Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The nexus of immigration regulation and health governance: a scoping review of the extent to which right to access healthcare by migrants, refugees and asylum seekers was upheld in the United Kingdom during COVID-19.
Van Hout, M C; Madroumi, R; Andrews, M D; Arnold, R; Hope, V D; Taegtmeyer, M.
Afiliação
  • Van Hout MC; School of Public and Allied Health, Faculty of Health, Liverpool John Moores University, UK. Electronic address: m.c.vanhout@ljmu.ac.uk.
  • Madroumi R; School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Liverpool John Moores University, UK. Electronic address: R.Madroumi@2020.ljmu.ac.uk.
  • Andrews MD; Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Clinical Sciences and International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, UK. Electronic address: Dilys.Andrews@lstmed.ac.uk.
  • Arnold R; Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, UK. Electronic address: rosalyn.arnold@liverpool.ac.uk.
  • Hope VD; School of Public and Allied Health, Faculty of Health, Liverpool John Moores University, UK. Electronic address: V.D.Hope@ljmu.ac.uk.
  • Taegtmeyer M; Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Clinical Sciences and International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, UK. Electronic address: Miriam.Taegtmeyer@lstmed.ac.uk.
Public Health ; 232: 21-29, 2024 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728905
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Complementing the well-established evidence base on health inequalities experienced by migrants, refugees and asylum seekers in the UK; we examined the extent to which their right to equal non-discriminatory access to health services (promotive, preventive, curative) was upheld during the COVID-19 pandemic. STUDY

DESIGN:

Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework.

METHODS:

A comprehensive search was conducted on Medline, PubMed, and CINAHL using detailed MESH terms, for literature published between 01 January 2020 and 01 January 2024. The process was supported by a ten-page Google search and hand searching of reference lists. 42 records meeting the inclusion criteria were charted, coded inductively and analysed thematically in an integrated team-based approach.

RESULTS:

Dissonance between immigration regulation and health governance is illustrated in four themes Health systems leveraged to (re)enforce the hostile environment; Dissonance between health rights on paper and in practice; Structural failures to overcome communication and digital exclusion; and COVID-19 vaccine (in)equity exacerbated fear, mistrust and exclusion. Migrants, refugees and asylum seekers encountered substantial individual, structural and policy-level barriers to accessing healthcare in the UK during COVID-19. Insecure immigration status, institutional mistrust, data-sharing and charging fears, communication challenges and digital exclusion impacted heavily on their ability to access healthcare in an equitable non-discriminatory manner.

CONCLUSIONS:

An inclusive and innovative health equity and rights-based responses reaching all migrants, refugees and asylum seekers are warranted if the National Health Service is to live up to its promise of 'leaving no one behind' in post-pandemic and future responses.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Refugiados / Migrantes / COVID-19 / Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Public Health Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Refugiados / Migrantes / COVID-19 / Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Public Health Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article
...