ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Knowledge of fetal physiology during labor has been largely generated from animal models. Our team recently developed a new index to assess parasympathetic activity using different experimental protocols to obtain acidosis. The objective of the present study was to discuss the different protocols and to review other models proposed in the literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pregnant ewes underwent a surgical procedure at the 123±2 days gestational age (term=145 days). Three experimental protocols were used: protocol A consisted of 25%, 50% and 75% umbilical cord occlusion (UCO) for 20min. Protocol B consisted of partial 75% UCO until reaching a pH<7.10. Protocol C consisted of brief, repetitive complete occlusion until severe acidosis occurred. Hemodynamic and blood gas parameters were compared to those of the stability period before UCO. RESULTS: Protocol A led to a progressive response depending on the degree of occlusion (decrease in fetal heart rate, arterial hypertension and pH). Protocol B led to severe acidosis, although the duration of UCO varied per animal. Protocol C also progressively led to acidosis. We observed high inter individual variability in the acidosis response. CONCLUSION: Pregnant ewes are a relevant model for exploring fetal response to acidosis. The frequency of UCO and partial or complete occlusion should be adapted to the expected effects. Knowledge of these protocols is important to respect ethical guidelines and to reduce the required number of animals. Moreover, it is important to consider the high individual variability of the acidosis response in the interpretation of the results.
Subject(s)
Acidosis/physiopathology , Baroreflex/physiology , Disease Models, Animal , Embryo, Mammalian/physiopathology , Heart Rate, Fetal/physiology , Parasympathetic Nervous System/physiopathology , Animals , Female , Pregnancy , SheepSubject(s)
Breech Presentation/surgery , Cesarean Section, Repeat , Uterine Rupture/surgery , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Adnexal Diseases/complications , Adnexal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Apgar Score , Birth Injuries/etiology , Birth Injuries/physiopathology , Breech Presentation/diagnostic imaging , Breech Presentation/physiopathology , Emergency Service, Hospital , Endometriosis/complications , Endometriosis/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Pelvic Pain/etiology , Pelvis , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, Third , Premature Birth/etiology , Remission, Spontaneous , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Uterine Rupture/diagnostic imaging , Uterine Rupture/physiopathologyABSTRACT
In term breech deliveries, vaginal delivery can be safely envisioned in some conditions (related to patient selection and obstetrician experience). Very few data are currently available, however, about the possibility of inducing labor in these situations. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and safety of induction of labor for breech presentations. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative hospital-based study of a continuous series of term breech deliveries from 2000 to 2010. The condition of term breech newborns delivered vaginally after induction of labor was compared to that of their counterparts delivered vaginally after spontaneous labor. RESULTS: During the study period, 96 women with term fetuses in breech presentations had labor induced and 501 in spontaneous labor had attempted vaginal deliveries. Compared with spontaneous labor, induction was not associated with a significantly higher rate of cesarean delivery during labor (20.8 vs 14.8%, P=0.14), nor with poorer neonatal condition, defined either as moderate acidosis (pH<7.15; 21.6 vs 19.8%, P=0.71) or composite neonatal morbidity (2.1 vs 0.6%, P=0.16). CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that, compared with spontaneous labor, neither cervical ripening nor oxytocin induction of labor is associated with either a poorer neonatal prognosis or an excess rate of obstetric complications in term breech births, and that the success rate of induction is satisfactory.
Subject(s)
Breech Presentation , Labor, Induced , Term Birth , Adult , Apgar Score , Blood Chemical Analysis , Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Delivery, Obstetric , Female , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Different classification of fetal heart rate (FHR) pattern have been proposed: FHR classified as either "reassuring" or "non-reassuring", the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) published in 2008 a 3-tier system, the French College of Gynecology and Obstetrics (CNGOF) recommended in 2013 a 5-tier system and recently in 2015, the Federation International of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) proposed a new classification based on a 3-tier system. Our objective was to assess the inter-observer reliability of these 4 existing classifications. STUDY DESIGN: Four observers reviewed 100 FHR without clinical information. FHR were obtained from term singleton pregnancies. Fetal heart rate patterns were classified by one 2-tier ("reassuring vs. non-reassuring"), two 3-tier (NICHD 2008 and FIGO 2015), and one 5-tier (CNGOF 2013) fetal heart classifications. RESULTS: The global agreement between observers was moderate for each classification: 0.58 (0.40-0.74) for the 2-tier, 0.48 (0.37-0.58) for the NICHD 2008, 0.58 (0.53-0.63) for the CNGOF 2013 and 0.59 (0.49-0.67) for the FIGO 2015 classification. When FHR was classified as reassuring, it was classified as normal in 85.5% for the NICHD 2008 and in 94.5% for the FIGO 2015. For the CNGOF 2013, 65.0% were classified as normal and 32.5% as quasi normal. There was strong concordance between FIGO category I and "reassuring" FHR (kappa=0.95). CONCLUSION: Inter-observer agreement of FHR interpretation is moderate whatever the classification used. To evaluate the superior interest of one classification, it will be interesting to compare their impact on need of second line techniques and on neonatal outcome.
