Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient Perceptions of Standardized Risk Language Used in American College of Radiology Prostate MRI PIRADS Scores.
Dallmer, Jeremiah R; Luu, Michael; Saouaf, Rola; Spiegel, Brennan; Freedland, Stephen J; Daskivich, Timothy J.
Afiliação
  • Dallmer JR; Resident, Department of Urology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Luu M; Staff Biostatistician, Department of Biostatistics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Saouaf R; Professor of Radiology, Department of Imaging, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Spiegel B; Professor of Medicine and Public Health, George and Dorothy Gourrich Chair in Digital Health Ethics, Director of Health Services Research, Cedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education (CS-CORE), Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Freedland SJ; Professor of Urology, Warschaw Robertson, and Law Families Chair in Prostate Cancer, Director, Center for Integrated Research in Cancer and Lifestyle (CIRCL), Associate Director of Education and Training for Cedars-Sinai Cancer, Department of Urology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Daskivich TJ; Assistant Professor of Urology, Director of Academic Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA. Electronic address: Timothy.Daskivich@csmc.edu.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 2024 Jun 14.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38880288
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Prostate MRI reports utilize standardized language to describe risk of clinically significant prostate cancer(csPCa) from "equivocal"(PI-RADS 3), "likely"(PI-RADS 4), to "highly-likely"(PI-RADS 5). These terms correspond to risks of 11%, 37%, and 70% according to AUA guidelines, respectively. We assessed how men perceive risk associated with standardized PI-RADS language.

METHODOLOGY:

We conducted a crowdsourced survey of 1,204 men matching a US prostate cancer demographic. We queried participants' risk perception associated with standardized PI-RADS language across increasing contexts words-only, PI-RADS-sentence, full-report, and full-report-with-numeric-estimate. Median perceived risk (IQR) and absolute under/overestimation compared with AUA standards were reported. Multivariable linear mixed effects analysis identified factors associated with accuracy of risk perception.

RESULTS:

Median perceived risks of csPCa (IQR) for the word-only context were "equivocal" 50%(50-74), "likely" 75%(68-85), and "highly-likely" 87%(78-92), corresponding to +39%, +38%, +17% overestimation, respectively. Median perceived risks for the PI-RADS-sentence context were 50%(50-50), 75%(68-81), and 90%(80-94) for PI-RADS 3,4,and 5, corresponding to +39%, +38%, +20% overestimation, respectively. Median perceived risks for the full-report context were 50%(35-70), 72%(50-80), and 84%(54-91) for PI-RADS 3,4,and 5, corresponding to +39%, +35%, +14% overestimation, respectively. For the full-report-with-numeric-estimate context describing a PI-RADS 4 lesion, median perceived risk was 70%(50-80), corresponding to +33% overestimation. Including numeric estimates increased correct perception of risk from 3% to 11% (p<0.001), driven by men with higher numeracy (OR1.24,p=0.04).

CONCLUSION:

Men overestimate risk of csPCa associated with standardized PI-RADS language regardless of context, especially for PI-RADS 3 and 4 lesions. Changes to PI-RADS language or data sharing policies for imaging reports should be considered.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Am Coll Radiol Assunto da revista: RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Am Coll Radiol Assunto da revista: RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá
...