Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and trucut biopsy in the diagnosis of gastric stromal tumors: a randomized crossover study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) has important prognostic and therapeutic implications. The specific diagnosis of GIST has to be based on immunocytochemistry. This study aimed to prospectively compare in a crossover manner the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and EUS-guided trucut biopsy (EUS-TCB) in the specific diagnosis of gastric GISTs. We hypothesized that EUS-TCB is superior to EUS-FNA in this respect. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients with gastric subepithelial tumors suspected on the basis of EUS of being a GIST underwent both EUS-FNA and EUS-TCB. The sequence in which the techniques were employed was randomly assigned to avoid bias. RESULTS: Forty tumors were sampled (mean number of passes: 2.1 +/- 0.9 with EUS-TNB and 1.9 +/- 0.8 with EUS-FNA; P = not significant, NS). Final diagnoses were: GIST (n = 27), carcinoma (n = 2), leiomyoma (n = 1), schwannoma (n = 1), and no diagnosis possible (n = 9). Device failure occurred in 6 patients with EUS-TCB. A cytohistological diagnosis of mesenchymal tumor (n = 29) and carcinoma (n = 2) was made in 70 % of cases by EUS-FNA and in 60 % of cases by EUS-TCB ( P = NS). Among the samples that were adequate, immunohistochemistry could be performed in 74 % of EUS-FNA samples and in 91 % of EUS-TCB samples ( P = 0.025). When inadequate samples were included, the overall diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA was 52 % and that of EUS-TCB was 55 % ( P = NS). There were no complications. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-TCB is not superior to EUS-FNA in GISTs because of the high rate of technical failure of trucut. However, when an adequate sample is obtained with EUS-TCB, immunohistochemical phenotyping is almost always possible. EUS-TCB can be safely performed in this set of patients.

Severe complications limit long-term clinical success of self-expanding metal stents in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) are increasingly being used to treat malignant colorectal obstruction. However, complications have been reported in up to 50% of patients. There is limited information on long-term outcomes of these patients. The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess the long-term clinical success of SEMS in patients with malignant colorectal obstruction in a single tertiary center and to identify possible predictive factors of developing complications. METHODS: A total of 47 attempts to insert colorectal SEMS were made in 47 patients during a 5-year period. Stents of 9-cm length were placed under endoscopic and radiologic monitoring. After 24 h, all patients underwent abdominal X-ray to verify correct positioning of the stent. Patients were followed at the outpatient clinic. RESULTS: Insertion success was achieved in 44 (94%) patients. Acceptable initial colonic decompression was observed in 44 out of 47 (94%) attempts and in all (100%) successfully inserted stents. The stents were placed in the rectum (n=7, 15%), sigmoid (n=33, 70%), left colon (n=4, 9%), or anastomosis (n=3, 6%). The majority of patients had stage IV disease (n=40, 85%). SEMS served as a bridge to scheduled surgery in 9 (20%) patients and as a palliative definitive treatment in 38 (80%) cases. Three patients were lost to follow-up, so the outcome was evaluated in 41 patients. Long-term clinical failure occurred in 21 (51%) patients and was due to complications such as: migration (n=9, 22%), obstruction (n=7, 17%), perforation (n=3, 7%), and tenesmus (n=2, 5%). Perforations occurred 3, 4, and 34 days after insertion, and all patients died. In the bridge-to-surgery group, primary anastomosis was possible in only four of nine patients (44%). Clinical failure was not associated with any tumor-related factor. However, eight of nine patients with stent migration and two of three patients with perforation had been previously treated with chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Placement of SEMS does not seem to be as effective as suggested because of late complications. For patients with potentially curable lesions, the use of colonic stents for malignant obstruction should only be considered when surgery is scheduled shortly after the stent insertion. Moreover, in patients with incurable obstructing colorectal cancer eligible for chemotherapy and a long life expectancy, palliative treatments other than SEMS should be considered.

Wireless capsule endoscopy.

Wireless capsule endoscopy is a new technique that allows complete exploration of the small bowel without external wires. Its role has been analyzed in many small bowel diseases such as obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, Crohn's disease and gastrointestinal polyposis syndromes with promising results. Studies on other pathologies (i.e. small bowel tumour, celiac disease) are under evaluation to define the role of this technique.

