHODS:

This cross-sectional study used an online survey sent to American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) members with and without the CNSC credential and all CNSC credential holders from the National Board of Nutrition Support Certification email list. The survey included the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale Score (EBPAS-15) and eight knowledge questions using a nutrition support case scenario. An independent samples t test compared knowledge and EBPAS-15 total scores and subscores between CNSC holders and nonholders. Pearson correlation determined the correlation between knowledge and EBPAS-15 scores.

RESULTS:

The response rate was 7.8% (N = 706). CNSC holders (n = 536) had significantly higher mean knowledge scores (4.7 ± 1.6 out of 8) than nonholders (n = 159, 4.1 ± 1.7) (P < 0.001). Total EBPAS-15 scores were not significantly different between CNSC holders (n = 542, 2.9 ± 0.4 out of 4) and nonholders (n = 164, 2.8 ± 0.7) (P = 0.434), and knowledge scores and total EBPAS-15 scores (P = 0.639) or subscores were not significantly correlated.

CONCLUSIONS:

Regardless of holding the CNSC credential, EBPAS-15 scores indicated respondents had positive EBP attitudes. CNSC holders had significantly higher knowledge scores of recent nutrition support EBP guidelines compared with non-CNSC credential holders. Positive EBP attitudes are a precursor to clinical decision-making, but future research should determine the use of guidelines in clinical practice.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Problema de saúde: 1_geracao_evidencia_conhecimento Assunto principal: Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde / Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde / Apoio Nutricional / Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Nutr Clin Pract Assunto da revista: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO / ENFERMAGEM Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Problema de saúde: 1_geracao_evidencia_conhecimento Assunto principal: Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde / Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde / Apoio Nutricional / Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Nutr Clin Pract Assunto da revista: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO / ENFERMAGEM Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos
...