Impact of Dyspnea on Adults With Respiratory Symptoms Without a Defined Diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: We investigated dyspnea, its associated risk factors, and its impact on health care utilization, quality of life, and work productivity in adults with undiagnosed respiratory symptoms. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the impact of dyspnea in adults with undiagnosed respiratory symptoms? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This population-based study included 2,857 adults who were experiencing respiratory symptoms. These individuals had not been previously diagnosed with any lung conditions and were recruited from 17 Canadian centers using random digit dialing. Each participant underwent spirometry testing both before and after using a bronchodilator to determine if they met the diagnostic criteria for COPD, asthma, or preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm), or if their spirometry results were normal. An age-matched control group (n = 231) was similarly recruited using random digit dialing. A dyspnea impact assessment score from 0 to 100 was produced using questions from the COPD Assessment Test and St. George's Respiratory questionnaire. RESULTS: Individuals with PRISm (n = 172) reported more impactful dyspnea (mean score, 63.0; 95% CI, 59.5-66.4) than those with undiagnosed asthma (n = 265; mean score, 56.6; 95% CI, 53.9-59.3) or undiagnosed COPD (n = 330; mean score, 57.5; 95% CI, 55.1-59.9). All groups reported significantly more impactful dyspnea than the control group (mean score, 13.8; 95% CI, 11.8-15.7). Patient-specific risk factors including age, sex, BMI, smoking, and comorbidities explained 20.6% of the variation in dyspnea. An additional 12.4% of the variation was explained by disease classification and another 1.7% by the severity of lung function impairment assessed with spirometry. After adjusting for age, sex, and BMI, greater dyspnea impact was associated with increased health care utilization, lower quality of life, and reduced work productivity. INTERPRETATION: In community-based adults with undiagnosed respiratory symptoms, those identified with PRISm experienced the greatest impact of dyspnea. Dyspnea imposes burdens on the health care system and is associated with impaired quality of life and work productivity.

Association between lung function and sleep disorder symptoms in a community-based multi-site case-finding study.

Obstructive airway disease is associated with sleep disturbances. We aimed to assess the relationship between lung function and sleep disorder symptoms using cross-sectionally collected data between March 2017 and August 2021 from the Undiagnosed Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Asthma Population study, a prospective community-based multi-site case-finding study. Undiagnosed Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Asthma Population study participants with respiratory symptoms but without diagnosed lung disease who completed spirometry and the Global Sleep Assessment Questionnaire were included. We conducted multivariate linear regression models for forced expiratory volume in 1 s, forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity by Global Sleep Assessment Questionnaire responses adjusted for confounders. The same models were employed to examine respiratory symptoms, as reported on the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test, by Global Sleep Assessment Questionnaire responses. Logistic regression models were used to assess the association of undiagnosed obstructive airway disease with sleep symptoms. Amongst 2093 adults included in the study, 48.3% were female and the median age was 63 years (interquartile range 53-72). Two-hundred and five (9.79%) subjects met spirometry criteria for undiagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 191 (9.13%) for undiagnosed asthma. There were no significant associations between spirometry measures and sleep symptoms (p > 0.5), controlling for age, sex, body mass index, smoking and comorbidities. Those with undiagnosed asthma were more likely to report insomnia "at least sometimes" versus "never" (odds ratio 2.58, 95% confidence interval: 1.27-6.19, p = 0.02). Respiratory symptoms were associated with sleep symptoms, with significant (p < 0.05) increases in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test scores in those reporting most sleep symptoms. Overall, we found an association between undiagnosed asthma and insomnia, and between respiratory and sleep disorder symptoms.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation purulence status and its association with pulmonary embolism: protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) increases the risk of pulmonary embolism (PE). AECOPD and PE have similar symptoms which results in a high proportion of patients with AECOPD undergoing imaging to rule out PE. Finding predictors and explanatory factors of PE in AECOPD, such as purulence status, could help reduce the need for imaging. This systematic review with meta-analysis aims to evaluate if there is an association between purulence status in AECOPD and PE diagnosis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL will be searched from database inception to April 2024. Randomised trials, cohort studies and cross-sectional studies on the prevalence of PE in patients with AECOPD will be included if the prevalence of PE based on the AECOPD purulence status is available. There will be no restriction on language. The primary outcome will be PE at the initial assessment and secondary outcomes will be all venous thromboembolism (deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and PE) and DVT, respectively, diagnosed at the initial assessment. Relative risks with their 95% CI will be calculated by using a Mantel-Haenszel random-effect model to compare the association between the risk of PE and the AECOPD purulence status (purulent vs non-purulent/unknown). Subgroup analyses will be performed based on the type of study, systematic search of PE versus no systematic search of PE and localisation of PE. Risk of bias will be evaluated by the ROBINS-E tool, publication bias will be evaluated with the funnel plot. The manuscript will be drafted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study does not require ethics approval. This work will be submitted for presentation at an international conference and for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023459429.

