Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters








Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Prev Sci ; 24(Suppl 1): 40-49, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36399222

ABSTRACT

Given increasing opioid overdose mortality rates in the USA over the past 20 years, accelerating the implementation of prevention interventions found to be effective is critical. The Helping End Addiction Long-Term (HEAL) Prevention Cooperative (HPC) is a consortium of research projects funded to implement and test interventions designed to prevent the onset or escalation of opioid misuse among youth and young adults. The HPC offers a unique opportunity to synthesize and share lessons learned from participating research projects' varied implementation experiences, which can facilitate quicker integration of effective prevention interventions into practice. This protocol paper describes our hybrid approach to collecting and analyzing information about the implementation experiences of nine of the HPC research projects while they maintain their focus on assessing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of prevention interventions. To better understand implementation within this context, we will address five research questions: (1) What were the context and approach for implementing the prevention interventions, and how was the overall implementation experience? (2) How representative of the target population are the participants who were enrolled and retained in the research projects' effectiveness trials? (3) For what purposes and how were stakeholders engaged by the research projects? (4) What are the adaptable components of the prevention interventions? And finally, (5) how might implementation of the prevention interventions vary for non-trial implementation? This work will result in intervention-specific and general practical dissemination resources that can help potential adopters and deliverers of opioid misuse prevention make adoption decisions and prepare for successful implementation.


Subject(s)
Behavior, Addictive , Drug Overdose , Opioid-Related Disorders , Adolescent , Young Adult , Humans , Drug Overdose/prevention & control , Opioid-Related Disorders/prevention & control
2.
Prenat Diagn ; 35(10): 999-1004, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26088833

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: A novel algorithm to identify fetal microdeletion events in maternal plasma has been developed and used in clinical laboratory-based noninvasive prenatal testing. We used this approach to identify the subchromosomal events 5pdel, 22q11del, 15qdel, 1p36del, 4pdel, 11qdel, and 8qdel in routine testing. We describe the clinical outcomes of those samples identified with these subchromosomal events. METHODS: Blood samples from high-risk pregnant women submitted for noninvasive prenatal testing were analyzed using low coverage whole genome massively parallel sequencing. Sequencing data were analyzed using a novel algorithm to detect trisomies and microdeletions. RESULTS: In testing 175,393 samples, 55 subchromosomal deletions were reported. The overall positive predictive value for each subchromosomal aberration ranged from 60% to 100% for cases with diagnostic and clinical follow-up information. The total false positive rate was 0.0017% for confirmed false positives results; false negative rate and sensitivity were not conclusively determined. CONCLUSION: Noninvasive testing can be expanded into the detection of subchromosomal copy number variations, while maintaining overall high test specificity. In the current setting, our results demonstrate high positive predictive values for testing of rare subchromosomal deletions.


Subject(s)
Gene Deletion , Genome, Human , Maternal Serum Screening Tests , Female , Humans , Pregnancy
3.
Leukemia ; 22(4): 723-9, 2008 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18185522

ABSTRACT

A 5-year-old boy who initially presented with ALL and relapsed 4 months later with AML was found to have an add(19) in the leukemia cells. FISH revealed that the add(19) was really a cryptic t(l2;l9)(p13.3;p13.3) interrupting E2A (TCF3). Nucleotide sequences of cloned genomic fragments with the E2A rearrangements revealed that the der(12) contained E2A joined to an intron of the NOLI (p120) gene. Reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR of patient lymphoblast RNA showed expression of in-frame fusion cDNAs consisting of most of NOL1 fused to the 3' portion of E2A that encoded part of the second transcriptional activation domain and the DNA binding and protein dimerization motifs. The reciprocal der(19) E2A genomic rearrangements included 5' regions of E2A joined to an intron of the ZNF384 (NMP4, CIZ) gene, located approximately 450 kb centromeric to NOL1 on chromosome 12. RT-PCR showed expression of in-frame E2A-ZNF384 fusion cDNAs. To our knowledge, this is the second report of a chromosome translocation in leukemia resulting in two different gene fusions. This is the first report of expression of E2A fusion protein that includes the DNA binding and protein dimerization domains due to a more proximal break in E2A compared to those described previously.


Subject(s)
Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors/genetics , Leukemia/genetics , Nuclear Proteins/genetics , Trans-Activators/genetics , Acute Disease , Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors/chemistry , Binding Sites , Child, Preschool , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 12 , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 19 , DNA/metabolism , Dimerization , Gene Rearrangement , Humans , Male , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics , Translocation, Genetic , tRNA Methyltransferases
4.
Leukemia ; 19(5): 806-13, 2005 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15744350

