Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Artificial Intelligence Support for Informal Patient Caregivers: A Systematic Review.
Borna, Sahar; Maniaci, Michael J; Haider, Clifton R; Gomez-Cabello, Cesar A; Pressman, Sophia M; Haider, Syed Ali; Demaerschalk, Bart M; Cowart, Jennifer B; Forte, Antonio Jorge.
Afiliação
  • Borna S; Division of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
  • Maniaci MJ; Division of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
  • Haider CR; Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
  • Gomez-Cabello CA; Division of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
  • Pressman SM; Division of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
  • Haider SA; Division of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
  • Demaerschalk BM; Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
  • Cowart JB; Center for Digital Health, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
  • Forte AJ; Division of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Bioengineering (Basel) ; 11(5)2024 May 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38790350
ABSTRACT
This study aims to explore how artificial intelligence can help ease the burden on caregivers, filling a gap in current research and healthcare practices due to the growing challenge of an aging population and increased reliance on informal caregivers. We conducted a search with Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and Web of Science, focusing on AI and caregiving. Our inclusion criteria were studies where AI supports informal caregivers, excluding those solely for data collection. Adhering to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we eliminated duplicates and screened for relevance. From 947 initially identified articles, 10 met our criteria, focusing on AI's role in aiding informal caregivers. These studies, conducted between 2012 and 2023, were globally distributed, with 80% employing machine learning. Validation methods varied, with Hold-Out being the most frequent. Metrics across studies revealed accuracies ranging from 71.60% to 99.33%. Specific methods, like SCUT in conjunction with NNs and LibSVM, showcased accuracy between 93.42% and 95.36% as well as F-measures spanning 93.30% to 95.41%. AUC values indicated model performance variability, ranging from 0.50 to 0.85 in select models. Our review highlights AI's role in aiding informal caregivers, showing promising results despite different approaches. AI tools provide smart, adaptive support, improving caregivers' effectiveness and well-being.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Bioengineering (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Bioengineering (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos
...