Evaluation of the quality of emergency department management for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with exacerbations and high risk of serious outcomes. Our goal was to determine the appropriateness of the emergency department (ED) management of COPD exacerbations. METHODS: This observational cohort study incorporated a health records review and included COPD exacerbation cases seen at two large academic EDs. We included all patients with the primary diagnosis of COPD exacerbation. From the electronic medical record, demographic and clinical data were abstracted, and the Ottawa COPD Risk Score (OCRS) was calculated for each. Short-term serious outcomes included intensive care unit admission, intubation, myocardial infarction, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIV), and death at 30 days. Cases were judged for appropriateness of treatment according to explicit indications and standards developed a priori. RESULTS: We enrolled 500 cases with mean age of 71.9 years, 51.2% female patients, 50.2% admitted, and 4.4% death. The calculated OCRS score was >2 for 70.8% of patients. The treatments provided were inhaled ß-agonists (82.6%), inhaled anticholinergics (76.6%), corticosteroids (75.2%), antibiotics (71.0%), oxygen (63.8%), NIV (8.8%), and intubation (0.6%). Overall, 50.0% of cases were judged to have had inadequate management due to missing treatments. Specifically, the proportion of missing treatments were inhaled ß-agonist (17.0%), inhaled anticholinergic (22.6%), corticosteroids (24.4%), antibiotics (12.8%), and NIV (2.0%). CONCLUSION: Adequate treatment of COPD exacerbation was lacking in 50.0% of patients in these two large academic EDs. Concerning were the number of patients not receiving corticosteroids or antibiotics. Implementation of explicit treatment standards should lead to improved patient care of this common and serious condition.

Early Diagnosis and Treatment of COPD and Asthma - A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Many persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma have not received a diagnosis, so their respiratory symptoms remain largely untreated. METHODS: We used a case-finding method to identify adults in the community with respiratory symptoms without diagnosed lung disease. Participants who were found to have undiagnosed COPD or asthma on spirometry were enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial to determine whether early diagnosis and treatment reduces health care utilization for respiratory illness and improves health outcomes. Participants were assigned to receive the intervention (evaluation by a pulmonologist and an asthma-COPD educator who were instructed to initiate guideline-based care) or usual care by their primary care practitioner. The primary outcome was the annualized rate of participant-initiated health care utilization for respiratory illness. Secondary outcomes included changes from baseline to 1 year in disease-specific quality of life, as assessed with the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ; scores range from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating better health status); symptom burden, as assessed with the COPD Assessment Test (CAT; scores range from 0 to 40, with lower scores indicating better health status); and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). RESULTS: Of 38,353 persons interviewed, 595 were found to have undiagnosed COPD or asthma and 508 underwent randomization: 253 were assigned to the intervention group and 255 to the usual-care group. The annualized rate of a primary-outcome event was lower in the intervention group than in the usual-care group (0.53 vs. 1.12 events per person-year; incidence rate ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36 to 0.63; P<0.001). At 12 months, the SGRQ score was lower than the baseline score by 10.2 points in the intervention group and by 6.8 points in the usual-care group (difference, -3.5 points; 95% CI, -6.0 to -0.9), and the CAT score was lower than the baseline score by 3.8 points and 2.6 points, respectively (difference, -1.3 points; 95% CI, -2.4 to -0.1). The FEV1 increased by 119 ml in the intervention group and by 22 ml in the usual-care group (difference, 94 ml; 95% CI, 50 to 138). The incidence of adverse events was similar in the trial groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial in which a strategy was used to identify adults in the community with undiagnosed asthma or COPD, those who received pulmonologist-directed treatment had less subsequent health care utilization for respiratory illness than those who received usual care. (Funded by Canadian Institutes of Health Research; UCAP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03148210.).

