ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Infectious disease (ID) advice is a major part of antimicrobial stewardship programs. The objective of this study was to assess general practitioners' (GPs)' opinions and compliance with advice given by ID hotlines. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter survey was based on the 7-day assessment of initial advice requested by GPs to a hotline set up by volunteer hospital ID teams to record advice for 3 years. The primary endpoint was the GPs' satisfaction with the advice given by ID specialists. RESULTS: Ten ID teams participated in the study and recorded 4138 requests for advice, of which 1325 requests included a proposal for antibiotic therapy and justified a follow-up call at seven days. Only 398 follow-up calls (30%) were carried out because many GPs were not reachable. GPs were very satisfied with ID hotlines: 58% considered them indispensable and 38% very useful. The recommendations provided by ID specialists were followed by GPs in more than 80% of cases. The two main motivations for GPs to call the hotline were to get quick advice (86%) and to receive help in managing a patient (76%). CONCLUSIONS: The ID telephone consultations and advice systems for GPs are highly appreciated and are effective in terms of following the recommendations.
Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases , General Practitioners , Humans , Hotlines , Communicable Diseases/drug therapy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Primary Health CareABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To date, there has been no consensus concerning the vascular approach during sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease. The aim of this study was to determine the functional impact of elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy performed with high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery for diverticulitis in consecutive male patients. METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients of median age 53 years were enrolled in a prospective single-centre pilot study at a tertiary teaching hospital. Main outcome measures were functional results. Patients were asked to complete standardized, validated questionnaires to evaluate preoperative and 6 months postoperative bowel symptomatology (Jorge-Wexner Incontinence Score and KESS score), urinary function (IPSS), and sexual function (IIEF). Secondary outcomes were surgical data, morbidity, and quality of life (SF-36). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between preoperative and 6 months postoperative total scores for bowel symptomatology, urinary function, and sexual function. There were no perioperative deaths. The morbidity rate was 12% including three minor and no major events. Quality of life demonstrated statistically better general health (p < 0.01) and better medical status over the prior 4 weeks at 6 months after surgery, compared to baseline. This single-centre prospective study has a limited number of patients, relatively short follow-up time, and includes only male patients. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic sigmoidectomy with high tie of the inferior mesenteric artery for diverticular disease does not induce functional disorders at 6 months after surgery. The benefit of the operation for quality of life is even greater for general health and medical status.
Subject(s)
Diverticular Diseases , Diverticulitis, Colonic , Laparoscopy , Colectomy , Colon, Sigmoid/surgery , Diverticular Diseases/surgery , Diverticulitis, Colonic/surgery , Humans , Male , Mesenteric Artery, Inferior/surgery , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To date, the decision to set up therapeutic extra-corporeal life support (ECLS) in hypothermia-related cardiac arrest is based on the potassium value only. However, no information is available about how the analysis should be performed. Our goal was to compare intra-individual variation in serum potassium values depending on the sampling site and analytical technique in hypothermia-related cardiac arrests. METHODS: Adult patients with suspected hypothermia-related refractory cardiac arrest, admitted to three hospitals with ECLS facilities were included. Blood samples were obtained from the femoral vein, a peripheral vein and the femoral artery. Serum potassium was analysed using blood gas (BGA) and clinical laboratory analysis (CL). RESULTS: Of the 15 consecutive patients included, 12 met the principal criteria, and 5 (33%) survived. The difference in average potassium values between sites or analytical method used was ≤1 mmol/L. The agreement between potassium values according to the three different sampling sites was poor. The ranges of the differences in potassium using BGA measurement were - 1.6 to + 1.7 mmol/L; - 1.18 to + 2.7 mmol/L and - 0.87 to + 2 mmol/L when comparing respectively central venous and peripheral venous, central venous and arterial, and peripheral venous and arterial potassium. CONCLUSIONS: We found important and clinically relevant variability in potassium values between sampling sites. Clinical decisions should not rely on one biological indicator. However, according to our results, the site of lowest potassium, and therefore the preferred site for a single potassium sampling is central venous blood. The use of multivariable prediction tools may help to mitigate the risks inherent in the limits of potassium measurement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03096561.
Subject(s)
Diagnostic Tests, Routine/standards , Heart Arrest/etiology , Heart Arrest/therapy , Hypothermia/complications , Potassium/blood , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Blood Gas Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Potassium Deficiency , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is a well-established treatment for motor complications in Parkinson disease (PD). Since 2012, the nonrechargeable dual-channel neurostimulator available in France seems to have shorter battery longevity compared to the same manufacturer's previous model. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the battery longevity of older and more recent neurostimulators from the same manufacturer and to explore factors associated with battery life variations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied our cohort of PD patients who underwent STN DBS between 1987 and 2017. We collected data concerning neurostimulator replacements and parameters. We compared the survival of the first device available, Kinetra® and the current one, Activa-PC® (Medtronic Inc.) and estimated the factors that had an impact on battery longevity through a Cox logistic regression. RESULTS: Three hundred sixty-four PD patients received a total of 654 DBS STN neurostimulators: 317 Kinetra® and 337 Activa-PC®. The survival analysis, using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, showed a difference between the curves of the two devices (log-rank test; pâ¯<â¯0.001). The median survival of an Activa-PC® neurostimulator was 1666 days, while it was 2379 days for a Kinetra®. After adjustment, according to the multivariate analysis, the main factors associated with battery lifetime were: the neurostimulator type; the number of subsequent neurostimulator implantations; the total electrical energy delivered (TEED); and sex. CONCLUSION: The Kinetra® neurostimulator lifetime is 2.5 years longer than the Activa-PC®. The type of the device, the high TEED and the number of subsequent neurostimulator implantations influence battery longevity most. These results have medical-economic implications since the survival of PD patients with DBS increases over years.
Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation/trends , Electric Power Supplies/trends , Implantable Neurostimulators/trends , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Subthalamic Nucleus/physiology , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Deep Brain Stimulation/instrumentation , Electrodes, Implanted/trends , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Parkinson Disease/diagnosis , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Analyzing mortality in a mature trauma system is useful to improve quality of care of severe trauma patients. Standardization of error reporting can be done using the classification of the Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO). The aim of our study was to describe preventable deaths in our trauma system and to classify errors according to the JCAHO taxonomy. METHODS: We performed a six-year retrospective study using the registry of the Northern French Alps trauma network (TRENAU). Consecutive patients who died in the prehospital field or within their stay at hospital were included. An adjudication committee analyzed deaths to identify preventable or potentially preventable deaths from 2009 to 2014. All errors were classified using the JCAHO taxonomy. RESULTS: Within the study period, 503 deaths were reported among 7484 consecutive severe trauma patients (overall mortality equal to 6.7%). Seventy-two (14%) deaths were judged as potentially preventable and 36 (7%) deaths as preventable. Using the JACHO taxonomy, 170 errors were reported. These errors were detected both in the prehospital setting and in the hospital phase. Most were related to clinical performance of physicians and consisted of rule-based or knowledge based failures. Prevention or mitigation of errors required an improvement of communication among caregivers. CONCLUSIONS: Standardization of error reporting is the first step to improve the efficiency of trauma systems. Preventable deaths are frequently related to clinical performance in the early phase of trauma management. Universal strategies are necessary to prevent or mitigate these errors.
Subject(s)
Medical Errors/mortality , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data , Wounds and Injuries/mortality , Adult , Aged , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , France/epidemiology , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Male , Medical Errors/classification , Medical Errors/prevention & control , Medical Errors/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Mortality, Premature/trends , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Statistics, Nonparametric , Time FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To describe the disability status of non-selected hospitalized persons. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey to assess activity limitations of every person older than 18 years hospitalized in a regional university hospital covering all medical fields. Evaluators rated, on a scale from 0 to 4, 22 selected items of the International Classification of Functioning (ICF), covering the 6 following domains: learning and applying knowledge, general tasks and demands, communication, mobility, self-care, and interpersonal interactions and relationships. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to analyze the prevalence, severity and profile of the handicap in terms of sociodemographic characteristics and care pathways. RESULTS: Among 1572 eligible persons, 1267 (81%) were surveyed (mean age 62.7±20.4years; 655 males [51.7%]). Overall, 82% showed at least one activity limitation. For 52%, disability was severe or total for at least one ICF item. Prevalence of disabilities was higher for mobility (75%) and self-care domains (63%). Disability was strongly related to age: age older than 80years versus 18 to 44years (OR=12.8 95% CI 6.4-27.9]; P<0.01). Disability was associated with hospitalization in rehabilitation units (96%; OR=4.3 [95% CI 2.2-5.3]; P<0.01). Severe disability was associated with hospitalization in critical care units (OR=6.7 [CI 3.2-15.1]; P<0.001) and psychiatry units (OR=5.3 [CI 2.7-11.4]; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Handicap was common in hospitalized persons, involving all 6 tested ICF activity domains, particularly mobility and self-care. This study alerts care givers, hospital administrators, and in general, people influencing health policies about the need to plan actions to reduce activity limitations of hospitalized persons, whatever the cause of the hospitalization.
Subject(s)
Disability Evaluation , Disabled Persons , Inpatients , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hospital Departments , Humans , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Multiprofessionnal teams in primary care are developing in many countries including France. These groups appear very heterogeneous regarding the level of integration and interprofessional cooperation. A systematic review of the literature was performed to screen the instruments which assess the organizational development of primary care groups. METHODS: Scientific literature was searched in the Pubmed database, gray literature was searched for on the Internet. The documents were selected by two independent investigators. The collected data included information on assessment instruments: origin, content, method of use, and validation process. RESULTS: Sixty-five documents involving 16 assessment instruments were selected for the study. Twelve instruments have been developed in North America and 4 in Europe. Four instruments were evaluation questionnaires, 4 accreditation tools and 8 were maturity matrices. The maturity matrices were structured by levels of organizational development. Their use were effected by an individual self-assessment of each professional and then by consensus of the group in the presence of an external facilitator. The questionnaire and accreditation tools have organizations and use patterns variable. The number of questions ranged from 25 to 200 with a median of 80. The instruments were organized into 4 to 16 dimensions with a median of 7. Six common themes were identified: practice and staff management, quality development, data patient management, interprofessional cooperation, accessibility and continuity of care, and formation. The validation process of tools were variable and often incomplete. CONCLUSION: The set of assessment tools for primary care group is heterogeneous in purpose, content and mode of use. However, common themes were found for all tools. An evaluation questionnaire, in French, would be useful to monitor over time and evaluate the organizational development of centers and health houses in France.
Subject(s)
Health Care Surveys/methods , Patient Care Team/standards , Primary Health Care/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods , France/epidemiology , Health Care Surveys/standards , Health Services/standards , Humans , Patient Care Team/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To characterize the indications of primary cesarean sections and discuss the various possibilities to reduce them. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study, carried out over a period of 1 year in a university hospital having a level 3 perinatal activity, including the 499 primary cesarean sections of 2013. Two groups were defined by parity: nulliparous patients (group 1) and multiparous patients who had never previously been delivered by cesarean section (group 2). We have assessed the indication of every primary cesarean section and health status of newborns in each group. RESULTS: Groups 1 and 2 respectively included 369 and 130 patients. The cesarean section rate in 2013 was 24.7% with a primary cesarean section rate of 17%. Seventy-four percent of the primary caesarean deliveries were performed on nulliparous women and 26% on multiparous (P<0.001). Sixty-three percent of the primary caesarean deliveries were performed on nulliparous women with a singleton fetus in cephalic presentation. The most common indications for primary cesarean delivery were non-reassuring fetal heart rate tracing (47.1%), failure to progress (24.8%) for which nulliparous women were more involved (29% vs. 13%, P<0.001) and fetal malpresentation (9.6%). CONCLUSION: Further analysis of fetal heart rate during labor, a larger use of second line means to evaluate the fetal status during labor, using 6cm as the cut off for active labor, and encouraging vaginal operative delivery constitute the best way to decrease the primary cesarean section rate.
