Coronary perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of abciximab platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade: an algorithm for percutaneous management.

Coronary perforation is an uncommon but potentially life-threatening complication of percutaneous coronary intervention. The use of both atheroablative technologies for coronary intervention and adjunctive platelet glycoprotein blockade pharmacology may increase the incidence of or risk for life-threatening bleeding complications following the occurrence of coronary artery perforation. The interventional database for 6,214 percutaneous coronary interventions performed between January 1995 and June 1999 was analyzed. Hospital charts and cine angiograms for all patients identified in the database as having had coronary perforation were reviewed. Coronary perforation complicated 0.58% of all procedures and was more commonly observed in patients with a history of congestive heart failure and following use of atheroablative interventional technologies (2.8%). There was no association of abciximab therapy with either the incidence of or classification for coronary perforation. Adverse clinical outcomes (death, emergency surgical exploration) were related to the angiographic classification of perforation and were more frequently observed in patients who experienced a class 3 coronary perforation. These data suggest that specific clinical and procedural demographic factors are associated with the occurrence and severity of angiographic coronary perforation. An angiographic perforation class-specific algorithm for treatment of coronary perforation is proposed.

Abciximab provides cost-effective survival advantage in high-volume interventional practice.

BACKGROUND: Placebo-controlled randomized trials of platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary intervention have demonstrated efficacy of these agents for reducing the risk of periprocedural ischemic events. However, cost-effectiveness of this adjunctive pharmacotherapy has been scrutinized. Extrapolation of cost-efficacy observations from clinical trials to "real world" interventional practice is problematic. METHODS: Consecutive percutaneous coronary interventions (n = 1472) performed by Ohio Heart Health Center operators at The Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio, in 1997 were analyzed for procedural and long-term (6-month) outcomes and charges. Observations on cost and efficacy (survival) were adjusted for nonrandomized abciximab allocation by means of "propensity scoring" methods. RESULTS: Abciximab therapy was associated with a survival advantage to 6 months after percutaneous coronary intervention. The average reduction in mortality rate at 6 months was 3.4% (unadjusted) and 4.9% when adjusted for nonrandomization. The average charge increment to 6 months was $1512 (unadjusted) and $950 when adjusted for nonrandomization. Patients deriving the greatest reduction in mortality rates also had a reduction in total cardiovascular charges to 6 months. Distinguishing demographics of this population included multivessel coronary intervention, coronary stent deployment, intervention within 1 week of myocardial infarction, and lower left ventricular ejection fraction. The average cost per life-year gained in this study was $2875 for all patients (unadjusted) and $1243 when adjusted for nonrandomization. CONCLUSIONS: Abciximab provides a cost-effective survival advantage in high-volume interventional practice that compares favorably with currently accepted standards. Clinical and procedural demographics associated with increased cost-effectiveness included multivessel coronary intervention, stent deployment, recent (<1 week) myocardial infarction, and impaired left ventricular function.

High platelet count in platelet-rich plasma reduces measured platelet inhibition by abciximab but not tirofiban nor eptifibatide glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists.

We evaluated the differential effect of platelet count in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on the level of ex vivo inhibition of platelet aggregation provided by abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban as part of a randomized, comparative trial of these agents on platelet function in patients with unstable angina pectoris undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Platelet count <350 K/microL in PRP reduced measured platelet inhibition by abciximab, but not eptifibatide nor tirofiban. This observation suggests the need for standardized, uniform platelet counts in PRP during future comparisons of the degree of platelet inhibition by these agents.

Therapeutic adjuncts for immediate transfer to the catheterization laboratory in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Early coronary intervention in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) and unstable angina may be made safer and more efficacious with concomitant therapies, including glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and low-molecular-weight heparins. Stent placement has been shown to improve procedural success and reduce major in-hospital complications when compared with balloon angioplasty alone in patients with unstable angina. However, unstable angina remains a major hazard for adverse coronary events in long-term follow-up after elective stent placement. The currently available glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors-eptifibatide, tirofiban, and abciximab--have each been shown to reduce ischemic events before percutaneous coronary intervention when administered to patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes in large clinical trials. The adjunctive role of low-molecular-weight heparins in this scenario has been largely unexplored. Enoxaparin, when given before angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention, has been shown to be superior to unfractionated heparin in preventing major coronary events. In this review, an algorithm for treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes is presented and the current role of these newer adjunctive pharmacotherapies is explored. In the future, combinations of these agents may prove to be most beneficial in patients undergoing early percutaneous coronary intervention.