Resource Use and Costs of Indwelling Pleural Catheters versus Pleurodesis for Malignant Pleural Effusions: A Population-based Study.

Rationale: Malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) are associated with significant health service use and healthcare costs, but the current evidence is limited. Objectives: To compare 12-month post-procedure: 1) health service utilization; and 2) healthcare costs after indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) insertion with at-home drainage performed by home care nursing services, versus in-hospital chemical pleurodesis. Methods: We performed a retrospective population-based study on a cohort of adults with MPEs who underwent IPC insertion or chemical pleurodesis between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019 using provincial health administrative data (Ontario, Canada). Patients were followed from the procedure date until death or until 12 months after the procedure. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was performed to adjust for imbalances in baseline characteristics. Differences in length of stay, readmissions, emergency department visits, home care visits, and healthcare costs were estimated using weighted regression analysis. Results: Of 5,752 included individuals, 4,432 (77%) underwent IPC insertion and 1,320 (23%) had pleurodesis. In the weighted sample, individuals who received an IPC had fewer inpatient days (12.4 d vs. 16 d; standardized mean difference, 0.229) but a higher proportion of subsequent admissions for empyema (2.7% vs. 1.1%; P = 0.0002) than those undergoing pleurodesis. Individuals with IPCs received more hours of nursing home care (41 h vs. 21.1 h; standardized mean difference, 0.671) but overall had lower average healthcare costs ($40,179 vs. $46,640 per patient; standardized mean difference, 0.177) than those receiving pleurodesis. Conclusions: IPCs with home nursing drainage are associated with reduced health resource use compared with pleurodesis in adults with MPEs, even after controlling for important baseline and clinical characteristics. Given that both procedures have similar health outcomes, our findings support the ongoing promotion of IPCs to increase outpatient management of patients with MPEs.

Anticipating undiagnosed asthma in symptomatic adults with normal pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry: a decision tool for bronchial challenge testing.

BACKGROUND: Some patients with asthma demonstrate normal spirometry and remain undiagnosed without further testing. OBJECTIVE: To determine clinical predictors of asthma in symptomatic adults with normal spirometry, and to generate a tool to help clinicians decide who should undergo bronchial challenge testing (BCT). METHODS: Using random-digit dialling and population-based case-finding, we recruited adults from the community with respiratory symptoms and no previous history of diagnosed lung disease. Participants with normal pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry subsequently underwent BCT. Asthma was diagnosed in those with symptoms and a methacholine provocative concentration (PC20) of < 8 mg/ml. Sputum and blood eosinophils, and exhaled nitric oxide were measured. Univariate analyses identified potentially predictive variables, which were then used to construct a multivariable logistic regression model to predict asthma. Model sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) were calculated. RESULTS: Of 132 symptomatic individuals with normal spirometry, 34 (26%) had asthma. Of those ultimately diagnosed with asthma, 33 (97%) answered 'yes' to a question asking whether they experienced cough, chest tightness or wheezing provoked by exercise or cold air. Other univariate predictors of asthma included female sex, pre-bronchodilator FEV1 percentage predicted, and percent positive change in FEV1 post bronchodilator. A multivariable model containing these predictive variables yielded an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.72-0.91), a sensitivity of 82%, and a specificity of 66%. The model was used to construct a nomogram to advise clinicians which patients should be prioritized for BCT. CONCLUSIONS: Four readily available patient characteristics demonstrated a high sensitivity and AUC for predicting undiagnosed asthma in symptomatic adults with normal pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry. These characteristics can potentially help clinicians to decide which individuals with normal spirometry should be investigated with bronchial challenge testing. However, further prospective validation of our decision tool is required.

Impact of Undiagnosed Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Asthma on Symptoms, Quality of Life, Healthcare Use, and Work Productivity.

