Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
BMC Emerg Med ; 22(1): 27, 2022 02 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35164693

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute heart failure patients are often encountered in emergency departments (ED) from 11% to 57% using emergency medical services (EMS). Our aim was to evaluate the association of EMS use with acute heart failure patients' ED management and short-term outcomes. METHODS: This was a sub-analysis of a European EURODEM study. Data on patients presenting with dyspnoea were collected prospectively from European EDs. Patients with ED diagnosis of acute heart failure were categorized into two groups: those using EMS and those self-presenting (non- EMS). The independent association between EMS use and 30-day mortality was evaluated with logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 500 acute heart failure patients, with information about the arrival mode to the ED, 309 (61.8%) arrived by EMS. These patients were older (median age 80 vs. 75 years, p < 0.001), more often female (56.4% vs. 42.1%, p = 0.002) and had more dementia (18.7% vs. 7.2%, p < 0.001). On admission, EMS patients had more often confusion (14.2% vs. 2.1%, p < 0.001) and higher respiratory rate (24/min vs. 21/min, p = 0.014; respiratory rate > 30/min in 17.1% patients vs. 7.5%, p = 0.005). The only difference in ED management appeared in the use of ventilatory support: 78.3% of EMS patients vs. 67.5% of non- EMS patients received supplementary oxygen (p = 0.007), and non-invasive ventilation was administered to 12.5% of EMS patients vs. 4.2% non- EMS patients (p = 0.002). EMS patients were more often hospitalized (82.4% vs. 65.9%, p < 0.001), had higher in-hospital mortality (8.7% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.014) and 30-day mortality (14.3% vs. 4.9%, p < 0.001). The use of EMS was an independent predictor of 30-day mortality (OR = 2.54, 95% CI 1.11-5.81, p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: Most acute heart failure patients arrive at ED by EMS. These patients suffer from more severe respiratory distress and receive more often ventilatory support. EMS use is an independent predictor of 30-day mortality.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services , Heart Failure , Aged, 80 and over , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Heart Failure/therapy , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Patient Admission
2.
Emerg Med Australas ; 33(1): 58-66, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32748553

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) is a frequent cause of dyspnoea in EDs, and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. We described and compared the management of this disease in Europe and Oceania/South-East Asia (SEA) cohorts. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study with three time points in Europe and Oceania/SEA. We included in this manuscript patients presenting to EDs with dyspnoea and a diagnosis of LRTI in ED. We collected comorbidities, chronic medication, clinical signs at arrival, laboratory parameters, ED management and patient outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 1389 patients were included, 773 in Europe and 616 in SEA. The European cohort had more comorbidities including chronic heart failure, obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and smoking. Levels of inflammatory markers were higher in Europe. There were more patients with inflammatory markers in Europe and more hypercapnia in Oceania/SEA. The use of antibiotics was higher in SEA (72.2% vs 61.8%, P < 0.001) whereas intravenous diuretics, non-invasive and invasive ventilation were higher in Europe. Intensive care unit admission rate was 9.9% in Europe cohort and 3.4% in Oceania/SEA cohort. ED mortality was 1% and overall in-hospital mortality was 8.7% with no differences between regions. CONCLUSIONS: More patients with LRTI in Europe presented with cardio-respiratory comorbidities, they received more adjunct therapies and had a higher intensive care unit admission rate than patients from Oceania/SEA, although mortality was similar between the two cohorts.


Subject(s)
Dyspnea , Respiratory Tract Infections , Dyspnea/epidemiology , Dyspnea/etiology , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Prospective Studies , Respiratory Tract Infections/drug therapy , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome
3.
Turk J Med Sci ; 50(8): 1879-1886, 2020 12 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32562519

ABSTRACT

Background/aim: To describe seasonal variations in epidemiology, management, and short-term outcomes of patients in Europe presenting to an emergency department (ED) with a main complaint of dyspnea. Materials and methods: Anobservational prospective cohort study was performed in 66 European EDs which included consecutive patients presenting to EDs with dyspnea as the main complaint during 3 72-h study periods. Data were collected on demographics, comorbidities, chronic treatment, prehospital treatment, mode of arrival of patient to ED, clinical signs at admission, treatment in the ED, ED diagnosis, discharge from ED, and in-hospital outcome. Results: The study included 2524 patients with a median age of 69 (53­80) years old. Of the patients presented, 991 (39.3%) were in autumn, 849 (33.6%) were in spring, and 48 (27.1%) were in winter. The winter population was significantly older (P < 0.001) and had a lower rate of ambulance arrival to ED (P < 0.001). In the winter period, there was a higher rate for lower respiratory tract infection (35.1%), and patients were more hypertensive, more hypoxic, and more hyper/hypothermic compared to other seasons. The ED mortality was about 1% and, in hospital, mortality for admitted patients was 7.4%. Conclusion: The analytic method and the outcome of this study may help to guide the allocation of ED resources more efficiently and to recommend seasonal ED management protocols based on the seasonal trend of dyspneic patients.


Subject(s)
Dyspnea/epidemiology , Dyspnea/therapy , Emergency Service, Hospital , Seasons , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ambulances/statistics & numerical data , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bronchodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Diuretics/therapeutic use , Dyspnea/physiopathology , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/methods , Prospective Studies
4.
Intern Med J ; 50(2): 200-208, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30989793

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are common in emergency departments (ED). Guidelines recommend administration of inhaled bronchodilators, systemic corticosteroids and antibiotics along with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for patients with respiratory acidosis. AIM: To determine compliance with guideline recommendations for patients treated for COPD in ED in Europe (EUR) and South East Asia/Australasia (SEA) and to compare management and outcomes. METHODS: In each region, an observational prospective cohort study was performed that included patients presenting to ED with the main complaint of dyspnoea during three 72-h periods. This planned sub-study included those with an ED primary discharge diagnosis of COPD. Data were collected on demographics, clinical features, treatment, disposition and in-hospital mortality. We determined overall compliance with guideline recommendations and compared treatments and outcome between regions. RESULTS: A total of 801 patients was included from 122 ED (66 EUR and 46 SEA). Inhaled bronchodilators were administered to 80.3% of patients, systemic corticosteroids to 59.5%, antibiotics to 44 and 60.6% of patients with pH <7.3 received NIV. The proportion administered systemic corticosteroids was higher in SEA (EUR vs SEA for all comparisons; 52 vs 66%, P < 0.001) as was administration of antibiotics (40 vs 49%, P = 0.02). Rates of NIV and mechanical ventilation were similar. Overall in-hospital mortality was 4.2% (SEA 3.9% vs EUR 4.5%, P = 0.77). CONCLUSION: Compliance with guideline recommended treatments, in particular administration of corticosteroids and NIV, was sub-optimal in both regions. Improved compliance has the potential to improve patient outcome.


Subject(s)
Emergency Treatment , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Australasia , Emergency Service, Hospital , Europe , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis
5.
Emerg Med Australas ; 31(5): 756-762, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30806041

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Asthma exacerbations are common presentations to ED. Key guideline recommendations for management include administration of inhaled bronchodilators, systemic corticosteroids and titrated oxygen therapy. Our aim was to compare management and outcomes between patients treated for asthma in Europe (EUR) and South East Asia/Australasia (SEA) and compliance with international guidelines. METHODS: In each region, prospective, interrupted time series studies were performed including adult (age >18 years) patients presenting to ED with the main complaint of dyspnoea during three 72 h periods. This was a planned sub-study that included those with an ED primary diagnosis of asthma. Data was collected on demographics, clinical features, treatment in ED, diagnosis, disposition and in-hospital outcome. The results of interest were differences in treatment and outcome between EUR and SEA cohorts. RESULTS: Five hundred and eighty-four patients were identified from 112 EDs (66 EUR and 46 SEA). The cohorts had similar demographics and co-morbidity patterns, with 89% of the cohort having a previous diagnosis of asthma. There were no significant differences in treatment between EUR and SEA patients - inhaled beta-agonists were administered in 86% of cases, systemic corticosteroids in 66%, oxygen therapy in 44% and antibiotics in 20%. Two thirds of patients were discharged home from the ED. CONCLUSION: The data suggests that compliance with guideline-recommended therapy in both regions, particularly corticosteroid administration, is sub-optimal. It also suggests over-use of antibiotics.


Subject(s)
Asthma/therapy , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/methods , Treatment Outcome , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Asia, Southeastern/epidemiology , Asthma/epidemiology , Australasia/epidemiology , Bronchodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Interrupted Time Series Analysis , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies
6.
Eur J Emerg Med ; 26(5): 345-349, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30169464

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to describe the epidemiology and management of dyspneic patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) in an international patient population. Our secondary objective was to compare the EURODEM and AANZDEM patient populations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An observational prospective cohort study was carried out in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region. The study included consecutive patients presenting to EDs with dyspnea as the main complaint. Data were collected on demographics, comorbidities, chronic treatment, clinical signs and investigations, treatment in the ED, diagnosis, and disposition from ED. RESULTS: A total of 5569 patients were included in the study. The most common ED diagnoses were lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) (24.9%), heart failure (HF) (17.3%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation (15.8%), and asthma (10.5%) in the overall population. There were more LRTI, HF, and COPD exacerbations in the EURODEM population, whereas asthma was more frequent in the AANZDEM population. ICU admission rates were 5.5%. ED mortality was 0.6%. The overall in-hospital mortality was 5.0%. In-hospital mortality rates were 8.7% for LRTI, 7.6% for HF, and 5.6% for COPD patients. CONCLUSION: Dyspnea as a symptom in the ED has high ward and ICU admission rates. A variety of causes of dyspnea were observed in this study, with chronic diseases accounting for a major proportion.


Subject(s)
Asthma/epidemiology , Dyspnea/epidemiology , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Pneumonia/epidemiology , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Asia/epidemiology , Asthma/diagnosis , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Dyspnea/diagnosis , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Hospital Mortality/trends , Humans , Internationality , Male , Middle Aged , Pacific Islands/epidemiology , Pneumonia/diagnosis , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/epidemiology , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Distribution
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL