Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The WHO Foundation in global health governance: Depoliticizing corporate philanthropy.
Ralston, Rob; Wagner-Rizvi, Tracey; van Schalkwyk, May Ci; Maani, Nason; Collin, Jeff.
Afiliação
  • Ralston R; Global Health Policy Unit, Social Policy, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, UK; SPECTRUM Consortium, UK. Electronic address: rob.ralston@ed.ac.uk.
  • Wagner-Rizvi T; Global Health Policy Unit, Social Policy, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, UK; SPECTRUM Consortium, UK.
  • van Schalkwyk MC; Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.
  • Maani N; Global Health Policy Unit, Social Policy, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, UK.
  • Collin J; Global Health Policy Unit, Social Policy, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, UK; SPECTRUM Consortium, UK.
Soc Sci Med ; 344: 116515, 2024 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38412806
ABSTRACT
The creation of the WHO Foundation during the COVID-19 pandemic represents a significant institutional development in the politics of financing the World Health Organization (WHO). In the context of longstanding acute financial pressures, the objective of the WHO Foundation is to widen WHO's resource base by attracting philanthropic donations from the commercial sector. In placing funding decisions 'at one remove' from WHO, the stated expectation is that the WHO Foundation will act as an intermediary, insulating the WHO from potential conflicts of interest and reputational risk through a combination of strategic distance from WHO and proximity with its norms and rules of engagement with non-state actors. Yet, whether this model has translated into practice remains understudied. In this article, we focus on emerging institutional practices within the WHO Foundation, highlighting a drift from its stated governance model. Based on analysis of WHO Foundation documents, we demonstrate how due diligence and transparency practices within the Foundation have been redesigned in ways that contradict or subvert its claims to applying alignment with WHO's governance norms, notably relating to its engagement with health harming industries such as alcohol and petrochemical companies. While this situation may seem paradoxical, we argue that, in placing funding decisions 'at one remove' from the formal institutions and structures of WHO, the creation of the Foundation has served to displace this issue to a more secluded arena where drifts in practice are less exposed to political oversight and scrutiny. Focusing on the discursive aspects of this process of depoliticisation, we contend that the Foundation has strategically managed 'fictional expectations' of accountable and transparent governance in order to mitigate concerns about its mandate and functions. This assessment provides new and important insights into the depoliticizing functions of the WHO Foundation and the significant implications this may have for global health governance.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Contexto em Saúde: 11_ODS3_cobertura_universal / 2_ODS3 Problema de saúde: 11_governance_arrangements / 11_multisectoral_coordination / 2_cobertura_universal Assunto principal: Saúde Global / Obtenção de Fundos Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Soc Sci Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Contexto em Saúde: 11_ODS3_cobertura_universal / 2_ODS3 Problema de saúde: 11_governance_arrangements / 11_multisectoral_coordination / 2_cobertura_universal Assunto principal: Saúde Global / Obtenção de Fundos Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Soc Sci Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article
...