Rationale: A significant proportion of individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma remain undiagnosed. Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate symptoms, quality of life, healthcare use, and work productivity in subjects with undiagnosed COPD or asthma compared with those previously diagnosed, as well as healthy control subjects. Methods: This multicenter population-based case-finding study randomly recruited adults with respiratory symptoms who had no previous history of diagnosed lung disease from 17 Canadian centers using random digit dialing. Participants who exceeded symptom thresholds on the Asthma Screening Questionnaire or the COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire underwent pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry to determine if they met diagnostic criteria for COPD or asthma. Two control groups, a healthy group without respiratory symptoms and a symptomatic group with previously diagnosed COPD or asthma, were similarly recruited. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 26,905 symptomatic individuals were interviewed, and 4,272 subjects were eligible. Of these, 2,857 completed pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry, and 595 (21%) met diagnostic criteria for COPD or asthma. Individuals with undiagnosed COPD or asthma reported greater impact of symptoms on health status and daily activities, worse disease-specific and general quality of life, greater healthcare use, and poorer work productivity than healthy control subjects. Individuals with undiagnosed asthma had symptoms, quality of life, and healthcare use burden similar to those of individuals with previously diagnosed asthma, whereas subjects with undiagnosed COPD were less disabled than those with previously diagnosed COPD. Conclusions: Undiagnosed COPD or asthma imposes important, unmeasured burdens on the healthcare system and is associated with poor health status and negative effects on work productivity.

2023 Canadian Thoracic Society Guideline on Pharmacotherapy in Patients With Stable COPD.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patient care must include confirming a diagnosis with postbronchodilator spirometry. Because of the clinical heterogeneity and the reality that airflow obstruction assessed by spirometry only partially reflects disease severity, a thorough clinical evaluation of the patient should include assessment of symptom burden and risk of exacerbations that permits the implementation of evidence-informed pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions. This guideline provides recommendations from a comprehensive systematic review with a meta-analysis and expert-informed clinical remarks to optimize maintenance pharmacologic therapy for individuals with stable COPD, and a revised and practical treatment pathway based on new evidence since the 2019 update of the Canadian Thoracic Society (CTS) Guideline. The key clinical questions were developed using the Patients/Population (P), Intervention(s) (I), Comparison/Comparator (C), and Outcome (O) model for three questions that focuses on the outcomes of symptoms (dyspnea)/health status, acute exacerbations, and mortality. The evidence from this systematic review and meta-analysis leads to the recommendation that all symptomatic patients with spirometry-confirmed COPD should receive long-acting bronchodilator maintenance therapy. Those with moderate to severe dyspnea (modified Medical Research Council ≥ 2) and/or impaired health status (COPD Assessment Test ≥ 10) and a low risk of exacerbations should receive combination therapy with a long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting ẞ2-agonist (LAMA/LABA). For those with a moderate/severe dyspnea and/or impaired health status and a high risk of exacerbations should be prescribed triple combination therapy (LAMA/LABA/inhaled corticosteroids) azithromycin, roflumilast or N-acetylcysteine is recommended for specific populations; a recommendation against the use of theophylline, maintenance systemic oral corticosteroids such as prednisone and inhaled corticosteroid monotherapy is made for all COPD patients.

