Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of the efficacy of thoracolumbosacral and lumbosacral orthosis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in patients with major thoracolumbar or lumbar curves: a prospective controlled study.
Sha, Lin; Zhang, Tianyuan; Sui, Wenyuan; Fan, Qing; Yang, Jingfan; Deng, Yaolong; Huang, Zifang; Yang, Junlin.
Afiliação
  • Sha L; Department of Pediatric Orthopedics, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Zhang T; Spine Center, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Sui W; Spine Center, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Fan Q; Department of Pediatric Orthopedics, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Yang J; Spine Center, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Deng Y; Spine Center, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Huang Z; Department of Spine Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Yang J; Department of Pediatric Orthopedics, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Front Pediatr ; 12: 1368201, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38628358
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) is the most commonly used type of brace for the conservative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Although lumbosacral orthosis (LSO) is designed to correct single thoracolumbar or lumbar (TL/L) curves, its effectiveness remains underexplored. This novel article aims to compare the effectiveness of LSO with TLSO in treating AIS with main TL/L curves.

Methods:

This prospective controlled cohort study enrolled patients with AIS with main TL/L curves and minor thoracic curves who were treated with either TLSO or LSO. Demographic and radiographic data were compared between the two groups. Treatment outcomes were also assessed. Risk factors for minor curve progression were identified, and a cut-off value was determined within the LSO group.

Results:

Overall, 82 patients were recruited, including 44 in the TLSO group and 38 in the LSO group. The initial TL/L curves showed no difference between both groups. However, the baseline thoracic curves were significantly larger in the TLSO group compared to the LSO group (25.98° ± 7.47° vs. 18.71° ± 5.95°, P < 0.001). At the last follow-up, LSO demonstrated similar effectiveness to TLSO in treating TL/L curves but was less effective for thoracic curves. The initial magnitude of thoracic curves was identified as a risk factor for minor curve outcomes in the LSO group. The ROC curve analysis determined a cut-off value of 21° for thoracic curves to predict treatment outcomes.

Discussion:

In contrast to TLSO, LSO exhibits comparable effectiveness in treating main TL/L curves, making it a viable clinical option; however, it is less effective for thoracic minor curves. The initial magnitude of the minor thoracic curves may guide the selection of the appropriate brace type for patients with AIS with main TL/L curves.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Pediatr Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Pediatr Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China
...