ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Alcohol-related cirrhosis (ALD cirrhosis) has a weaker effect on acute myocardial infarction (MI) than on other arterial or venous thromboses, and the reasons for this pattern are unclear. This study aimed to identify risk factors of MI amongst patients with ALD cirrhosis. METHODS: This nationwide register-based nested case-control study was conducted within a cohort of all Danish patients diagnosed with ALD cirrhosis from 2000-2019. Patients with first-time MI after diagnosis of ALD cirrhosis were identified as cases, and matching cohort members (10:1) with no history of MI, using risk-set sampling. We selected candidate risk factors a priori and used conditional logistic regression to study the association between them and the adjusted odds ratio of MI. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We included 373 cases and 3,730 controls. We identified the following risk factors for MI: hospitalization for infection (adjusted odds ratio 2.26 [95% CI 1.38-3.71]), recent surgery (adjusted odds ratio 1.82 [95% CI 1.18-2.81]), history of atherosclerosis (adjusted odds ratio 1.89 [95% CI 1.39-2.57]), cardiac ischemia (adjusted odds ratio 6.23 [95% CI 4.30-9.04]), heart failure (adjusted odds ratio 2.83 [95% CI 1.90-4.22]) or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (adjusted odds ratio 2.26 [95% CI 1.62-3.17]). Use of anticoagulants had a protective effect (adjusted odds ratio 0.47 [95% CI 0.25-0.91]). Our findings contribute to the understanding of risk factors for MI in patients with ALD cirrhosis. They may have clinical implications e.g. for the decision to offer thromboprophylaxis.
Subject(s)
Liver Cirrhosis, Alcoholic , Myocardial Infarction , Humans , Denmark/epidemiology , Male , Case-Control Studies , Female , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Aged , Liver Cirrhosis, Alcoholic/complications , Registries , Logistic Models , Adult , Odds RatioABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Insights into risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among patients with alcohol-related cirrhosis (ALD cirrhosis) are important for decisions about HCC surveillance. We studied the effects of continued hazardous alcohol use in ALD cirrhosis on HCC risk. METHODS: Within a nationwide registry-based cohort of patients with ALD cirrhosis, we compared HCC risk between patients with a continued hazardous alcohol use and matched comparators. We used Fine-Gray regression to compare the risk of HCC and Cox regression to compare all-cause mortality. We also included patients with ALD cirrhosis in a clinical case-control study. Cases had HCC, and controls did not. Alcohol use was quantified using the AUDIT-C-questionnaire. Logistic regression was used to analyze the association between hazardous alcohol use and HCC risk. RESULTS: In the registry-based study, we included 8,616 patients with continued hazardous alcohol use and 8,616 matched comparators. Patients with a continued hazardous alcohol use had a lower HCC risk (subdistribution hazard ratio: 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57 - 0.72) and higher mortality (hazard ratio: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.56 - 1.67). In the clinical study, we included 146 patients with ALD cirrhosis of whom 53 had newly diagnosed HCC. Hazardous alcohol use was insignificantly associated with a lower HCC risk (odds ratio: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.25 - 1.46). CONCLUSIONS: Hazardous alcohol use in patients with ALD cirrhosis is associated with higher mortality and, consequently, a lower HCC risk. Even if alcohol is carcinogenic, HCC surveillance will therefore likely be more effective in patients with ALD cirrhosis without a hazardous alcohol use.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Liver Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/etiology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/complications , Liver Neoplasms/etiology , Liver Neoplasms/complications , Case-Control Studies , Liver Cirrhosis, Alcoholic/complications , Liver Cirrhosis, Alcoholic/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Liver Cirrhosis/complicationsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic inflammatory liver disease associated with an increased prevalence of extrahepatic autoimmune diseases and an increased mortality compared with the general population. The contribution of extrahepatic autoimmune diseases to the increased mortality has not been clarified. Our aim was to determine the effect of extrahepatic autoimmune diseases on mortality in AIH patients. METHODS: This nationwide register-based cohort study included all Danish patients diagnosed with AIH between 1995 and 2019. We examined the presence of extrahepatic autoimmune diseases and compared the mortality between AIH patients with and without extrahepatic autoimmune diseases. We adjusted our analysis for age, sex, calendar year of AIH diagnosis, cirrhosis, cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and ischaemic heart disease. RESULTS: We included 2479 AIH patients of whom 19.8% had one extrahepatic autoimmune disease and 3.3% had multiple. The adjusted 10-year cumulative mortality was 27.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 25.2-29.4) for patients with extrahepatic autoimmune diseases and 21.6% (95% CI: 19.9-23.6) for patients without. The adjusted mortality hazard ratio was 1.30 (95% CI: 1.12-1.52) for AIH patients with versus without extrahepatic autoimmune diseases; it was 1.25 (95% CI: 1.06-1.48) for patients with one extrahepatic autoimmune disease and 1.54 (95% CI: 1.15-2.05) for those with more than one. CONCLUSIONS: Extrahepatic autoimmune diseases increased the mortality in patients with AIH. Patients with multiple extrahepatic autoimmune diseases had a higher mortality than patients with just one extrahepatic autoimmune disease.