Role of multiparametric US in the preoperative assessment of hepatic parenchyma in patients with liver tumors.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography (SWE), shear wave dispersion (SWD), and attenuation imaging (ATI) in assessment of hepatic parenchyma in patients with liver tumors before resection. METHODS: Patients with liver tumors were prospectively enrolled in this study. All participants underwent SWE, SWD, and ATI examinations. Fibrosis stage, necroinflammatory activity and hepatic steatosis grade were determined histopathologically. We evaluated the stability of ATI, SWE and SWD examinations. Multivariable linear regression analyses were conducted to determine the determinant factors for SWE, SWD, attenuation coefficient (AC) values. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate diagnostic performance of multiparametric US (ultrasond). RESULTS: A total of 280 participants were enrolled in this study. TG (triglyceride) and steatosis for AC value were significant determinant factors. PLT (platelet), PT (prothrombin time), GGT (glutamyl transpeptidase), and fibrosis stage for SWE value were significant determinant factors. PLT, fibrosis stage and inflammation activity for SWD value were significant determinant factors. AC value was correlated with hepatic steatosis. Both SWE and SWD values were correlated with fibrosis stage, inflammation activity, respectively. The area under the ROC (AUROC) curve of ATI for predicting hepatic steatosis grade were 0.910(≥ S1), 0.927(≥ S2), 0.962(= S3), respectively. The AUROC curve of SWE for predicting fibrosis stage were 0.923(≥ S1), 0.934(≥ S2), 0.930(≥ S3), 0.895(= S4), respectively. The AUROC curve of SWD for predicting fibrosis stage were 0.858(≥ S1), 0.886(≥ S2), 0.866(≥ S1) (≥ S3), 0.825(= S4). The AUROC curve of SWE for predicting inflammation activity were 0.846(≥ G1), 0.724(≥ G2), 0.787 (≥ G3), respectively. The AUROC curve of SWD for predicting inflammation activity were 0.777(≥ G1), 0.727(≥ G2), 0.803 (≥ G3), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with liver tumors, ATI technology showed excellent feasibility and diagnostic performance for detecting and grading hepatic steatosis, SWE was more accurate in detecting fibrosis stage than SWD, SWD was not superior to SWE in detecting inflammation activity.