Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing pet owners' willingness to embrace insects in pet food.
Baptista da Silva, Camila; Santos Neto, Elias Leocádio Dos; Broeckx, Bart J G; Ruiz-Suárez, Norberto; Eeckhout, Mia; Hesta, Myriam.
Afiliação
  • Baptista da Silva C; Department of Morphology, Imaging, Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Nutrition, Ghent University, Salisburylaan, Merelbeke, Belgium.
  • Santos Neto ELD; Department of Food Technology, Safety and Health, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
  • Broeckx BJG; Department of Veterinary and Biosciences, Ghent University, Heidestraat, Belgium.
  • Ruiz-Suárez N; Department of Morphology, Imaging, Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Nutrition, Ghent University, Salisburylaan, Merelbeke, Belgium.
  • Eeckhout M; Department of Food Technology, Safety and Health, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
  • Hesta M; Department of Morphology, Imaging, Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Nutrition, Ghent University, Salisburylaan, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39021335
ABSTRACT
Alternative diets for pets have gained attention in recent years due to concerns about sustainability and environmental impact. One emerging option is the inclusion of edible insects in pet food. This study aimed to survey dog (DO) and cat (CO) owners regarding their willingness to feed insect-based pet food (IBPF) to their pets and to identify potential motivating factors. A total of 435 valid responses were evaluated, with 66% being DO and 58% CO. Of those, 24% owned both dogs and cats. About half of DO (52%) and 62% of CO were positive about IBPF. CO had a higher acceptance of IBPF than DO (p < 0.05). Moreover, both DO and CO showed a significant increase in acceptance if IBPF has been proven to provide sustainable and nutritional benefits (p < 0.01). CO adhering to a specific diet themselves showed a significantly higher acceptance of IBPF (p < 0.05), however it was independent of the type of diet. Additionally, 32% of DO and 34% of CO reported prior experience with eating edible insects themselves, and a positive entomophagy experience increased DO's (p = 0.108) and CO's (p < 0.01) acceptance of IBPF. Furthermore, the interest in entomophagy resulted in increased acceptance of IBPF by both DO and CO who had not yet tried insects (p < 0.01). In conclusion, pet owners demonstrated a favourable perception of IBPF and showed a willingness to incorporate these products into their pets' diets. CO displayed a more positive perception compared to DO, suggesting a beneficial focus on the feline niche. To enhance overall acceptance, emphasizing sustainability and conducting further research to establish the nutritional benefits of IBPF are crucial. The findings of this study provide valuable insights for pet food manufacturers and marketers to develop strategies and products aligned with the preferences and needs of pet owners.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) / J. anim. physiol. anim. nutr (Berl) / Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition (Berlin) Assunto da revista: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO / FISIOLOGIA / MEDICINA VETERINARIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) / J. anim. physiol. anim. nutr (Berl) / Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition (Berlin) Assunto da revista: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO / FISIOLOGIA / MEDICINA VETERINARIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica
...