Subject(s)
Cardiotocography , Fetal Distress/classification , Fetal Distress/diagnosis , Fetal Monitoring , Heart Rate, Fetal/physiology , Cardiotocography/classification , Cardiotocography/standards , Cardiotocography/statistics & numerical data , Female , Fetal Monitoring/classification , Fetal Monitoring/standards , Fetal Monitoring/statistics & numerical data , Gestational Age , Humans , Observer Variation , Pregnancy , Reproducibility of Results , Terminology as TopicSubject(s)
Breech Presentation , Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , VacuumABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: After verification of the eligibility criteria and with an obstetrician familiar with the specific maneuvers likely to be needed, vaginal delivery of breech presentations is possible. If problems arise during the active pushing phase of labor, vacuum extraction has been described in the literature for this uncommon condition with limited series. The aim of this study is to assess retrospectively vacuum extraction in frank breech presentation in our center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study of trials of vaginal delivery of fetuses in breech presentation at term compares cases according to whether they did or did not use a vacuum extraction. RESULTS: During a two-year period, 83 patients, whom had trials of vaginal delivery in breech presentations, reached the active pushing/bearing down stage after complete cervical dilatation. Vacuum assistance was applied in six of these (7.2 %). The failure rate for vaginal delivery was significantly higher in the group with compared to without vacuum extraction (33.3 % versus 6.5 %, P<0.05). Moreover, the mean pH at birth was significantly lower in the group with vacuum extraction (7.12±0.11 versus 7.20±0.08, P<0.05), and these infants more frequently had deep cutaneous injuries (66.7 % versus 26.0 %, P<0.05). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: In fetuses in breech presentation, when vaginal delivery failed, it seems to be safer for the fetuses to perform caesarean section rather than attempt vacuum extraction.
Subject(s)
Breech Presentation , Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical , Adult , Cesarean Section , Female , Fetal Blood/chemistry , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Skin/injuriesABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION: Accurate preoperative staging of early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) is necessary to avoid under or over surgical treatment. The objective is to determine the rate of understaging and to evaluate the accuracy of different methods: hysteroscopy-curettage versus endometrial biopsy in predicting the final stage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective single-centre study led from 2000 to 2010, included women with EEC preoperatively assessed at low- or intermediate-risk. Understaging was defined as a postoperative FIGO Stage > 1 or a determination of high risk after the final histopathologic diagnosis. RESULTS: The study included 101 women (75 low-risk and 26 intermediate-risk). Final diagnosis was upstaged for 26 of them, more frequently in the presumed intermediate-risk group (57.7% vs 14.7%, p < 0.001). The rate of preoperative understaging was higher in the women with endometrial biopsies than those with curettage (34.5% vs 15.2%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Hysteroscopy-curettage combined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may improve preoperative staging of early-stage EEC, especially for presumed intermediate-risk disease.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Endometrioid/pathology , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Aged , Carcinoma, Endometrioid/surgery , Curettage , Endometrial Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Humans , Hysteroscopy , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: In case of hyperechogenic fetal bowel (HFB), invasive procedures such as amniocentesis are often proposed to detect an underlying cause. Our goal is to study etiologies and prognosis of HFB according to antenatal sonographic findings in order to evaluate the relevance of antenatal assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It is a retrospective monocentric study lead from 2008 to 2012, including all patients with a suspicion of HFB on routine sonography. We analysed the antenatal and neonatal results, distinguishing four situations: isolated HFB, HFB+other digestive anomalies, HFB+vascular pathology, HFB+other associated anomalies. RESULTS: For 149 patients, HBF was confirmed. Sixty-nine were isolated HFB, 24 associated with other digestive anomalies, 16 with vascular pathology and 40 with other anomalies. Pregnancy outcomes were different with 92.8, 41.7, 0 and 45.0% of healthy newborns. In the case of isolated HBF, we noted 2.9% cystic fibrosis and 2.9% congenital infection. CONCLUSION: Isolated HBF seems to have a better prognosis than associated forms. However, prenatal investigations to eliminate cystic fibrosis or congenital infection should be offered and may be initially non-invasive, if a larger series confirmed the absence of dyschromosomy in this population.
Subject(s)
Cystic Fibrosis/epidemiology , Echogenic Bowel/diagnostic imaging , Echogenic Bowel/epidemiology , Fetal Diseases/epidemiology , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/epidemiology , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Female , France , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Prognosis , Ultrasonography, PrenatalABSTRACT
Since its first description in 1980, the Zavanelli maneuver - reintroduction of the fetus in the uterus after failure of maneuver to reduce shoulder dystocia - remains an extraordinary and nearly unknown remedy. We report a Zavanelli maneuver performed in a case of irreducible raising arm of a fetus in breech presentation. Literature and our observation indicate that fetal and neonatal prognosis in Zavanelli maneuver is pretty good if breech presentation. This exceptional situation should remain in mind of obstetricians.