Complexity in clinical diagnoses of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is a clinical syndrome with various causes. It is not uncommon that COPD patients presenting with dyspnea have multiple causes for their symptoms including AECOPD, pneumonia, or congestive heart failure occurring concurrently. METHODS: To identify clinical, radiographic, and laboratory characteristics that might help distinguish AECOPD from another dominant disease in patients with a history of COPD, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients with admitting diagnosis of AECOPD who were screened for a prospective randomized controlled trial from Sep 2016 to Mar 2018. Clinical characteristics, course in hospital, and final diagnosis at discharge were reviewed and adjudicated by two authors. The final diagnosis of each patient was determined based on the synthesis of all presenting signs and symptoms, imaging, and laboratory results. We adhered to AECOPD diagnosis definitions based on the GOLD guidelines. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify any associated features of AECOPD with and without other acute processes contributing to dyspnea. RESULTS: Three hundred fifteen hospitalized patients with admitting diagnosis of AECOPD were included. Mean age was 72.5 (SD 10.6) years. Two thirds (65.4%) had spirometry defined COPD. The most common presenting symptom was dyspnea (96.5%), followed by cough (67.9%), and increased sputum (57.5%). One hundred and eighty (57.1%) had a final diagnosis of AECOPD alone whereas 87 (27.6%) had AECOPD with other conditions and 48 (15.2%) did not have AECOPD after adjudication. Increased sputum purulence (OR 3.35, 95%CI 1.68-6.69) and elevated venous pCO2 (OR 1.04, 95%CI 1.01 - 1.07) were associated with a diagnosis of AECOPD but these were not associated with AECOPD alone without concomitant conditions. Radiographic evidence of pleural effusion (OR 0.26, 95%CI 0.12 - 0.58) was negatively associated with AECOPD with or without other conditions while radiographic evidence of pulmonary edema (OR 0.31; 95%CI 0.11 - 0.91) and lobar pneumonia (OR 0.13, 95%CI 0.07 - 0.25) suggested against the diagnosis of AECOPD alone. CONCLUSION: The study highlighted the complexity and difficulty of AECOPD diagnosis. A more specific clinical tool to diagnose AECOPD is needed.

Short-term air pollution exposure and exacerbation events in mild to moderate COPD: a case-crossover study within the CanCOLD cohort.

BACKGROUND: Infections are considered as leading causes of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Non-infectious risk factors such as short-term air pollution exposure may play a clinically important role. We sought to estimate the relationship between short-term air pollutant exposure and exacerbations in Canadian adults living with mild to moderate COPD. METHODS: In this case-crossover study, exacerbations ('symptom based': ≥48 hours of dyspnoea/sputum volume/purulence; 'event based': 'symptom based' plus requiring antibiotics/corticosteroids or healthcare use) were collected prospectively from 449 participants with spirometry-confirmed COPD within the Canadian Cohort Obstructive Lung Disease. Daily nitrogen dioxide (NO2), fine particulate matter (PM2.5), ground-level ozone (O3), composite of NO2 and O3 (Ox), mean temperature and relative humidity estimates were obtained from national databases. Time-stratified sampling of hazard and control periods on day '0' (day-of-event) and Lags ('-1' to '-6') were compared by fitting generalised estimating equation models. All data were dichotomised into 'warm' (May-October) and 'cool' (November-April) seasons. ORs and 95% CIs were estimated per IQR increase in pollutant concentrations. RESULTS: Increased warm season ambient concentration of NO2 was associated with symptom-based exacerbations on Lag-3 (1.14 (1.01 to 1.29), per IQR), and increased cool season ambient PM2.5 was associated with symptom-based exacerbations on Lag-1 (1.11 (1.03 to 1.20), per IQR). There was a negative association between warm season ambient O3 and symptom-based events on Lag-3 (0.73 (0.52 to 1.00), per IQR). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term ambient NO2 and PM2.5 exposure were associated with increased odds of exacerbations in Canadians with mild to moderate COPD, further heightening the awareness of non-infectious triggers of COPD exacerbations.

Factors Associated with Attrition in a Longitudinal Cohort of Older Adults in the Community.

Introduction: Retaining participants in longitudinal studies increases their power. We undertook this study in a population-based longitudinal cohort of adults with COPD to determine the factors associated with increased cohort attrition. Methods: In the longitudinal population-based Canadian Cohort of Obstructive Lung Disease (CanCOLD) study, 1561 adults > 40 years old were randomly recruited from 9 urban sites. Participants completed in-person visits at 18-month intervals and also were followed up every 3 months over the phone or by email. The cohort retention for the study and the reasons for attrition were analyzed. Hazard ratios and robust standard errors were calculated using Cox regression methods to explore the associations between participants who remained in the study and those who did not. Results: The median follow-up (years) of the study is 9.0 years. The overall mean retention was 77%. Reasons for attrition (23%) were: dropout by participant (39%), loss of contact (27%), investigator-initiated withdrawal (15%), deaths (9%), serious disease (9%), and relocation (2%). Factors independently associated with attrition were lower educational attainment, higher pack-year tobacco consumption, diagnosed cardiovascular disease, and a higher Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score: adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) were 1.43(1.11, 1.85); 1.01(1.00, 1.01); 1.44(1.13, 1.83); 1.06(1.02, 1.10) respectively. Conclusions: Identification and awareness of risk factors for attrition could direct targeted retention strategies in longitudinal studies. Moreover, the identification of patient characteristics associated with study dropout could address any potential bias introduced by differential dropouts.

