The Learning Curve in Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Few data are available on the learning curve (LC) in robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RAPD) and no study specifically addresses the LC of a single surgeon. METHODS: The LC of a single surgeon in RAPD was determined using the cumulative sum method, based on operative time (OT). Data were extracted from a prospectively maintained database and analyzed retrospectively considering all events occurring within 90 days of index operation. RESULTS: Seventy RAPD were analyzed. One operation was converted to open surgery (1.4%). One patient died within 30 days (1.4%) and one within 90 days (2.8%). Postoperative complications occurred in 53 patients (75.7%) and exceeded Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb in 7 patients (10%). OT dropped after 33 operations from a mean of 564 ± 101.7 min to a mean of 484.1 ± 77.9 min (p = 0.0005) and was associated to reduced incidence of delayed gastric emptying (72.7 vs. 48.7%; p = 0.039). The rate of hospital readmission improved after 40 operations from 20.0 (8 of 40) to 3.3% (1 of 30) (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: RAPD was safely feasible in selected patients. OT dropped after the first 33 operations and was associated with reduced rate of delayed gastric emptying. Readmission rate improved after 40 operations.

Feasibility of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy is feasible, but requires adaptations to established surgical techniques. The improved dexterity offered by robotic assistance provides the opportunity to see whether laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy can be performed safely when faithfully reproducing the open operation. METHODS: Patients were selected for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy when generally suitable for laparoscopy. Obese patients were excluded, and those with pancreatic cancer were highly selected. A prospectively designed database was used for data collection and analysis. RESULTS: Of 238 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, 34 (14·3 per cent) were operated on robotically. No procedure was converted to conventional laparoscopy or open surgery, despite three patients requiring segmental resection of the superior mesenteric/portal vein and reconstruction. The mean duration of operation was 597 (range 420-960) min. The mean number of lymph nodes retrieved and analysed from patients with neoplasia was 32 (range 15-76). Four patients required blood transfusions and five developed postoperative complications exceeding Clavien-Dindo grade II. There were four grade B pancreatic fistulas. One patient died on postoperative day 40. Excess mean operative cost compared with open resection was €6193. CONCLUSION: Selected patients can safely undergo robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. The main downsides are high costs and prolonged operating times compared with open resection.

Total duodenectomy with enteric duct drainage: a rescue operation for duodenal complications occurring after pancreas transplantation.

Duodenal graft complications (DGC) occur frequently after pancreas transplantation but rarely cause graft loss. Graft pancreatectomy, however, may be required when DGC compromise recipient's safety. We herein report on two patients with otherwise untreatable DGC in whom the entire pancreas was salvaged by means of total duodenectomy with enteric drainage of both pancreatic ducts. The first patient developed recurrent episodes of enteric bleeding, requiring hospitalization and blood transfusions, starting 21 months after transplantation. The disease causing hemorrhage could not be defined, despite extensive investigations, but the donor duodenum was eventually identified as the site of bleeding. The second patient was referred to us with a duodenal stump leak, 5 months after transplantation. Two previous surgeries had failed to seal the leak, despite opening a diverting stoma above the duodenal graft. Thirty-nine and 16 months after total duodenectomy with dual duct drainage, respectively, both patients are insulin-independent and free from abdominal complaints. Magnetic resonance pancreatography shows normal ducts both basal and after intravenous injection of secretin. The two cases presented herein show that when DGC jeopardize pancreas function or recipient safety, total duodenectomy with enteric duct drainage may become an option.

[Living donor kidney transplant: the crossover modality]. / Il trapianto di rene da donatore vivente: la modalita' crossover.

Living donor kidney transplantation (LKD) has to be considered the best transplant choice for ESRD patients in terms of organ quality and survival. ABO incompatibility and positive cross-match frequently impede LKD. Recently, options based on stronger immunosuppression, apheresis techniques and Ig administration have been proposed to overcome the biological barriers. International guidelines on LKD advise paired exchange as the preferable transplant option to avoid the hazard of blood type or cross-match incompatibility. Since 1986 many paired exchange LKD programs have been started in the world including the USA, Japan, South Korea and, in Europe, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Romania, Germany and Italy. The first Italian paired exchange LKD was performed at the Pisa Transplant Center in November 2005 between three couples of spouses. One year later a National Program was established by the Italian National Transplant Center. The second experience in Italy was again in Pisa in December 2007 between two couples of spouses. International reports have shown that paired exchange LKD offers good clinical results comparable to direct LKD. In our experience paired exchange LKD is to be considered a quality choice for uremic patients, in that it allows them to obtain the benefit of an LKD that would otherwise not be practicable.

