Does the urologist keep a central place in the medical information delivered to patients?

INTRODUCTION: Although urologists play an essential role in informing patients, with the ever-increasing use of modern media, a wealth of information sources is now available. The aim of this study was to identify the different sources of information available to urology patients, assess the scale of use of the internet and social networks in this group, and establish the profile of patients for whom a high level of information is crucial. MATERIALS: A questionnaire was given to 500 patients consulting the urology department of a university hospital. RESULTS: Out of the 500 questionnaires, 372 were analysable; the average age of respondents was 62.9years; 73% were men; 66.9% said they used the internet; 57% had received an explanatory document such as an French Urology Association information leaflet, 32.5% had received information from the paramedical team, 28.2% from their regular doctor, 28.2% from health-related websites and 5.9% from the website developed by the French Urology Association. Although 80.3% of patients thought that information received from the urologist was satisfactory, 53.2% of patients would like to receive more information. We did not identify any factors allowing us to determine the typical profile of patients seeking more information. CONCLUSION: Urologists seem to retain their central role in informing patients, but almost half of patients were still seeking additional information after their urology consultation. The increasing use of the internet should encourage urologists to use these new media resources to optimise the information supplied to patients.

Efficacy of the VIRTUE male quadratic sling in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: A retrospective study.

AIM: To assess the efficacy and the impact on the quality of life (QoL) of patients suffering stress urinary incontinence (SUI) treated with VIRTUE © sling. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Retrospective monocenteric study where patients treated with VIRTUE © sling were included between January 2016 and May 2018. The severity of the incontinence was judged based on the number of protection used per day (PPD) and/or on the 24hours pad test into mild, moderate and severe: ≥2 protections and/or <100ml/24h, 3-4 protections and/or 101-200ml/24h, >4 protections and/or>200ml/24h respectively. The criteria of success was achieved when the patient is dry or ameliorated. The ICIQ- UI sf questionnaire was used as a measure of QoL. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were included in this study with mean follow up time of 11 months (range: 3-26). Twenty-nine patients had a radical prostatectomy, 3 had endoscopic treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia, 9 patient had radiotherapy of which one had a complementary focal treatment (HIFU), and two patients had spinal cord injury. The success rate was 83%. The score ICIQ-UI sf showed a statistical difference between the pre and post-operative periods in both success and failure groups (P<0.001). History of radiotherapy, low bladder compliance, and severe incontinence were associated with negative result. Pain was the most recorded post-operative complication and no>grade 2 Clavien Dindo complications were encountered. CONCLUSION: The VIRTUE © sling seems to be an effective, safe tool treating SUI at short term. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Limited usefulness of urinary dipsticks to screen out catheter-associated bacteriuria in ICU patients.

The use of urinary dipsticks to screen out sterile urine specimens was investigated in catheterized ICU patients. During a three-month period, each urine sample quantitatively cultured was concurrently tested at the bedside with a dipstick. A total of 102 urine samples taken from 43 patients were analysed. Thirty-eight of them showed bacterial or yeast growths (incidence rate, 37%). The negative predictive value of the leukocyte esterase pad and/or the nitrate test pad to screen out sterile urine samples was 81%, indicating that dipsticks cannot routinely be proposed to select catheterized ICU patients for quantitative culture of urine.

[Complementary neuromotor examination of infants at risk for sequelae.Why? How?]. / Examen neuromoteur complémentaire des nourrissons à risque de séquelles. Pourquoi? Comment?

In many cases the traditional neurological examination of high risk newborns for neurological problems secondary to perinatal difficulties does not identify easily the absence or the presence of cerebral palsy before walking. To help the neuromoteur follow up in these children, the authors suggest a complementary neuromotor examination that is successful only in normal infants. This examination is done in front of a mirror in the presence of the parents in order to increase the attention of the child, whose participation is necessary for a successful examination. Two motor responses are evaluated: the lateral support on, alternately, right and left superior limbs, and the lateral abduction reaction of the hip of each limb. When normal these two motor responses allow an early affirmation of integrity of motor paths if the examination is performed under carefully controlled conditions.

[Neurological follow-up of newborn infants at risk for cerebral palsy]. / Surveillance neurologique des nouveau-nés à risque d'infirmité motrice cérébrale.

BACKGROUND: Traditional neurological examination of newborns at risk for cerebral palsy (CP) is based on periodic assessment of normal milestones so that the diagnosis of CP can be very late. A complementary neuromotor evaluation based on two motor series has been proposed in order to make possible an early affirmation of integrity of motor paths. POPULATION AND METHODS: Eight hundred and seventy three infants including 371 preterms had been admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit from 1990 to 1992. Then, they were examined as outpatients by a multidisciplinary team. They were especially tested for lateral support on right and left superior limbs, alternately, and for lateral abduction reaction of each hip. RESULTS: Absence of manifestations of CP was noted in 87% of infants with a corrected age of 4 months; a correct prediction of future normal walking was made for all babies. Both tests could not be correctly performed by those babies who lately developed manifestations of CP. CONCLUSIONS: These two simple tests appear to be accurate to early predict normality.