Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Exploring the Clinical Usefulness of Undergraduate Medical Research: A Mixed-Methods Study.
Burke, Emma; Savage, Colm; Begley, John; Sioufi, Stephanie; Smith, Simon; Stoyanov, Slavi; O'Tuathaigh, Colm.
Afiliação
  • Burke E; School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
  • Savage C; School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
  • Begley J; School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
  • Sioufi S; School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
  • Smith S; Medical Education Unit, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
  • Stoyanov S; Open University of the Netherlands, 177, Valkenburgerweg 6401 DL Heerlen, The Netherlands.
  • O'Tuathaigh C; Medical Education Unit, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Med Sci Educ ; 34(4): 823-830, 2024 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39099866
ABSTRACT
A significant amount of published clinical research has no measurable impact on health and disease outcomes, and research in undergraduate medical education is viewed as especially susceptible. The aims of this mixed methods study were to (a) to use group concept mapping (GCM) to explore key features identified by hospital physicians, medical educators, and medical students as central to clinical usefulness in an undergraduate medical research context, and (b) review a sample of undergraduate medical research projects based on usefulness criteria described by Ioannidis (2016). In the GCM procedure, 54 respondents (39 students, 15 physicians) from an Irish medical school participated across each of three phases brainstorming, sorting, and rating. Data was analysed using multidimensional scaling and hierarchical clustering. A retrospective analysis of 252 student projects was also completed using a rubric based on Ioannidis's (2016) six domains of "clinical usefulness" problem base, context placement and information gain, pragmatism, patient-centredness, feasibility, and transparency. Projects were scored for each domain by three assessors. Results were analysed and presented using descriptive analysis.GCM analysis revealed the following "clinically useful" research characteristics optimal design and methodology, practicality, research skills development, translational impact, patient-centredness, and asking a clinical question. Following a rubric-based analysis of projects, the highest scoring categories (mean rating; range of 1-4) were feasibility (3.57), transparency (3.32), and problem base (3.05). The lowest scoring areas were context placement and information gain (2.73), pragmatism (2.68), and patient-centredness (212). We identified considerable conceptual overlap between stakeholder consensus views on "clinical usefulness" as applied to undergraduate research and Ioannidis's criteria. Patient-centredness was identified as a domain requiring greater emphasis during the design of undergraduate medical research. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-024-02035-7.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Med Sci Educ Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Irlanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Med Sci Educ Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Irlanda
...