Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters








Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Europace ; 11(2): 213-5, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19168497

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy is an accepted treatment for heart failure but it may be necessary to explant these systems along with their leads. The evidence base for coronary sinus (CS) lead extractions is limited. We aimed to evaluate the percutaneous removal of these leads and the utility of laser extraction when necessary. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 265 patients referred for lead extraction between January 2004 and June 2008, 32 (12.1%) involved CS leads (30 males, mean age 67 years). Mean implantation time was 26.5 +/- 28.7 months (range 1-116 months). Indications for extraction were pocket infection (34.4%), lead malfunction (43.8%), skin erosion (15.6%), and endocarditis (6.2%). Twenty-eight (87.5%) CS leads were removed with manual traction, with laser utilized in four cases (12.5%). No major complications of CS laceration, pericardial effusion, emergency surgery, or death occurred. CONCLUSION: Our experience supports the percutaneous extraction of CS leads as a safe and effective procedure including the utility of laser when necessary.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures/methods , Coronary Sinus/surgery , Defibrillators, Implantable , Device Removal/methods , Laser Therapy/methods , Pacemaker, Artificial , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Device Removal/adverse effects , Device Removal/instrumentation , Female , Heart Diseases/therapy , Humans , Laser Therapy/adverse effects , Laser Therapy/instrumentation , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL