Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Conscientious Objection to Gender-Affirming Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Plastic Surgery and Urology Residency Programs.
Eble, Danielle J; Nguyen, Alisha L; Roblee, Cole V; Tople, Tannon L; Friedrich, Jeffrey B; Skokan, Alexander J; Hagedorn, Judith C; Sorensen, Mathew D; Kraft, Kate H; Lane, Megan E; Janis, Jeffrey E; Kuzon, William M; Ettinger, Russell E; Morrison, Shane D.
Afiliação
  • Eble DJ; Division of Plastic Surgery, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
  • Nguyen AL; Division of Plastic Surgery, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington; Department of Surgery, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington.
  • Roblee CV; Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Surgery, Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University, North Chicago, Illinois.
  • Tople TL; Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities School of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Friedrich JB; Division of Plastic Surgery, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
  • Skokan AJ; Division of Plastic Surgery, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
  • Hagedorn JC; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
  • Sorensen MD; Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
  • Kraft KH; Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Lane ME; Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Janis JE; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Kuzon WM; Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Ettinger RE; Division of Plastic Surgery, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
  • Morrison SD; Division of Plastic Surgery, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Electronic address: shane.morrison@seattlechildrens.
J Surg Educ ; 81(11): 1675-1682, 2024 Sep 16.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39288511
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Medical conscientious objection is a federally protected right of physicians to refuse participation in medically indicated services or research activities that are incompatible with their ethical, moral, or religious beliefs. Individual provider objections to gender-affirming surgery have been documented, however the prevalence of such objections is unknown. Our study aimed to characterize physician objections to gender-affirming surgery in plastic surgery and urology residencies and to assess related institutional policies. DESIGN, SETTING,

PARTICIPANTS:

A cross-sectional electronic survey was administered to program leadership of 239 accredited US plastic surgery and urology residencies from February to October 2023. Trainee exposure to gender-affirming surgery, programmatic experience with objections, and presence and content of institutional objection policies were collected. Bivariate analyses were performed to determine associations with objectors.

RESULTS:

One-hundred and twenty-four plastic surgery (n = 59) and urology (n = 65) residencies completed the survey, representing a 52% response rate. Most programs included didactic training (n = 107, 86%) and direct clinical exposure (n = 98, 79%) to gender-affirming surgery. Few (n = 24, 19%) endorsed existent objection policies. Sixteen programs (13%) experienced objections to gender-affirming surgery by trainees (n = 15), faculty (n = 6), and staff (n = 1). Neither geographic region, exposure to gender-affirming surgery, nor presence of objection policies significantly contributed to programmatic objections. Programs with formal objection policies reported increased confidence in addressing future objection events (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS:

Objection to gender-affirming surgery is a rare, but plausible occurrence amongst plastic surgery and urology trainees. Residency programs should consider anticipatory policies to protect patients and, when feasible, provide reasonable accommodations for objecting trainees.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Educ Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Educ Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article
...