Time course, magnitude, and consistency of platelet inhibition by abciximab, tirofiban, or eptifibatide in patients with unstable angina pectoris undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Adjunctive platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces platelet-mediated adverse ischemic outcomes. Although abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban have received U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for use, these agents differ in their pharmacodynamic profiles. Each of these agents has been compared in randomized trials with placebo for patients undergoing PCI, but no randomized comparative studies of these agents have been performed. We compared ex vivo platelet function by both standard light transmission aggregometry and rapid platelet function assay during and after administration of abciximab, eptifibatide, or tirofiban in approved dose regimens on a randomized basis at the time of PCI in patients with unstable angina pectoris. A reduced intensity of platelet inhibition by light transmission aggregometry was observed for tirofiban compared with either eptifibatide or abciximab. In addition, the 30-minute bolus strategy used for tirofiban was associated with delayed onset of maximal platelet inhibition relative to the initiation of bolus infusion. Whether the trends in platelet function observed in this study will be translated into differences in clinical outcomes awaits definition by larger scale randomized clinical trials comparing these platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors.

Efficacy of abciximab induced platelet blockade using a rapid point of care assay.

Anciximab provides potent, but variable degrees of platelet inhibition both during the duration of intravenous administration and at 12 hours following therapy. Platelet function was assessed using the PC-RPFA system in 78 patients scheduled for percutaneous coronary revascularization who were administered the standard abciximab weight-adjusted bolus and 12-hour infusion. The PC-RPFA system is a cartridge-based, semiautomated point-of-care whole-blood assay that incorporates fibrinogen-coated polystyrene beads, buffers, and a modified thrombin receptor activating peptide (Isotrap) in lyophilized form. The instrument detects the agglutination rate between the stimulated platelets and the fibrinogen-coated beads, and provides a quantitative digital display in less than 2 minutes. No differences in the level of platelet inhibition were observed in these abciximab-treated patients by diabetic status, gender, smoking, diagnosis (unstable angina, chronic stable angina, recent myocardial infarction), or abciximab treatment status (first time vs. retreatment). Nocorrelation of the PC-RPFA rate of platelet aggregation with clinical demographic factors was observed, with the exception of baseline hematocrit (r2 = 0.4556). The relationship between the PC-RPFA rate of aggregation and hematocrit reflects light absorbance by erythrocytes and is specific to the PC-RPFA system. The absolute rate of platelet aggregation (slope) reported by the PC-RPFA is correlated with percent aggregation, thus making it potentially possible to predict the level of aggregation without reference to a baseline (pretreatment) measure of platelet function. This correlation was closest for patients having <40% baseline aggregation (r2 = 0.55). Thus, PC-RPFA provides a rapid point-of-care assessment of platelet function that could allow for adjustment of abciximab dosing to achieve targeted levels of platelet inhibition. The utility of this device to optimize therapy with platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors is currently being evaluated.

Pharmacodynamic efficacy, clinical safety, and outcomes after prolonged platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade with oral xemilofiban: results of a multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Parenteral administration of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GP IIb/IIIa) receptor blockers can reduce ischemic complications of coronary angioplasty. Orally active GP IIb/IIIa blockers may allow more sustained receptor antagonism with the potential for long-term secondary prevention. The pharmacodynamic efficacy, clinical safety, and outcomes after prolonged receptor blockade with an orally active GP IIb/IIIa antagonist are not known. The Oral Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Blockade to Inhibit Thrombosis (ORBIT) Trial is a multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of xemilofiban, an oral platelet GP IIb/IIIa blocking agent, administered to patients after percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS AND RESULTS: After successful elective percutaneous coronary intervention, 549 patients were randomized to receive either placebo or xemilofiban in a dose of 15 or 20 mg. Stented patients randomized to placebo also received ticlopidine 250 mg orally BID for 4 weeks. Patients who received abciximab during the coronary intervention and who were randomized to receive xemilofiban were administered a reduced dosage (10 mg TID for 2 weeks) followed by the randomized maintenance dose of 15 or 20 mg BID for 2 more weeks. All patients received 325 mg aspirin PO QD. Ex vivo platelet aggregation in response to 20 micromol/L ADP and 4 microg/mL collagen was measured over time after the initial dose of study drug and at days 14 and 28 of long-term therapy in 230 patients. All patients were followed clinically for 90 days. Xemilofiban inhibited platelet aggregation to both ADP and collagen with peak levels of inhibition that were similar at 14 and 28 days of long-term oral therapy. Plasma levels of xemilofiban correlated with the degree of platelet inhibition. Peak platelet inhibition on day 1 correlated with the subsequent occurrence of insignificant or mild bleeding events. Although this study was not powered to evaluate differences in clinical outcomes, a trend (P=0.04) was observed for reduction of cardiovascular events at 3 months in patients not treated with abciximab who received the highest dose (20 mg) of xemilofiban studied. CONCLUSIONS: Xemilofiban inhibited platelet aggregation and was well tolerated during 28 days of long-term oral therapy. The observed trend in reduction of cardiovascular events in follow-up awaits confirmation in the larger-scale phase III study (EXCITE trial) currently in progress.

Clinical characteristics and long-term outcome of patients in whom congestive heart failure develops after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: development of a predictive model.

Ischemic heart disease is the most common cause of congestive heart failure, which often begins after acute myocardial infarction. To better delineate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients in whom congestive heart failure develops after acute myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era, we prospectively evaluated patients enrolled in six of the TAMI trials. The study cohort comprised 1619 consecutive patients who had at least 1 mm of ST-segment elevation in two contiguous electrocardiographic leads within 6 hours of the onset of acute myocardial infarction and who received intravenous thrombolytic therapy. We prospectively collected clinical characteristics, baseline demographics, acute and 1-week angiographic variables, and in-hospital and 1-year outcome data. We performed stepwise multivariable regression analysis to determine the noninvasive and invasive predictors of the development of in-hospital congestive heart failure. Congestive heart failure developed in 301 patients in the hospital (19% of 1521 patients admitted were not in heart failure). These patients were likely to be older and female, have diabetes mellitus and previous myocardial infarction, and have an anterior wall myocardial infarction. On acute angiography, they had lower ejection fractions and a higher incidence of multivessel disease. Patency at 90 minutes was lower in the patients with congestive heart failure, and acute mitral regurgitation occurred in 1.6% versus 0.21% of patients without congestive heart failure. Patients with congestive heart failure had higher mortality, more in-hospital complications, and longer hospitalizations. At 1-year follow up, 21% of the patients in whom congestive heart failure developed had died versus 5% in the group without congestive heart failure. Predictors of new congestive heart failure included increased age, anterior wall myocardial infarction, lower pulse pressure and systolic blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, and the presence of rales on admission. The acute angiographic variables of reduced ejection fraction, increased number of diseased vessels, and attempted percutaneous intervention improved the concordance of the predictive model by 6%. Congestive heart failure remains a common clinical problem after acute myocardial infarction and is associated with a twofold increase in in-hospital morbidity and a fourfold increase in in-hospital and 1-year mortality. The development of congestive heart failure in the hospital can be predicted from noninvasive and invasive baseline characteristics. We present a simple table to predict congestive heart failure from baseline characteristics and invasive information.

Abciximab-associated profound thrombocytopenia: therapy with immunoglobulin and platelet transfusion.

First-time abciximab administration was associated with acute profound thrombocytopenia in 4 of 575 consecutive patients. Therapy with platelet transfusion, but not intravenous immunoglobulin, was associated with a rapid and sustained increment in circulating platelet count and clinical hemostasis.