Contribution of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography to nonoperative management of segmental ischemia of the head of a pancreas graft.

A 32-year-old recipient of a pancreas transplant (PTx) alone was diagnosed with segmental graft ischemia, involving the head of the pancreas graft (HPG), based on color Doppler ultrasonography (CDU) and computed tomography (CT) angiography. For investigational purposes, graft supply was further checked by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEU). Surprisingly, CEU showed collateral blood supply to the HPG starting from 40 s after contrast injection and resulting in homogenous parenchymography at 90 s. Full-dose heparin infusion, followed by long-term oral anticoagulation, allowed graft salvage without reoperation. At the longest follow-up of 18 months, the patient is insulin independent. This case report shows that CEU may be employed in PTx recipients suspected to harbor vascular complications. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first description of the use of CEU in PTx and the first description of graft salvage, without partial pancreatectomy after CDU and CT diagnosis of segmental graft ischemia.

Neoral versus prograf in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation with portal venous drainage: three-year results of a single-center, open-label, prospective, randomized pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The preferential use of tacrolimus (Prograf) over cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral) in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKTx) is mainly based on historical, retrospective studies. We herein report the 3-year results of a single-center, prospective, randomized comparison of the two calcineurin inhibitors in the setting of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)-based immunosuppression and portal drainage of pancreas allografts. METHODS: Between May 2001 and August 2004, 47 SPKTx recipients who were stratified by recipient sex, were alternatively assigned to treatment with Neoral (n = 22) or Prograf (n = 25). Concurrent immunosuppression included induction treatment with basiliximab and maintenance with MMF and steroids. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 24.0 months, all patients remained in the study arm into which they were initially enrolled. No pancreas rejection episode was observed. One acute kidney rejection was recorded in the Neoral arm (4.5%) as compared with 7 (28.0%) including one steroid-resistant episode, in the Prograf arm (P = .03). The cumulative incidence of adverse events was 31.8% (n = 7) in the Neoral arm compared with 92.0% (n = 23) in the Prograf arm (P < .0001). One patient died in each study arm. Patient, pancreas, and kidney survivals overlapped at 1- and 3-years posttransplant, namely all 95.4% for the Neoral arm compared with 95.8%, 91.8%, and 95.8%, respectively, for the Prograf arm (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in MMF-based immunosuppression there is no convincing evidence that Prograf should be preferred to Neoral in SPKTx.

Outcome of 118 pancreas transplants with retroperitoneal portal-enteric drainage.

BACKGROUND: We have recently described a technique for retroperitoneal pancreas transplantation (RPTx) with portal-enteric drainage (PED). Further experience with 118 RPTx is detailed herein. METHODS: Between April 2001 and August 2004, 118 patients underwent RPTx with PED among 125 recipients (94.4%) scheduled for this procedure. Surgical complications and patient and graft survivals were recorded prospectively. RESULTS: After a minimum follow-up period of 3 months (mean 27.8 +/- 13.0 months), 18 recipients (15.2%) required relaparotomy because of bleeding (n = 6; 5.1%), allograft pancreatectomy due to either hyperacute/accelerated rejection (n = 3; 2.5%) or vein thrombosis (n = 3; 2.5%), leak from duodenojejunal anastomosis (n = 2; 1.7%), bleeding and vein thrombectomy (n = 1; 0.8%), or small bowel occlusion due to bezoar (n = 1; 0.8%). One patient had a negative relaparotomy and one underwent two relaparotomies. Most patients with hemorrhage (5/7; 71.4%) were recipients of solitary pancreas grafts managed with heparin infusion. No venous thrombi extended into recipient's superior mesenteric vein. Nonocclusive venous thrombosis was diagnosed with duplex ultrasonography and confirmed at computed tomography in seven patients (5.1%). None of these patients lost graft function. Ten patients (8.5%) were diagnosed with peripancreatic fluid collections, all successfully treated by observation (n = 7) or percutaneous drainage (n = 3). Enteric bleeding occurred in eight recipients (6.8%). Overall, 1-year patient and pancreas survival rates were 97.4% and 92.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that RPTx with PED is a technical option that may be included in the repertoire of pancreas transplant surgeons.

