Chemotherapy of breast cancer in the elderly.

Breast cancer arises in about 48% of patients older than 65 years and more than 30% occurs in those over 70 years being the leading cause of cancer-related death in women older than 65. Elderly patients tolerate chemotherapy poorly compared to their younger counterpart because of progressive reduction of organ function and comorbidities related to age. For this reason, the elderly have been excluded from or underrepresented in most cancer studies and, in clinical practice, they often receive inadequate and untested treatments. For adjuvant chemotherapy, a low percentage of patients over 70 years of age were included in few trials and always in a proportion much lower than the prevalence of cancer in that age group. Adjuvant chemotherapy, preferably including an anthracycline especially in patients with HER-2/neu-positive tumours, seems to be beneficial in older women who have substantial risk of dying of breast cancer. To date even if there is no specifically randomised study, single-agent chemotherapy probably might be considered a reasonable treatment for advanced breast cancer in the elderly. One of the actual main field of clinical research in the treatment of breast cancer is the role of targeted therapies. Chronologic age is a risk factor for toxicities such as myelosuppression and mucositis, and older patients may require more supportive care. In order to plan medical treatment in breast cancer elderly patients is mandatory to practice a comprehensive geriatric assessment that includes evaluation of comorbidities, functional dependence, socio-economic, emotional and cognitive conditions, an estimate of life expectancy and recognition of frailty. The authors review the literature regarding age-specific chemotherapeutic issues in the management of breast cancer elderly patients.

Carboplatin plus paclitaxel in extensive small cell lung cancer: a multicentre phase 2 study.

A multicentre phase 2 trial (single-stage design) was undertaken to test the efficacy and toxicity of carboplatin (AUC 6 according to Calvert) plus paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)3-h infusion) every 4 weeks in the first line treatment of patients affected by extensive small cell lung cancer. The primary end-point of the trial was the objective response rate. 31 objective responses among 50 patients were considered necessary to proceed to a phase 3 trial. 48 patients were enrolled (median age 59 years). Treatment was very well tolerated. 3 patients (6.2%) had a complete response and 23 (47.9%) a partial response, for an overall response rate of 54.2% (95% CI: 39.2-68.6). Median time to progression was 5.7 months (95% CI: 5.2-6.2). Median survival was 9.6 months (95% CI: 7.2-14.6), with a median follow-up time of alive patients of 12 months. At 1 year, the probability of being progression-free or alive was 0.16 and 0.43, respectively. In conclusion, carboplatin plus paclitaxel as given in the present study is very well tolerated but not sufficiently active to warrant phase 3 comparison with standard chemotherapy regimens.

Thoracic radiotherapy and daily vinorelbine as radiosensitizer in locally advanced non small cell lung cancer: a phase I study.

Experimental studies have shown that vinorelbine is a powerful radiosensitizer in vitro. To date, no reports on clinical activity of the single agent vinorelbine as radiosensitizer have been published. The aim of the present phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vinorelbine administered daily concurrently with thoracic radiotherapy, with or without amifostine support, in the treatment of locally advanced non small cell lung cancer. In vitro studies have shown that vinorelbine can potentiate the antitumor effects of radiation therapy. Amifostine is a sulphydril compound that has shown to protect normal tissues from chemotherapy and radiotherapy-induced toxicities. Radiotherapy lasted 6 weeks and the total dose was 55 Gy. The daily fraction was 1.8 Gy, administered 5 days a week for 5 weeks and increased to 2.0 Gy during the sixth and last week. Concurrent vinorelbine was administered daily with a planned escalation of the dose from 4, to 5 and 6 mg/m(2). Fourteen patients were enrolled in the study. The first dose of vinorelbine was 4 mg/m(2) and it showed to be feasible without dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Instead, the second dose level of 5 mg/m(2) was unfeasible because three out of six patients had DLT (grade 4 neutropenia, treatment interruption longer than 2 weeks for prolonged grade 2 neutropenia and treatment interruption longer than 2 weeks for prolonged grade 3 esophagitis together with grade 4 dyspnea). At that time, the study continued adding amifostine to vinorelbine in order to increase its MTD. Amifostine was administered by means of subcutaneous injection 15 min before each radiotherapy fraction at the fixed dose of 300 mg/m(2). However, 5 mg/m(2) of vinorelbine were considered unfeasible even with amifostine support because three out of five patients showed DLT (grade 4 neutropenia, febrile grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 liver toxicity). Among 14 patients enrolled in the study, eight completed the planned treatment because six patients experienced DLT, which determined treatment interruption. Overall, four partial and two complete responses were observed. Two partial and one complete response were observed in those three patients who had been treated with the first dose of vinorelbine. In conclusion, our data show that the MTD of daily vinorelbine is 4 mg/m(2). Therefore, this is the recommended dose of daily vinorelbine to be administered with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in a phase II trial. Finally, amifostine administered subcutaneously failed to increase the MTD of daily vinorelbine.

Amifostine plus cisplatin plus vinorelbine in the treatment of advanced non small cell lung cancer: a multicenter phase II study.

PURPOSE: to evaluate the activity and toxicity of the combination cisplatin plus vinorelbine plus amifostine in advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: a two-stage Simon design was applied. To proceed after the first stage, responses from seven of 19 patients were needed. Overall, 17 responses from 40 treated patients were required to comply with the design parameter. Inclusion criteria were cyto-histologically proven stage IIIB-IV NSCLC; age of 70 years or less; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 or less; normal cardiac, hepatic, renal and bone marrow functions; and no previous chemotherapy. Patients were staged by physical examination, biochemistry, chest radiograph, brain, thoracic and abdominal computed tomographic (CT) scans, and bone scan. All patients received cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) intravenously (iv) day 1, vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) iv days 1-8-15-22, amifostine 740 mg/m(2) iv day 1 every 4 weeks up to six cycles. Eleven of 40 enrolled patients were stage IIIB and 29 stage IV, with a median age of 57 years (range, 38-70 years). RESULTS: all patients were evaluable for response and toxicity (intention to treat analysis). We observed 20 (50%) objective responses, with four (10%) complete responses. Median time to progression was 20 weeks, and median survival was 45 weeks. The toxicity was manageable. The reported main toxicities were neutropenia grade 4 in 10% of patients, grade 1 and grade 3 nephrotoxicity both in 5% of patients and grade 1 amifostine-related hypotension in 15% of patients. CONCLUSION: these data show that cisplatin plus vinorelbine plus amifostine is an active and feaseable regimen in stage IIIB-IV NSCLC. A phase III trial comparing cisplatin plus vinorelbine versus cisplatin plus vinorelbine plus amifostine in advanced NSCLC is warranted.

Single agent docetaxel plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) in previously treated patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer. A phase II study and review of the literature.

The use of salvage chemotherapy in advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is controversial. However, many patients need to be treated in order to achieve relief of their symptoms. Docetaxel (taxotere) is one of the most active drugs for the treatment of advanced NSCLC and several studies have also shown its effectiveness in pretreated patients. In the present study, 23 patients were treated in order to evaluate both the effectiveness and toxicity of the single agent docetaxel. Furthermore, granulocyte-colony stimulating (G-CSF) factor was administered in order to reduce neutropenia related to docetaxel. Docetaxel was administered intravenously at a dose of 100 mg/m2, on day 1, and it was repeated every 3 weeks. G-CSF was administered for primary prophylaxis of neutropenia at the standard dose of 30 mg/day from day 4 to day 10 of each cycle. The treatment was tolerated well and 5 (21.7%) partial responses were obtained. The median time to progression and the median survival time were 3 and 5 months, respectively. The main side effect noted was fatigue, the intensity of which was grade 2 in 43.4% of cases and grade 3 in 8.7% of patients, respectively. One patient (4.3%) had grade 4 cutaneous toxicity. No cases of grade 4 neutropenia were reported. In conclusion, docetaxel is active when used for salvage chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC whilst concurrent primary prophylactic administration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor seems to decrease severe neutropenia.

The role of granulocyte growth factors in the treatment of non small cell lung cancer.

In the past years granulocyte growth factors have been introduced in clinical practice. Their use is intended to reduce the risk of infection related to chemotherapy and to increase the dose-intensity of chemotherapy agents. Very few randomized trials have been reported in advanced non small cell lung cancer on chemotherapy plus or minus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. No benefit for granulocyte growth factors use was observed in terms of response rate and survival. Recently, several investigators used growth factors to support new promising drug combinations including vinorelbine, gemcitabine, taxol or taxotere. However, outside controlled clinical trials the role of granulocyte growth factors in the treatment of non small cell lung cancer should be within the American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines.

Single-agent gemcitabine as second-line treatment in patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Although the use of salvage chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is controversial, pretreated symptomatic patients often need some kind of treatment to achieve symptoms relief. Gemcitabine is one of the most active new drugs in advanced NSCLC and preliminary reports suggest that it is active also in patients previously treated with platinum compounds. AIM: to evaluate activity and toxicity and the effect on quality of life of gemcitabine in platinum-pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: single-stage phase 2 trial with p0 = 5%, p1 = 20%, alfa = 5%, beta = 10%; 34 patients required and 4 objective responses expected to warrant further studies. Gemcitabine was administered at dose of 1000 mg/m2, i.v., d 18-15, every 4 weeks, for a maximum of 6 cycles. Quality of life was measured by EORTC C-30 and LC-13 questionnaires. RESULTS: from September 1996 to July 1998, 30 patients have been enrolled. There were 6 (20% exact 95% CI 8-39%) partial responses (2 responses were in pts with brain metastases and 2 in patients progressed during first-line chemotherapy). All patients (but one died because myocardial infarction, progressed; median time to progression was 10 weeks (95% CI 7-12); 28 patients died; median survival was 22 weeks (95% CI 17-29). Quality of life analysis showed no significant change but for the improvement of cough after 3 cycles of chemotherapy. There was no severe toxicity. CONCLUSION: gemcitabine is active as second line for patients with advanced NSCLC who received platinum-based first line treatment. In view of such results randomized trials comparing gemcitabine versus best supportive care are warranted.