Clinical importance of thrombocytopenia occurring in the hospital phase after administration of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence and clinical implications of thrombocytopenia that occurs in hospital after administration of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: The use of thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction has improved mortaltiy rates, but hemorrhage remains a major complication. Because thrombocytopenia may be associated with hemorrhage after thrombolytic therapy, we examined the incidence and clinical implications of thrombocytopenia after administration of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: The patient population comprised 1,001 patients enrolled in Phases 2, 3 and 5 of the Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (TAMI) trial and the urokinase trial. Patients received recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator, urokinase or combination therapy in various dosing schemes. All patients received heparin, aspirin and a calcium-channel blocking agent. Thrombocytopenia occurring anytime after thrombolytic therapy was defined as a nadir platelet count either < 100,000/microliters or < 1/2 baseline. Blood loss was quantified by a bleeding index. Multiple logistic regression was used to evaluate the independent contribution of thrombocytopenia in a model predicting in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Thrombocytopenia occurred in 16.4% of patients, with no difference among the thrombolytic regimens. Patients with thrombocytopenia had a lower median acute ejection fraction and a higher likelihood of three-vessel coronary artery disease than patients without thrombocytopenia. Patients with thrombocytopenia had more hemorrhage, a higher in-hospital mortality rate and a more complicated hospital course than patients without thrombocytopenia, even after consideration of other important variables, including age, acute ejection fraction, number of diseased vessels, bypass surgery and use of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation. CONCLUSIONS: Thrombocytopenia after thrombolytic therapy is a common event and is associated with excess hemorrhage and mortality. Platelet counts should be monitored daily after administration of thrombolytic therapy because the appearance of thrombocytopenia identifies a subset of patients at increased risk for hemorrhage and death.

Coronary angioplasty performed with gradual and prolonged inflation using a perfusion balloon catheter: procedural success and restenosis rate.

The results of routine coronary angioplasty using gradual and prolonged balloon inflation with a perfusion balloon catheter were evaluated. One hundred forty patients were treated with inflation of the balloon to 6 atm over 3 minutes, with a median inflation time of 15 minutes. The procedural success rate (residual stenosis less than or equal to 50%) was 99%. In-hospital major complications occurred in five patients (3.6%), with one patient experiencing a periprocedural infarction, three patients requiring bypass surgery for abrupt closure, and one patient dying after elective bypass surgery following previous successful angioplasty of a culprit lesion. The restenosis rate in the 117 patients with angiographic follow-up (87% of those eligible) was 42%. Thus gradual and prolonged inflation using a perfusion balloon catheter resulted in a high procedural success rate and a restenosis rate similar to that reported in large studies of patients treated with standard angioplasty. These results warrant further study using a prospective randomized trial design.

Myocardial infarction with minimal coronary atherosclerosis in the era of thrombolytic reperfusion. The Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (TAMI) Study Group.

The incidence of minimal residual atherosclerotic coronary obstruction after successful intravenous thrombolytic therapy was evaluated in 799 patients with acute myocardial infarction. Minimal residual coronary obstruction (less than or equal to 50%) was observed on selective coronary angiography performed 90 min after initiation of thrombolytic therapy in 43 patients (5.5%). In 42 other patients (5.4%), a greater than 50% but less than 100% residual stenosis noted at 90 min demonstrated further resolution of obstruction to less than 50% at an angiographic follow-up study 7 to 10 days later. Patients with minimal residual coronary obstruction were significantly younger (52 +/- 10.7 versus 56.7 +/- 10 years; p = 0.002) and had less multivessel coronary disease (p less than 0.001), better initial left ventricular ejection fraction (54 +/- 12% versus 50.2 +/- 11.4%; p = 0.006) and a lower in-hospital mortality rate (1% versus 7%; p = 0.04) than did patients who had a significant (greater than 50%) residual coronary obstruction after intravenous thrombolysis. Long-term follow-up study of patients with a minimal coronary lesion (average 1.5 +/- 0.6 years) and those with significant residual stenosis (average 1.6 +/- 0.7 years) demonstrated that the incidence of death (2.4% in patients with minimal stenosis versus 3.5% in those with significant stenosis) and recurrent myocardial infarction (5% each) were similar in both groups. New strategies are needed to prevent coronary rethrombosis in patients with minimal atherosclerosis after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction.

Prehospital diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction: a north-south perspective. The Cincinnati Heart Project and the Nashville Prehospital TPA Trial.