Surveillance and rescue of pancreas grafts.

BACKGROUND: Technical failure rates are higher for pancreas allografts (PA) compared with other solid organs. Posttransplant surveillance and prompt availability of rescue teams with multidisciplinary expertise both contribute to improve this result. We herein report a single institution's experience with posttransplant surveillance and rescue of PA. METHODS: A retrospective survey was performed of a consecutive series of 177 whole organ pancreas transplants in 173 patients. Antithrombotic prophylaxis was used in all recipients and tailored on anticipated individual risk of thrombosis. During the first posttransplant week, all PA were monitored with daily Doppler ultrasonography. Surgical complications were defined as all adverse events requiring relaparotomy during the initial hospital stay or the first 3 posttransplant months. RESULTS: A total of 26 relaparotomies were performed in 25 patients (14.7%). One recipient needed two relaparotomies (0.6%). Graft rescue was attempted in patients without permanent parenchymal damage at repeat surgery and in 12 recipients diagnosed with nonocclusive vascular thrombosis. Overall 25 grafts (96.3%) were rescued and one was lost. One-year recipient and graft survivals in patients with versus without complications potentially leading to allograft loss were 92.6% and 63.0% versus 94.4% and 94.3%, respectively. Excluding complications for which graft rescue was not possible, 1-year graft survival rate increased to 78.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Close posttransplant surveillance can allow rescue of a relevant proportion of PA developing nonocclusive venous thrombosis or other surgical complications. Further improvement awaits better understanding of biological reasons for posttransplant complications jeopardizing PA survival and the development of more effective preventive measures.

University of Wisconsin solution versus Celsior solution in clinical pancreas transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: This study compared the safety and efficacy of University of Wisconsin solution (UW) and Celsior solution (C) in pancreas transplantation (PTx). METHODS: A retrospective review of 154 PTx performed over a 61-month period included 77 grafts preserved with UW and 77 with C. The two groups were comparable for both donor and recipient characteristics. RESULTS: After a mean cold ischemia time of 624 minutes (range 360 to 945 minutes) for UW versus 672 minutes (range 415 to 1005 minutes) for C (P = NS), no primary endocrine nonfunction occurred. Delayed endocrine function was diagnosed in two grafts in the UW group (2.6%) versus none in the C group (P = NS). After a minimum follow-up of 4 months (mean 26.5 +/- 15.2 months), 22 recipients (UW = 11 vs C = 11; P = NS) required relaparotomy. Overall, 18 pancreata were lost due to either patient death with functioning graft (UW = 4 vs C = 1; P = NS) or graft loss due to other reasons (UW = 8 vs C = 5; P = NS). Actuarial 1- and 5-year patient survival rates were 93.5% and 86.8% for UW compared with 98.7% and 98.7% for C (P = .04). Actuarial graft survival rates at the same times were 88.3% and 75.0% for UW compared with 90.4% and 90.4% for C (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Within the range of cold ischemia times reported in this study, UW and C show similar safety and efficacy profiles for PTx.

Pancreas transplants from donors aged 45 years or older.

AIMS: Since donor age of 45 years or more is considered a relative contraindication for pancreas transplantation (PTx), we herein report our experience with these donors. METHODS: Pancreases from donors aged 45 years or older were used in 16 of 147 PTx procedures (11%). The final decision to accept a graft for PTx was based mainly on the quality of visceral perfusion and the gross appearance of the pancreas and the vessels. There were 9 men and 7 women, ranging in age from 45 to 55 years (average, 48.9 years) who were donors, due to cerebrovascular accidents (n = 11; 68.7%). Among the donor group, 5 patients were receiving multiple vasopressor agents (31.2%), and 2 had a history of cardiac arrest (12.5%). Pancreases were transplanted either simultaneously with a cadaveric kidney (n = 6) or as solitary grafts (n = 10). RESULTS: After a mean period of cold preservation of 616 minutes (range, 475 to 844 min), delayed endocrine function occurred in 1 recipient (6%), who subsequently achieved insulin independence. Two recipients died suddenly, with functioning grafts. Two further grafts were lost due to portal vein thrombosis (6%) or late arterial thrombosis (6%). Three patients required repeat surgery (18.7%). After a mean follow-up period of 26.6 months, actuarial 1-year and 5-year patient survival rates were 87.5%, with insulin independence in 81.2% and 67.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Meticulous donor selection and short preservation times allow the safe use of pancreases procured from donors aged 45 years or older, thus expanding the donor pool for PTx procedures.