Incidence and clinical significance of hyperamylasemia after endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of pancreatic lesions: a prospective and controlled study.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Acute pancreatitis as a complication of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of pancreatic lesions is rarely observed. However, there is little information on the incidence of hyperamylasemia after EUS-FNA of the pancreas and its clinical significance. This study aimed to supply this lack of information. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent EUS-FNA of a pancreatic lesion between October 2004 and October 2005 were studied prospectively. Exclusion criteria were: (i) platelet count under 50,000/mm (3) and/or prothrombin time < 50 %; (ii) performance of surgery, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), a percutaneous biopsy attempt, or another invasive procedure within 7 days before EUS-FNA; (iii) lack of informed consent. Serum amylase levels were determined before and 8 and 24 h after the procedure. Hyperamylasemia was defined by amylase levels above 104 UI/L (and higher than baseline levels) 8 h after the procedure. Acute pancreatitis was defined by upper abdominal pain (with or without nausea and/or vomiting) accompanied by elevation of serum amylase or lipase to at least twice baseline levels. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients underwent EUS-FNA of a pancreatic lesion (58 men, 42 women; mean age 60 +/- 13 years). Eleven patients (11 %) showed hyperamylasemia 8 h after the puncture (298 +/- 293 UI/L, range 105 - 1044 UI/L), but only two of them developed acute mild pancreatitis after EUS-FNA. Hyperamylasemia was not related either to the type of lesion (cystic or solid) or to its location, the duration of the procedure, or the number of passes performed. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatitis after pancreatic EUS-FNA occurs in 2 % of patients, with some more cases of silent hyperamylasemia. This complication may have to be included in the information given to patients for their informed consent.

EUS FNA in intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: There is little information concerning the potential role of fine-needle aspiration guided by endoscopic ultrasonography in the pathologic diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas. METHODOLOGY: Patients with an intraductal papillary mucinous tumor of the pancreas suggested by endoscopic ultrasonography underwent fine-needle aspiration guided by endoscopic ultrasonography in order to investigate the presence of mucin and/or cytologic changes consistent with this diagnosis. A group of 111 patients with other pancreatic lesions explored during the same period of time was used as a control group. RESULTS: Fine-needle aspiration guided by endoscopic ultrasonography was safely performed in 19 patients and supported the diagnosis in 17 of them. Nine out of the 17 patients with suspicion of intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas went to surgery and this diagnosis was confirmed in the resected specimen in all of them. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of EUS FNA in the diagnosis of IPMT were 82%, 100%, 100%, 92% and 94% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Fine-needle aspiration guided by endoscopic ultrasonography is a good technique to support the diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas and should be considered in this group of patients if pathologic confirmation is judged to be necessary.

Prospective assessment of the role of antibiotic prophylaxis in ERCP.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Despite the existence of published recommendations, various studies of antibiotic prophylaxis have reached conflicting conclusions, and controversy exists regarding the role of antibiotic prophylaxis in ERCP. The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy of the intramuscular administration of clindamicine and gentamicine before ERCP. METHODOLOGY: Sixty-one consecutive patients referred for ERCP were prospectively randomized to receive either clindamicine 600mg and gentamicine 80mg, both intramuscularly one hour before the ERCP (group I; 31 patients) or not (group II; 30 patients). Two blood samples were obtained from every patient (just before endoscopy and within 5 minutes of withdrawal of the endoscope) and were incubated for 7 days and examined daily for growth of bacteria. Patients were closely monitored for 7 days after endoscopy to detect the development of infectious complications. RESULTS: Only 7 cultures from 7 patients were positive. Four were obtained post-ERCP (two patients in group I and two in group II) and the remaining three before endoscopy. The post-ERCP isolated bacteria were: Streptococcus mitis, Peptoestreptococcus anaerobious, Moraxella spp and Escherichia coli. Two patients, one from each group, developed post-ERCP cholangitis that were solved with medical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that ERCP induce bacteremia in a small group of patients and suggest that prophylactic administration of clindamicine plus gentamicine does not reduce the incidence of bacteremia and cholangitis, and do not support the routine use of prophylactic antibiotics prior to ERCP.

[Emerging endoscopic techniques. The arrival of virtual histology]. / Técnicas endoscópicas emergentes. La llegada de la histología virtual.

Endoscopic technology has evolved in such a way that gastroenterologists can now visualize and store high-resolution images of the gastrointestinal tract. This has improved the approach to precancerous and cancerous lesions of the gastrointestinal tract and biliary tree. However, certain difficulties remain, especially in relation to diagnosis. In the last few years, multiple techniques have been developed that, using the properties of light, enable an instantaneous histologic diagnosis to be made while endoscopy is being performed. What has been called the "optical biopsy" allows highly exact information to be obtained, both from the morphological and functional point of view. Some of these techniques, such as chromoendoscopy and magnification, are already being performed in clinical practice while others are still under investigation. The aim of the present article is to review the underlying principles and applications of these emerging techniques.