ABSTRACT

We analyzed the TS-2 acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cell line that contains a t(1;19)(q23;p13.3) but lacks E2A-PBX1 fusion typically present in leukemias with this translocation. We found that the t(1;19) in TS-2 fuses the 19p13 gene DAZAP1 (Deleted in Azoospermia-Associated Protein 1) to the 1q23 gene MEF2D (Myocyte Enhancer Factor 2D), leading to expression of reciprocal in-frame DAZAP1/MEF2D and MEF2D/DAZAP1 transcripts. MEF2D is a member of the MEF2 family of DNA binding proteins that activate transcription of genes involved in control of muscle cell differentiation, and signaling pathways that mediate response to mitogenic signals and survival of neurons and T-lymphocytes. DAZAP1 is a novel RNA binding protein expressed most abundantly in the testis. We demonstrate that MEF2D/DAZAP1 binds avidly and specifically to DNA in a manner indistinguishable from that of native MEF2D and is a substantially more potent transcriptional activator than MEF2D. We also show that DAZAP1/MEF2D is a sequence-specific RNA-binding protein. MEF2D has been identified as a candidate oncogene in murine retroviral insertional mutagenesis studies. Our data implicate MEF2D in human cancer and suggest that MEF2D/DAZAP1 and/or DAZAP1/MEF2D contribute to leukemogenesis by altering signaling pathways normally regulated by wild-type MEF2D and DAZAP1.


Subject(s)
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 19/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 1/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/physiology , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/genetics , RNA-Binding Proteins/physiology , Transcription Factors/physiology , Cell Line, Tumor , Cloning, Molecular , DNA/metabolism , DNA-Binding Proteins/chemistry , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Humans , MADS Domain Proteins , MEF2 Transcription Factors , Molecular Sequence Data , Myogenic Regulatory Factors , RNA/metabolism , RNA-Binding Proteins/chemistry , RNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Transcription Factors/chemistry , Transcription Factors/genetics , Translocation, Genetic
5.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer ; 31(4): 303-15, 2001 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11433521

ABSTRACT

Recently developed molecular cytogenetic techniques for karyotyping are providing new and important insights regarding the chromosomal changes that occur in solid tumors. We used multiplex-FISH to analyze four adenocarcinoma cell lines, PC-3, PPC-1, ALVA-31, and ALVA-41, in which the characterization of a large number of rearranged chromosomes was partially or substantially inconclusive by G-banding. Although the original descriptions of these lines depict them as distinct entities established from different patients, this study demonstrates that these four lines share numerous, highly rearranged chromosomes, strongly supporting the conclusion that they are derived from the same patient material. Our analysis indicates that PPC-1, ALVA-31, and ALVA-41 were derived from PC-3 through mechanisms involving clonal progression represented by sequential changes and clonal diversion represented by differing patterns of changes. Extensive cellular heterogeneity was detected in all four lines, and most rearrangements included segments derived from multiple chromosomes. Each line also showed a set of unique derivative chromosomes. However, a limited number of metaphase cells (approximately 10) was analyzed for each line, and numerous single-cell abnormalities were detected in all of them. Therefore, it is plausible that the number of clonal, shared, and/or unique rearrangements has been underestimated. These cell lines have been utilized as models for understanding the biology of prostate cancer and reportedly differ in their cell physiology. Rather than detracting from their value, a complete understanding of the interrelationships of these lines to one another may provide the opportunity to define the molecular changes that have led to their individual malignant phenotypes.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/genetics , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Prostatic Neoplasms/genetics , Tumor Cells, Cultured/chemistry , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Chromosome Aberrations/genetics , Chromosome Aberrations/pathology , Chromosome Disorders , Clone Cells , Genetic Markers , Humans , Karyotyping , Male , Middle Aged , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Tumor Cells, Cultured/pathology , White People/genetics
6.
Leukemia ; 15(1): 95-102, 2001 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11243406

ABSTRACT

Three rearrangements in ALL disrupt E2A and create E2A fusion proteins: the t(1;19)(q23;p13) and E2A-PBX1, t(17;19)(q22;p13) and E2A-HLF and a cryptic inv(19)(p13;q13) and E2A-FB1. While E2A is fused to PBX1 in most ALLs with a t(1;19), 5-10% of cases have translocations that appear identical, but do not affect E2A or PBX1. Because more intensive therapy improves the outcome of patients with E2A-PBX1positive (1;19) translocations, it is critical to identify this subset of patients so that appropriate therapy can be administered. In addition, there are balanced and unbalanced variants of the t(1;19) and controversy exists regarding the clinical significance of this distinction. We have developed a two-color fluorescence in situ hybridization assay that accurately detects E2A translocations in metaphase and interphase cells, distinguishes between balanced and unbalanced variants and identifies patients with a t(1;19) who lack E2A-PBX1 fusion. We found that clonal microheterogeneity is common in patients with E2A translocations and most patients have mixtures of cells with balanced and unbalanced translocations, suggesting that this distinction represents two ends of a continuum rather than distinct biological entities. These reagents should have widespread clinical utility and be useful for translational and basic research studies involving E2A translocations and this region of chromosome 19p13.


Subject(s)
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17 , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 19 , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 1 , Leukemia/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics , Translocation, Genetic , Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics , Transcription Factors/analysis , Tumor Cells, Cultured
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL