Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Application of a comprehensive disability measure: Disability prevalence among US Veterans and non-veterans from the National Health Interview Survey Data from 2015 to 2018.
Mulcahy, Abigail C; Govier, Diana J; Than, Claire T; Chawla, Neetu; Danan, Elisheva; Hooker, Elizabeth R; McCready, Holly; Hoggatt, Katherine J; Yano, Elizabeth M; Hynes, Denise M.
Afiliação
  • Mulcahy AC; Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, United States of America; Oregon Health and Sciences University/Portland State University School of Public Health, United States of America.
  • Govier DJ; Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, United States of America; Oregon Health and Sciences University/Portland State University School of Public Health, United States of America.
  • Than CT; National Precision Oncology Program, VHA Specialty Care Services, United States of America.
  • Chawla N; VA Health Systems Research (HSR) Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
  • Danan E; VA Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America; Division of General Internal Medicine, Minneapolis VA Healthcare System, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America; Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United Sta
  • Hooker ER; Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, United States of America; Oregon Health and Sciences University/Portland State University School of Public Health, United States of America.
  • McCready H; Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, United States of America.
  • Hoggatt KJ; San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, California, United States of America; Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
  • Yano EM; VA Health Systems Research (HSR) Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, United States of America; Department of Health Policy & Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, C
  • Hynes DM; Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, United States of America; Health Management and Policy, College of Health & Center for Quantitative Life Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States of America; School of Nurs
Prev Med ; 185: 108051, 2024 Jun 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38906274
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Current measures of condition-specific disabilities or those capturing only severe limitations may underestimate disability prevalence, including among Veterans.

OBJECTIVES:

To develop a comprehensive measure to characterize and compare disabilities among US Veterans and non-Veterans.

METHODS:

Using 2015-2018 pooled cross-sectional National Health Interview Survey data, we compared the frequency and survey-weighted prevalence of non-mutually exclusive sensory, social, and physical disabilities by Veteran status. We developed a measure for and examined the frequency and survey-weighted prevalence of eight mutually exclusive disability categories-sensory only; physical only; social only; sensory and physical; social and sensory; physical and social; and sensory, social, and physical.

RESULTS:

Among 118,818 NHIS respondents, 11,943 were Veterans. Veterans had a greater prevalence than non-Veterans of non-mutually exclusive physical [52.01% vs. 34.68% (p < 0.001)], sensory [44.47% vs. 21.79% (p < 0.001)], and social [17.20% vs. 11.61% (p < 0.001)] disabilities (after survey-weighting). The most frequently reported mutually exclusive disability categories for both Veterans and non-Veterans were sensory and physical (19.20% and 8.02%, p < 0.001) and physical only (16.24% and 15.69%, p = 0.216) (after survey-weighting). The least frequently reported mutually exclusive disability categories for both Veterans and non-Veterans were social only (0.31% and 0.44%, p = 0.136) and sensory and social (0.32% and 0.20%, respectively, 0.026) (after survey-weighting).

CONCLUSIONS:

Our disability metric demonstrates that Veterans have a higher disability prevalence than non-Veterans, and a higher prevalence than previously reported. Public policy and future research should consider this broader definition of disability to more fully account for the variable needs of people with disabilities.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Prev Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Prev Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos
...