Intravenous thrombolytic therapy improves left ventricular function and reduces mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). In European and Middle Eastern trials, prehospital delivery of thrombolytic agents by physician-directed mobile intensive care units has been successful. This report describes two independently conceived and performed trials that used cellular telephone transmission of 12-lead ECGs to deliver recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-tPA) in the field to patients with AMI. In the Nashville Prehospital TPA Trial, 85 patients with chest pain were evaluated in the field for possible administration of r-tPA over a 6-month period. Three of 85 patients (3.5%) were found to be actual candidates for r-tPA treatment in the field. In phase II (dry-run phase) of the Cincinnati Heart Project, 374 patients were evaluated in the field with 14 documented cases of AMI (3.7%) before r-tPA was placed in ambulances for administration by paramedics. In phase III (active with r-TPA in ambulances), over a 1-year period 103 patients were evaluated with six (5.8%) documented cases of AMI. Three of five r-tPA field treatment decisions by emergency physicians using transmitted 12-lead ECGs were accurate (60%). When patients in phases II and III were combined, only 20 of 477 total patients (4.2%) were documented to have AMI. A decline in paramedic skills was noted because of the infrequent administration of the thrombolytic agent. Combining the Nashville and Cincinnati experiences, only 27 of 562 total patients with chest pain (4.8%) were candidates for prehospital thrombolysis. We conclude that few patients evaluated in the prehospital setting are actual candidates for thrombolytic therapy. Substantial allocation of financial and human resources for prehospital delivery of intravenous thrombolytic therapy does not appear warranted.

Fate of patients with acute myocardial infarction with patency of the infarct-related vessel achieved with successful thrombolysis versus rescue angioplasty.

Patients with failure of infarct-related artery recanalization after thrombolytic therapy have a poor clinical outcome. These patients have been considered for rescue angioplasty 90 min after thrombolytic therapy at the time of emergency catheterization in the course of five Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (TAMI) trials. The outcome of 776 patients with patent infarct-related vessels after emergency catheterization was analyzed--607 with thrombolysis-mediated patency of the infarct-related vessel and 169 with patency achieved by angioplasty. Baseline characteristics of the thrombolysis and angioplasty patency groups were similar except for a higher acute left ventricular ejection fraction (51.3% versus 48.2%) in the thrombolysis group (p = 0.003). Seven to 10 day left ventricular ejection fraction was higher (52.3% versus 48.1%), infarct zone functional recovery was greater (0.44 versus 0.21 standard deviation/chord, or 18% versus 7%, p = 0.001) and reocclusion was less (11% versus 21%) in the thrombolysis compared with the angioplasty group. Despite these differences, angioplasty patency was associated with the same low in-hospital mortality rate (5.9% versus 4.6%) and long-term mortality rate (3% versus 2%) as thrombolysis patency. Reocclusion adversely affected the mortality rate and ventricular functional recovery. Technical failure of rescue angioplasty was associated with a much higher mortality rate than was technical success (39.1% versus 5.9%). Thrombolysis patency was preferable to angioplasty patency after thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction, but both were associated with the same low in-hospital and long-term mortality rates, suggesting that rescue angioplasty is beneficial in some patients with failure of infarct-related artery recanalization after thrombolytic therapy.

Two-year outcome after angiographically documented myocardial reperfusion for acute coronary occlusion. Thrombolysis and Angioplasty Study Group.

Reperfusion therapy has been clearly shown to decrease the early mortality after acute myocardial infarction, but the impact of this therapy on long-term survival has been less extensively evaluated. This study reports the extended follow-up of a large cohort of 810 patients treated with intravenous thrombolytic therapy combined, when considered necessary to maintain or augment infarct vessel patency, with mechanical reperfusion therapies. Each patient underwent coronary angiography within 2 hours of the initiation of the thrombolytic infusion. Coronary angioplasty was performed in 62% of the patients before hospital discharge and 21% underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Follow-up was obtained in 96% to a mean of 18.8 months (range, 1.5 to 48 months). All-cause mortality over this period was 3.3%; 2.1% died from cardiac causes. Nonfatal reinfarction occurred in 5.1%. Although the low event rate limits the validity of statistical comparisons, the patients who survived the follow-up period tended to be younger (56 +/- 10 vs 65 +/- 7 years), to have better predischarge left ventricular function (left ventricular ejection fraction, 52 +/- 11 vs 46 +/- 13%) and to have a lower prevalence of multivessel coronary artery disease (45 vs 67%). This excellent long-term survival may, in part, reflect the exclusion of high-risk patients from enrollment in the Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (TAMI) studies. It may also be attributable, however, to the frequent use of combined thrombolysis and mechanical revascularization in this population.