Impaired Spirometry and COPD Increase the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Canadian Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with COPD and preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) findings in clinical settings have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). RESEARCH QUESTION: Do individuals with mild to moderate or worse COPD and PRISm findings in community settings have a higher prevalence and incidence of CVD compared with individuals with normal spirometry findings? Can CVD risk scores be improved when impaired spirometry is added? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The analysis was embedded in the Canadian Cohort Obstructive Lung Disease (CanCOLD). Prevalence of CVD (ischemic heart disease [IHD] and heart failure [HF]) and their incidence over 6.3 years were compared between groups with impaired and normal spirometry findings using logistic regression and Cox models, respectively, adjusting for covariables. Discrimination of the pooled cohort equations (PCE) and Framingham risk score (FRS) in predicting CVD were assessed with and without impaired spirometry. RESULTS: Participants (n = 1,561) included 726 people with normal spirometry findings and 835 people with impaired spirometry findings (COPD Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease [GOLD] stage 1 disease, n = 408; GOLD stage ≥ 2, n = 331; PRISm findings, n = 96). Rates of undiagnosed COPD were 84% in GOLD stage 1 and 58% in GOLD stage ≥ 2 groups. Prevalence of CVD (IHD or HF) was significantly higher among individuals with impaired spirometry findings and COPD compared with those with normal spirometry findings, with ORs of 1.66 (95% CI, 1.13-2.43; P = .01∗) (∗ indicates statistical significane with P < .05) and 1.55 (95% CI, 1.04-2.31; P = .033∗), respectively. Prevalence of CVD was significantly higher in participants having PRISm findings and COPD GOLD stage ≥ 2, but not GOLD stage 1. CVD incidence was significantly higher, with hazard ratios of 2.07 (95% CI, 1.10-3.91; P = .024∗) for the impaired spirometry group and 2.09 (95% CI, 1.10-3.98; P = .024∗) for the COPD group compared to individuals with normal spirometry findings. The difference was significantly higher among individuals with COPD GOLD stage ≥ 2, but not GOLD stage 1. The discrimination for predicting CVD was low and limited when impaired spirometry findings were added to either risk score. INTERPRETATION: Individuals with impaired spirometry findings, especially those with moderate or worse COPD and PRISm findings, have increased comorbid CVD compared with their peers with normal spirometry findings, and having COPD increases the risk of CVD developing.

Differential Diagnosis of Suspected Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations in the Acute Care Setting: Best Practice.

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may suffer from acute episodes of worsening dyspnea, often associated with increased cough, sputum, and/or sputum purulence. These exacerbations of COPD (ECOPDs) impact health status, accelerate lung function decline, and increase the risk of hospitalization. Importantly, close to 20% of patients are readmitted within 30 days after hospital discharge, with great cost to the person and society. Approximately 25% and 65% of patients hospitalized for an ECOPD die within 1 and 5 years, respectively. Patients with COPD are usually older and frequently have concomitant chronic diseases, including heart failure, coronary artery disease, arrhythmias, interstitial lung diseases, bronchiectasis, asthma, anxiety, and depression, and are also at increased risk of developing pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, and pneumothorax. All of these morbidities not only increase the risk of subsequent ECOPDs but can also mimic or aggravate them. Importantly, close to 70% of readmissions after an ECOPD hospitalization result from decompensation of other morbidities. These observations suggest that in patients with COPD with worsening dyspnea but without the other classic characteristics of ECOPD, a careful search for these morbidities can help detect them and allow appropriate treatment. For most morbidities, a thorough clinical evaluation supplemented by appropriate clinical investigations can guide the healthcare provider to make a precise diagnosis. This perspective integrates the currently dispersed information available and provides a practical approach to patients with COPD complaining of worsening respiratory symptoms, particularly dyspnea. A systematic approach should help improve outcomes and the personal and societal cost of ECOPDs.