The European panel on the appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy guidelines colonoscopy in an open-access endoscopy unit: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The demand for gastrointestinal endoscopy is increasing in most developed countries, resulting in an important rise in overall costs and waiting lists for endoscopic procedures. Therefore, adherence to appropriate indications for these procedures is essential for the rational use of finite resources in an open-access system. AIM: To assess indications and appropriateness of colonoscopy according to the European Panel on the Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE) criteria. METHODS: From May to June 2004, all consecutive patients referred to our Unit for open-access colonoscopy were considered for inclusion in this prospective study. Appropriateness of each colonoscopy was established according to the EPAGE criteria. In order to evaluate whether appropriateness of use correlated with the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy, relevant endoscopic findings were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 350 consecutive patients were included in the study. In 38 of them, the colonoscopy indication was not listed in the EPAGE guidelines and, consequently, they were not evaluated. In the remaining 312 patients, the indication for the procedure was considered inappropriate in 73 (23%) patients. Both referring doctor characteristics (specialty and health care setting) and patient data (age) correlated with appropriateness of endoscopy. The diagnostic yield was significantly higher for appropriate colonoscopies (42%) than in those judged inappropriate (21%) (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A noteworthy proportion of patients referred for colonoscopy to an open-access endoscopy unit are considered inappropriate because of their indication, with significant differences among specialties. These results suggest that implementation of validated guidelines for its appropriate use could improve this situation and, considering the correlation between appropriateness and diagnostic yield, even contribute to improve the prognosis of patients with colorectal diseases.

[Laparoscopic surgery of gastric cancer]. / Cirugía laparoscópica del cáncer gástrico.

INTRODUCTION: The present state of minimally invasive surgery in gastric cancer is reviewed and its technical aspects are detailed. PATIENTS AND METHOD: The authors provide their personal experience in a non-randomized prospective study, in two different settings (the CHU Charleroi, Belgium and the Hospital of Zumárraga, the Basque Country, Spain) carried out between June 1993 and January 2004. In this study involving 101 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma, the mini-invasive laparoscopic approach was employed as a surgical tool with the "aim of treatment by laparoscopy". The average age of the patients was 67 years (37-83). RESULTS: Postoperativemortality after 60 days was 5 patients; 87 patients were subjected to an oncological follow-up averaging 41 months (7-129). The average of survival observed in the 10 non-resected patients was 4.5 months. The average of survival observed in the 10 patients subjected to a palliative resection was 7.1 months. The actuarial survival after 5 years observed following type RO exeresis was 34%. The 5-years actuarial survival of the resected patients was 29%. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic gastrectomy associated with any type of lymphadenectomy is a significant but safe intervention, with acceptable rates of morbidity and mortality in patients with advanced gastric cancer, who frequently present a bad general status. The long term oncological results are similar to those obtained via laparotomy. More prospective studies are needed that evaluate the results of this approach, both its short-term benefits and the long range oncological result.

Wireless capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: a comparative study with push enteroscopy.

BACKGROUND: The identification and treatment of lesions located in the small intestine in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding is always a clinical challenge. AIM: To examine prospectively the diagnostic precision and the clinical efficacy of capsule endoscopy compared with push enteroscopy in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. METHODS: Forty-two patients (22 men and 20 women) with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (overt bleeding in 26 cases and occult blood loss with chronic anaemia in 16) and normal oesophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy were analysed. All patients were instructed to receive the capsule endoscopy and push enteroscopy was performed within the next 7 days. Both techniques were blindly performed by separate examiners. The diagnostic yield for each technique was defined as the frequency of detection of clinically relevant intestinal lesions carrying potential for bleeding. RESULTS: A bleeding site potentially related to gastrointestinal bleeding or evidence of active bleeding was identified in a greater proportion of patients using capsule endoscopy (74%; 31 of 42) than enteroscopy (19%; eight of 42) (P = 0.05). The most frequent capsule endoscopy findings were: angiodysplasia (45%), fresh blood (23%), jejunal ulcers (10%), ileal inflammatory mucosa (6%) and ileal tumour (6%). No additional intestinal diagnoses were made by enteroscopy. In seven patients (22%), the results obtained with capsule endoscopy led to a successful change in the therapeutic approach. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with push enteroscopy, capsule endoscopy increases the diagnosis yield in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, and allows modification on therapy strategy in a remarkable proportion of patients.

Endoscopic findings in a biennial follow-up program in patients with pernicious anemia.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: It is known that patients with pernicious anemia have a higher risk of gastric neoplasms. However, the optimal endoscopic follow-up in these patients has not been properly defined. This study was aimed to assess the usefulness of an endoscopic follow-up program. METHODOLOGY: We analyzed the endoscopic and histological findings of the first endoscopy performed in a group of 128 patients with the diagnosis of pernicious anemia who were referred to the Endoscopic Unit, and we evaluated the results of the biannual follow-up endoscopies made to 68 of them. RESULTS: The initial endoscopy did not provide evidence of any lesions in 107 patients (83.5%), and polypoid lesions were found in 12 cases (9.4%). The histological results showed gastric dysplasia in 3 patients (2.3%) and carcinoid tumor in 2 cases (1.6%). No cases of gastric carcinoma were found. During the endoscopic follow-up of 68 patients, in 52 of them (76.8%) there were no endoscopic findings, and raised lesions were detected in 8 patients (11.8%). Three cases of gastric dysplasia were found. No cases of gastric carcinoma or carcinoid were detected during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that a biannual endoscopic follow-up in not useful for the early detection of gastric neoplasms in patients with pernicious anemia.

[Role of capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure digestive bleeding]. / Papel de la cápsula endoscópica en los pacientes con hemorragia digestiva de origen indeterminado.

INTRODUCTION: The identification and localization of lesions located in the small intestine that may provoke gastrointestinal bleeding is difficult. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the role of capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure digestive bleeding and to compare the results obtained with those of enteroscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with obscure digestive bleeding (acute hemorrhage in 11 patients and chronic anemia in 10) and normal total fibergastroscopy and fibrocolonoscopy were analyzed. All patients were instructed to receive the capsule and enteroscopy was performed after 1 week. The results obtained using both procedures were independently compared and without knowledge of the results of the other procedure. RESULTS: Visualization of findings potentially related to gastrointestinal bleeding was significantly greater (p < 0.05) using the capsule (14 of 21 patients [66%]) than with enteroscopy (4 of 21 patients [19%]). The most frequent lesions were angiodysplasias and jejunal ulcers. In 4 patients, the results obtained led to a change in therapeutic approach. One patient with jejunal stenosis and two with ileal lesions underwent surgery, which confirmed the diagnosis of Crohn's disease in the first patient and carcinoid tumor in the remaining two. Another patient with evidence of angiodysplasia and bleeding was effectively treated with Argon-beam during enteroscopy. The capsule was well tolerated in all patients. In the patient with jejunal stenosis, capsule extraction was required during surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Capsule endoscopy allows adequate visualization of the entire small intestine and its diagnostic efficacy is greater than that of enteroscopy in patients with obscure digestive bleeding. Moreover, in our series, this procedure allowed modification of therapy in one out of every five patients.

Clinical usefulness of KRAS mutational analysis in the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma by means of endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy.

AIM: To establish the usefulness of KRAS mutational analysis in the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma by comparing this technique with conventional cytology in aspirates obtained by endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration. METHODS: All consecutive patients with pancreatic focal lesions undergoing endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration were included. Samples were obtained with the concurrence of an attendant cytopathologist. Detection of codon-12 KRAS mutations was performed by the restriction fragment length polymorphism-polymerase chain reaction method. The effectiveness of conventional cytology, KRAS mutational analysis and their combination was established with respect to the definitive diagnosis. A cost-effectiveness analysis was also performed. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients had pancreatic adenocarcinoma and 24 patients had other lesions. A total of 136 samples was obtained. In patients in whom specimens were adequate (93% for cytology; 100% for mutational analysis), the specificity of both techniques was 100%, whereas the sensitivity favoured cytology (97% vs. 73%). When inadequate samples were considered as misdiagnosed, a combination of both techniques reached the highest overall accuracy (cytology, 91%; mutational analysis, 84%; combination of both, 98%). CONCLUSIONS: Cytology from aspirates obtained by endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration is the most precise single technique for the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. However, when adequate specimens are not available to reach a cytological diagnosis, the addition of KRAS mutational analysis represents the best strategy.

Follow-up of a large-B-cell pancreatic lymphoma by endoscopic ultrasonography.

Although computed tomography and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) are well-established procedures used to evaluate pancreatic masses, it is well known that imaging techniques alone cannot be used to distinguish between adenocarcinoma and tumors of less common cellular origin, such as primary pancreatic lymphoma. Clinicians must always consider this kind of malignancy in their differential diagnosis since, although rare, its treatment is nonsurgical and it has a better prognosis than adenocarcinoma. Histological examination of focal masses in the pancreas is therefore mandatory in order to establish the best therapeutic approach for every patient. Endoscopic ultrasound has developed as a very useful tool for the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors but could also be considered as a very useful method in the follow-up of these patients after treatment.