Stroke and acute myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era: clinical correlates and long-term prognosis.

Thirteen (1.8%) of 708 patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator in the Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (TAMI) I, II and III trials developed a stroke. Four strokes were hemorrhagic and nine were nonhemorrhagic. Of five prespecified risk factors for intracranial hemorrhage (age greater than 65 years, history of hypertension, history of prior cerebrovascular disease, aspirin use and acute hypertension), two patients had two risk factors and one patient had one risk factor. However, 80% of patients without intracranial hemorrhage had at least one risk factor and 31% had two risk factors. No patient with a prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (all greater than 6 months previously) had an intracranial hemorrhage. Of three prespecified risk factors for nonhemorrhagic stroke (atrial fibrillation, prior cerebrovascular disease and large anterior wall infarction), only the occurrence of a large anterior myocardial infarction (with ejection fraction less than 45%) was a predictor (p = 0.0015). The in-hospital death rate was 25% for patients with hemorrhagic stroke versus 11% for patients with a non-hemorrhagic stroke and 6% for those patients without a stroke. Furthermore, the hospital stay was greater than 50% longer in patients who had a stroke than in those who did not. Thus, intracranial hemorrhage remains an unpredictable risk in patients treated with thrombolytic therapy and cerebral infarction is related to anterior myocardial infarction and poor left ventricular function. Both types of stroke are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality.

Consequences of reocclusion after successful reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction. TAMI Study Group.

To determine the clinical consequences of reocclusion of an infarct-related artery after reperfusion therapy, we evaluated 810 patients with acute myocardial infarction. Patients were admitted into four sequential studies with similar entry criteria in which patency of the infarct-related artery was assessed by coronary arteriography 90 minutes after onset of thrombolytic therapy. Successful reperfusion was established acutely in 733 patients. Thrombolytic therapy included tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) in 517, urokinase in 87, and a combination of t-PA and urokinase in 129 patients. All patients received aspirin, intravenous heparin and nitroglycerin, and diltiazem during the recovery phase. A repeat coronary arteriogram was performed in 88% of patients at a median of 7 days after the onset of symptoms. Reocclusion of the infarct-related artery occurred in 91 patients (12.4%), and 58% of these were symptomatic. Angiographic characteristics at 90 minutes after thrombolytic therapy that were associated with reocclusion compared with sustained coronary artery patency were right coronary infarct-related artery (65% versus 44%, respectively) and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow 0 or 1 (21% versus 10%, respectively) before further intervention. Median (interquartile value) degree of stenosis in the infarct-related artery at 90 minutes was similar between groups: 99% for reoccluded (value, 90/100%) compared with 95% for patent (value, 80/99%). Patients with reocclusion had similar left ventricular ejection fractions compared with patients with sustained patency at follow-up. However, patients with reocclusion at follow-up had worse infarct-zone function at -2.7 (value, -3.2/-1.8) versus -2.4 (SD/chord) (value, -3.1/-1.3) (p = 0.016). The recovery of both global and infarct-zone function was impaired by reocclusion of the infarct-related artery compared with maintained patency; median delta ejection fraction was -2 compared with 1 (p = 0.006) and median delta infarct-zone wall motion was -0.10 compared with 0.34 SD/chord (p = 0.011), respectively. In addition, patients with reocclusion had more complicated hospital courses and higher in-hospital mortality rates (11.0% versus 4.5%, respectively; p = 0.01). We conclude that reocclusion of the infarct-related artery after successful reperfusion is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality rates. Reocclusion is also detrimental to the functional recovery of both global and infarct-zone regional left ventricular function. Thus, new strategies in the postinfarction period need to be developed to prevent reocclusion of the infarct-related artery.