Subject(s)
Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Heart Rate, Fetal , Hospitals, University/statistics & numerical data , Obstetric Labor Complications/epidemiology , Parity , Adult , Female , France , Humans , Obstetric Labor Complications/surgery , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
In infective endocarditis (IE), brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is helpful to diagnose clinically silent neurological events. We assessed the usefulness of systematic early brain MRI in IE diagnosis and medico-surgical management. Over a period of 1 year, all patients admitted in one of the three hospitals participating in and fulfilling the Duke criteria for definite or possible IE underwent cerebral MRI within 7 days of IE suspicion. Eight panels of experts analyzed the records a posteriori. For each case, one record with and one record without the MRI results were randomly assigned to two panels, which determined the theoretical diagnosis and treatment. Paired comparisons were performed using a symmetry test. Thirty-seven brain MRIs were performed within a median of 5 days after inclusion. MRI was pathological in 26 patients (70 %), showing 62 % microischemia and 58 % microbleeds. The expert advice did not differ significantly between the two evaluations (with or without the MRI results). The therapeutic strategies determined diverged in five cases (13.5 %). Diagnosis differed in two cases (5.4 %), with an upgrading of diagnosis from possible to definite IE using MRI results. Early brain MRI did not significantly affect the IE diagnosis and medico-surgical treatment plan. These results suggest that systematic use of early brain MRI is irrelevant in IE. Further studies are necessary to define whether MRI is mandatory in IE management within a multidisciplinary approach, with particular attention paid to better timing and the subset of patients in whom this imaging examination could be beneficial.
Subject(s)
Brain Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/methods , Endocarditis/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Angiography/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brain/pathology , Brain Diseases/pathology , Endocarditis/complications , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To define the optimal delay before inducing labor in the management of premature rupture of the membranes (PRM) at term with unfavourable cervix in order to reduce the risk of caesarean section as well as the risk of maternal and foetal infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of three homogeneous groups carried out over on a period of 4years in two centres. All the patients were included after premature rupture of membranes at term with unfavourable cervix (Bishop score<6). We defined three expected delays after PRM at term: less than 7h (group 1), between 7 and 12h (group 2) and more than 12h (group 3). We have assessed the obstetrical, maternal and foetal consequences for each group. RESULTS: Sixty patients were allocated in group 1, 49 in group 2 and 46 in group 3. There was no significant difference in the rate of caesarean between the three groups but it was lower in group 2: 6.1% versus 18.3% in group 1 and 21.7% in group 3. No statistical difference was observed concerning maternal or foetal infections. CONCLUSION: In PRM at term, neither our study nor literature data allow us to conclude about the optimal delay before inducing labor.
Subject(s)
Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture , Labor, Induced/methods , Adult , Cervix Uteri/physiopathology , Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Infections/complications , Infections/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Term Birth , Time FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To assess ultrasonographic cervical length measurement in predicting preterm labor without premature rupture of the membrane in twin pregnancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of 56 patients with preterm labor between 24+0 and 32+0 weeks. The judgment criteria was probability of delivery before 34 weeks in cases of spontaneous preterm labor before 32 weeks. RESULTS: The threshold of cervical length less than 20mm and 30mm respectively had a sensitivity of 42% and 94%, a specificity of 51% and 13%, a positive predictive value of 30% and 36% and a negative predictive value of 63% and 83% in predicting delivery before 34 weeks. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length is not a predictive of preterm delivery in twin pregnancies with preterm labor. However, the high negative predictive value allows to reassure the patient and to avoid hospitalization as well as tocolysis in cases where cervical length is superior or equal to 30mm.