Ninety-five percent insulin independence rate 3 years after pancreas transplantation alone with portal-enteric drainage.

AIMS: Portal-enteric drainage (PED) might be particularly suitable for pancreas transplantation alone (PTA), since it has been associated with an immunologic advantage and achieves excellent metabolic results. We describe our experience with a consecutive series of 40 PTAs with PED. METHODS: Between April 2001 and March 2004, 40 consecutive PTAs were performed with PED. Recipients were selected according to the American Diabetic Association recommendations. Donors were selected according to standard criteria irrespective of HLA match, although matching for A and B loci was considered at the time of graft allocation. Immunosuppression consisted of induction treatment with basiliximab (n = 34) or thymoglobulin (n = 6), and maintenance therapy with steroids, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus. RESULTS: After a mean cold ischemia time of 690 minutes (range, 517-965 min) all pancreases functioned immediately. Three grafts were lost due to hyperacute or accelerated rejection. No graft was lost to vascular thrombosis, although 5 (12.5%) nonocclusive thromboses were identified and the grafts were rescued with intravenous heparin infusion. A repeat laparotomy was required in 7 recipients (17.5%) No patient required multiple repeat laparotomies, and none died. After a mean follow-up of 16.4 months (range, 1-36 mo), 2 recipients were diagnosed with rejection episodes, which were reversed with steroid boluses. Actuarial 3-year patient, and graft survival rates were 100% and 94.9%, respectively. The following parameters showed significant improvement compared with pretransplantation evaluation: hemoglobin A1C concentration, total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, arterial blood pressure, cardiac performance, retinopathy, proteinuria, and neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreas transplantation alone with PED provides high rates of long-term insulin-independence.

Pancreas transplantation: problems and prospects in intensive care units.

AIM: The aim of this study is to describe personal experience in the intensive management of patients with severe diabetes undergoing pancreas transplantation. METHODS: Clinical records of subjects consecutively undergoing an isolated or combined pancreas transplant have been examinated. RESULTS: During the considered period, 10 patients received an isolated pancreas transplant and 43 a simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SPKT), including 6 using a kidney from a living donor. The mean stay in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) was 4.7 days: 52 patients (98.2%) were transferred to the Surgical Department, whereas one (1.8%) belonging to the SPKT group died with a non-functioning graft. Ten patients (18.6%) were re-admitted because of the onset of late complications, including one SPKT who died of sudden cardiac death with functioning grafts. Arterial hypertension appeared in 51% of the recipients, and 5.6% experienced at least one hypotensive episode. Cardiac rhythm alterations were diagnosed in 5 subjects (9.4%), and myocardial ischemia in 9 (17%). CONCLUSIONS: Pancreas transplantation is a therapeutic option that can improve patients' quality of life by also slowing down the evolution of diabetes; however, it is important to bear in mind the associated risks. The best results are obtained in patients in whom the disease has not already seriously impaired the function of the various target organs.

Small-bowel obstruction due to Bezoar following pancreas transplantation with portal-enteric drainage: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Despite recent improvements, surgical complications continue to occur frequently after pancreas transplantation, remaining the leading cause of early graft loss. Small-bowel obstruction, however, is exceedingly rare; it has not been associated with an enhanced risk of graft loss. METHODS: Intestinal obstruction occurred 7 days after pancreas transplantation due to bezoar blockage at the level of the jejunojejunostomy of the Roux-en-Y loop, which had been constructed to drain the exocrine secretions of the pancreas graft. RESULTS: CT scan promptly identified the foreign body and greatly facilitated graft rescue before duodenal rupture or the development of graft pancreatitis. Nineteen months after repeat laparotomy the patient is alive with good pancreatic endocrine function. CONCLUSIONS: In cases of pancreas transplantation with enteric drainage, obstruction of the Roux-en-Y loop may create a totally sealed system that may lead to severe duodenal dilation and eventually to duodenal rupture or graft pancreatitis.

Cardiac evaluation for simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation and incidence of cardiac perioperative complications: preliminary study.

