Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Chemistry-albedo feedbacks offset up to a third of forestation's CO2 removal benefits.
Weber, James; King, James A; Abraham, Nathan Luke; Grosvenor, Daniel P; Smith, Christopher J; Shin, Youngsub Matthew; Lawrence, Peter; Roe, Stephanie; Beerling, David J; Martin, Maria Val.
Afiliação
  • Weber J; Leverhulme Centre for Climate Change Mitigation, School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
  • King JA; Leverhulme Centre for Climate Change Mitigation, School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
  • Abraham NL; Centre for Atmospheric Science, Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK.
  • Grosvenor DP; National Centre for Atmospheric Science, Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK.
  • Smith CJ; Centre for Environmental Modelling and Computation (CEMAC), School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
  • Shin YM; Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter EX1 3PB, UK.
  • Lawrence P; Institute for Climate and Atmospheric Science, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
  • Roe S; International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria.
  • Beerling DJ; Centre for Atmospheric Science, Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK.
  • Martin MV; NCAR Earth System Laboratory, Climate and Global Dynamics Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80307, USA.
Science ; 383(6685): 860-864, 2024 Feb 23.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38386743
ABSTRACT
Forestation is widely proposed for carbon dioxide (CO2) removal, but its impact on climate through changes to atmospheric composition and surface albedo remains relatively unexplored. We assessed these responses using two Earth system models by comparing a scenario with extensive global forest expansion in suitable regions to other plausible futures. We found that forestation increased aerosol scattering and the greenhouse gases methane and ozone following increased biogenic organic emissions. Additionally, forestation decreased surface albedo, which yielded a positive radiative forcing (i.e., warming). This offset up to a third of the negative forcing from the additional CO2 removal under a 4°C warming scenario. However, when forestation was pursued alongside other strategies that achieve the 2°C Paris Agreement target, the offsetting positive forcing was smaller, highlighting the urgency for simultaneous emission reductions.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Science Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Science Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido
...