Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Automated Coronary Artery Disease Detection and Classification Using a Heterogeneous Multivendor Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Data Set.
Muscogiuri, Emanuele; van Assen, Marly; Tessarin, Giovanni; Razavi, Alexander C; Schoebinger, Max; Wels, Michael; Gulsun, Mehmet Akif; Sharma, Puneet; Fung, George S K; De Cecco, Carlo N.
Afiliação
  • Muscogiuri E; Division of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences.
  • van Assen M; Department of Cardiology, Emory University Hospital, Emory Healthcare Inc., Atlanta, GA.
  • Tessarin G; Division of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences.
  • Razavi AC; Division of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences.
  • Schoebinger M; Division of Thoracic Imaging, Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Wels M; Department of Medicine-DIMED, Institute of Radiology, University of Padova, Padua.
  • Gulsun MA; Department of Radiology, Ca' Foncello General Hospital, Treviso, Italy.
  • Sharma P; Computed Tomography, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany.
  • Fung GSK; Computed Tomography, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany.
  • De Cecco CN; Siemens Healthineers, Princeton, NJ.
J Thorac Imaging ; 2024 Jul 22.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39034758
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

We sought to clinically validate a fully automated deep learning (DL) algorithm for coronary artery disease (CAD) detection and classification in a heterogeneous multivendor cardiac computed tomography angiography data set. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

In this single-centre retrospective study, we included patients who underwent cardiac computed tomography angiography scans between 2010 and 2020 with scanners from 4 vendors (Siemens Healthineers, Philips, General Electrics, and Canon). Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) classification was performed by a DL algorithm and by an expert reader (reader 1, R1), the gold standard. Variability analysis was performed with a second reader (reader 2, R2) and the radiologic reports on a subset of cases. Statistical analysis was performed stratifying patients according to the presence of CAD (CAD-RADS >0) and obstructive CAD (CAD-RADS ≥3).

RESULTS:

Two hundred ninety-six patients (average age 53.66 ± 13.65, 169 males) were enrolled. For the detection of CAD only, the DL algorithm showed sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve of 95.3%, 79.7%, 87.5%, and 87.5%, respectively. For the detection of obstructive CAD, the DL algorithm showed sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve of 89.4%, 92.8%, 92.2%, and 91.1%, respectively. The variability analysis for the detection of obstructive CAD showed an accuracy of 92.5% comparing the DL algorithm with R1, and 96.2% comparing R1 with R2 and radiology reports. The time of analysis was lower using the DL algorithm compared with R1 (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

The DL algorithm demonstrated robust performance and excellent agreement with the expert readers' analysis for the evaluation of CAD, which also corresponded with significantly reduced image analysis time.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Thorac Imaging / J. thorac imaging / Journal of thoracic imaging Assunto da revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Thorac Imaging / J. thorac imaging / Journal of thoracic imaging Assunto da revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article
...