Type I diabetes mellitus (IDDM) is associated with an increased cardiovascular risk, and eligibility protocols for simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) are consequently accurate for preoperative cardiovascular assessment. According to our algorithm, coronary angiography in SPKT candidates is indicated for patients not only experiencing previous cardiac events or symptoms, but also those with long-standing diabetes (more than 25 years) and/or age over 45 years. Furthermore, a basal transthoracic echocardiographic exam (TTE) is performed to assess cardiac volumes, left ventricular mass, systolic function, and kinesis. The aims of this study were to evaluate perioperative cardiac morbidity and mortality in 18 SPKT-eligible patients, divided into two groups on the basis of the presence/absence of angiographically evident coronary artery disease (CAD), as well as to assess the impact of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) on cardiac complications. Cardiac intraoperative morbidity and mortality and postoperative mortality and major morbidity were absent; minor cardiac morbidity consisted only of silent ischemic ECG alterations, without significant differences between groups, although the incidence seemed to be higher in the CAD-positive population. LVH detected preoperatively by TTE exam also failed to correlate with the incidence of such complications. Selection of SPKT candidates by coronary angiography may have positive effects on perioperative cardiac morbidity and mortality. A larger sample size is needed to give the study statistical power. Medium- and long-term follow-up studies are warranted to evaluate the effects of preoperative selection on survival rates.

[Blood coagulation monitoring during liver transplantation: Sonoclot analysis and laboratory tests]. / Monitorizzazione della coagulazione in corso di trapianto di fegato: validazione dell'analisi tromboelastografica "Sonoclot" attraverso le indagini di laboratorio.

BACKGROUND: Aim of this paper is to validate blood coagulation data obtained using the Sonoclot thromboelastographic analyser (Sienco Inc., Morrison, USA) by means of standard laboratory tests during orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). DESIGN: comparative study between laboratory data and Sonoclot analysis on simultaneously collected blood samples. SETTING: National Health System Liver Transplantation Center. PATIENTS: fifty-one patients, both males and females, affected by terminal hepatic disease submitted to OLT were enrolled in the study. DATA COLLECTION: simultaneous blood samples were collected during the pre-anhepatic, anhepatic and post-reperfusion phases of OLT; coagulation status was assessed by means of either standard Laboratory tests (INR, aPTT, Fibrinogen, PLT, D-Dimer) and Sonoclot analyser data (SonACT, Rate, Time to Peak, Downward Deflection); a statistical analysis was performed (Pearson s chi(2) test). RESULTS: A statistically significative correlation between the analysed data was found. The Sonoclot analyser was useful in identifying platelets dysfunction and was more sensitive to detect fibrinolysis. CONCLUSIONS: The Sonoclot thromboelastographic analyser is a reliable device for monitoring coagulation during OLT.

[Early tracheal extubation ofter orthotopic liver transplantation]. / Estubazione tracheale precoce dopo trapianto ortotopico di fegato.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate an early tracheal extubation feasibility in previously unselected orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) patients. DESIGN: retrospective analysis. SETTING: National Health System Intensive Care Unit. PATIENTS: all the patients who underwent OLT during 1997 at our institution were evaluated. The anesthestic management was the same for all of them and a veno-venous bypass was always used during the anhepatic phase. Tracheal extubation was performed when metabolic and haemodynamic parameters were stable; the following extubation criteria were also considered: no residual curarization, normocarbia, ability to keep the airway patent, good respiratory drive, ability to carry out simple orders. No pre- or intraoperative criteria, as previously reported in the literature for OLT patients, were followed to perform tracheal extubation in the postoperative period. RESULTS: During 1997 forty OLTs were performed in 38 patients. Twenty-eight patients were successfully extubated within 3 hours from the end of the surgical procedure; three patients were extubated within 6 hours and three within 24 hours from the end of surgery; four patients needed more then 24 hours of ventilation or were impossible to wean. No patient was re-intubated. A correlation appeared evident between early extubation and the amount of the transfused red cell units, kidneys and lungs function, cardiovascular efficiency; no correlation emerged with patients age or the pre-transplant severity of the hepatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: To perform a safe early tracheal extubation in previously unselected OLT patients is feasible and it can be carried out in a wide number of them. The previously reported timing characterizing as "early" a tracheal extubation should be moved from 8 to 3 hours.