Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Geometrical accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for ocular proton therapy planning.
Klaassen, Lisa; Haasjes, Corné; Hol, Martijn; Cambraia Lopes, Patricia; Spruijt, Kees; van de Steeg-Henzen, Christal; Vu, Khanh; Bakker, Pauline; Rasch, Coen; Verbist, Berit; Beenakker, Jan-Willem.
Afiliação
  • Klaassen L; Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • Haasjes C; Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • Hol M; Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • Cambraia Lopes P; Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • Spruijt K; Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • van de Steeg-Henzen C; Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • Vu K; Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • Bakker P; HollandPTC, Delft, the Netherlands.
  • Rasch C; HollandPTC, Delft, the Netherlands.
  • Verbist B; HollandPTC, Delft, the Netherlands.
  • Beenakker JW; Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol ; 31: 100598, 2024 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38993288
ABSTRACT
Background &

purpose:

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used in treatment preparation of ocular proton therapy, but its spatial accuracy might be limited by geometric distortions due to susceptibility artefacts. A correct geometry of the MR images is paramount since it defines where the dose will be delivered. In this study, we assessed the geometrical accuracy of ocular MRI. Materials &

methods:

A dedicated ocular 3 T MRI protocol, with localized shimming and increased gradients, was compared to computed tomography (CT) and X-ray images in a phantom and in 15 uveal melanoma patients. The MRI protocol contained three-dimensional T2-weighted and T1-weighted sequences with an isotropic reconstruction resolution of 0.3-0.4 mm. Tantalum clips were identified by three observers and clip-clip distances were compared between T2-weighted and T1-weighted MRI, CT and X-ray images for the phantom and between MRI and X-ray images for the patients.

Results:

Interobserver variability was below 0.35 mm for the phantom and 0.30(T1)/0.61(T2) mm in patients. Mean absolute differences between MRI and reference were below 0.27 ± 0.16 mm and 0.32 ± 0.23 mm for the phantom and in patients, respectively. In patients, clip-clip distances were slightly larger on MRI than on X-ray images (mean difference T1 0.11 ± 0.38 mm, T2 0.10 ± 0.44 mm). Differences did not increase at larger distances and did not correlate to interobserver variability.

Conclusions:

A dedicated ocular MRI protocol can produce images of the eye with a geometrical accuracy below half the MRI acquisition voxel (<0.4 mm). Therefore, these images can be used for ocular proton therapy planning, both in the current model-based workflow and in proposed three-dimensional MR-based workflows.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda
...