Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Noninvasive transcranial brain stimulation in central post-stroke pain: A systematic review.
Mayor, Rita Sotto; Ferreira, Natália R; Lanzaro, Camile; Castelo-Branco, Miguel; Valentim, Ana; Donato, Helena; Lapa, Teresa.
Afiliação
  • Mayor RS; Anesthesiology Department, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra, Praceta Prof. Mota Pinto, 3000-075, Coimbra, Portugal.
  • Ferreira NR; Institute of Occlusion and Orofacial Pain, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
  • Lanzaro C; Anesthesiology Department, Local Unit of Health in Alto Minho, Viana do Castelo, Portugal.
  • Castelo-Branco M; Coimbra Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research (CIBIT), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
  • Valentim A; Anesthesiology Department, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra, Praceta Prof. Mota Pinto, 3000-075, Coimbra, Portugal.
  • Donato H; Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
  • Lapa T; Anesthesiology Department, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra, Praceta Prof. Mota Pinto, 3000-075, Coimbra, Portugal.
Scand J Pain ; 24(1)2024 Jan 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38956966
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The aim of this systematic review is to analyze the efficacy of noninvasive brain stimulation (NBS) in the treatment of central post-stroke pain (CPSP).

METHODS:

We included randomized controlled trials testing the efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or transcranial direct current stimulation versus placebo or other usual therapy in patients with CPSP. Articles in English, Portuguese, Spanish, Italian, and French were included. A bibliographic search was independently conducted on June 1, 2022, by two authors, using the databases MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection. The risk of bias was assessed using the second version of the Cochrane risk of bias (RoB 2) tool and the certainty of the evidence was evaluated through Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation.

RESULTS:

A total of 2,674 records were identified after removing duplicates, of which 5 eligible studies were included, involving a total of 119 patients. All five studies evaluated repetitive TMS, four of which stimulated the primary motor cortex (M1) and one stimulated the premotor/dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Only the former one reported a significant pain reduction in the short term, while the latter one was interrupted due to a consistent lack of analgesic effect.

CONCLUSION:

NBS in the M1 area seems to be effective in reducing short-term pain; however, more high-quality homogeneous studies, with long-term follow-up, are required to determine the efficacy of this treatment in CSPS.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Acidente Vascular Cerebral / Estimulação Magnética Transcraniana / Manejo da Dor / Estimulação Transcraniana por Corrente Contínua Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Scand J Pain Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Portugal

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Acidente Vascular Cerebral / Estimulação Magnética Transcraniana / Manejo da Dor / Estimulação Transcraniana por Corrente Contínua Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Scand J Pain Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Portugal
...