Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A manual synchronous low energy shock impedance as a predictor of successful defibrillation testing during subcutaneous ICD implantation.
Calvo, Naiara; López-Perales, Carlos Rubén; Olóriz, Teresa; Díaz-Cortegana, Francisco; Jáuregui, Beatriz; Soto, Nina; Rodríguez, Pilar; Santamaría, Eva; Ortas, M Rosario; Asso, Antonio.
Afiliação
  • Calvo N; Arrhytmia Unit, Cardiology Department, Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.
  • López-Perales CR; University of Zaragoza, Aragon Institute of Health Sciences, Zaragoza, Spain.
  • Olóriz T; Department of Medicine, Psychiatry and Dermatology, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
  • Díaz-Cortegana F; Arrhytmia Unit, Cardiology Department, Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.
  • Jáuregui B; University of Zaragoza, Aragon Institute of Health Sciences, Zaragoza, Spain.
  • Soto N; Arrhytmia Unit, Cardiology Department, Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.
  • Rodríguez P; University of Zaragoza, Aragon Institute of Health Sciences, Zaragoza, Spain.
  • Santamaría E; Arrhytmia Unit, Cardiology Department, Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.
  • Ortas MR; Arrhytmia Unit, Cardiology Department, Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.
  • Asso A; University of Zaragoza, Aragon Institute of Health Sciences, Zaragoza, Spain.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39099302
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Guidelines recommend defibrillation testing (DFT) during subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation. Implant position, patient characteristics and device factors, such as shock impedance, influence defibrillation success. To evaluate the shock impedance, a manual synchronous 10J shock (low energy synchronous shock [LESS]) can be delivered, without the need to induce ventricular fibrillation (VF).

OBJECTIVE:

To compare LESS and DFT impedance values and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of LESS impedance for predicting a successful DFT during S-ICD implantation.

METHODS:

Consecutive S-ICD implantations were included. Shock impedances were compared by paired t-tests. Univariate analysis was performed to investigate factors associated with successful DFT. A prediction model of successful DFT based on LESS impedance was assessed by logistic regression. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the ROC curve and the Hosmer-Lemeshow tests were used to evaluate the accuracy of LESS impedance.

RESULTS:

Sixty patients were included (52 ± 14 years; 69% male). LESS and DFT impedance values were highly correlated (r2 = 0.97, p < .01). Patients with a failed first shock had higher body mass index (BMI) (30 ± 3 vs. 25.7 ± 4.3, p = .014), higher mean LESS (120 ± 35Ω vs. 86. ± 23Ω, p = .0013) and DFT impedance (122 ± 33Ω vs. 87 ± 24Ω, p = .0013). ROC analysis showed that LESS impedance had a good diagnostic performance in predicting a successful conversion test (AUC 84% [95% CI 0.72-0.92]) with a cutoff value of <94Ω to identify a successful DFT (sensitivity 71%, specificity 73%).

CONCLUSION:

LESS impedance values without the need to induce VF can intraoperatively predict a successful DFT.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha
...