Pros and cons of TNF inhibitors and tocilizumab in the treatment of large-vessel vasculitis.

Large-vessel vasculitides (LVVs) include giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu's arteritis (TAK). Even if similar, these two entities differ in terms of treatment and outcomes.High doses of glucocorticoids (GCs) are still the first choice for the treatment of both conditions. However, adjunctive therapies are recommended in selected patients in order to decrease the risk of relapse and the amount of side effects related to GCs. Tumour necrosis factor α inhibitors (TNFis) and tocilizumab (TCZ) are used for the treatment of LVVs, with some differences. In GCA, TCZ has been proved to be effective and safe in inducing remission with some open questions still remaining, whereas data about TNFis are scarce and non-conclusive. On the contrary, in TAK either TNFis or TCZ seem to be able to control symptoms and angiographic progression in refractory forms.However, their place in the management of treatment must still be clarified, and as a result the American College of Rheumatology and EULAR guidelines slightly differ in the recommendations about when and what treatment to start. Thus, the aim of this review is to look at the evidence on the use of TNFis and TCZ in LVVs, outlining the pros and cons of both therapies.

Reactogenicity, safety and disease flares following BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in patients with chronic immune-inflammatory arthritis treated with biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs.

OBJECTIVES: The safety of COVID-19 vaccination in rheumatic patients treated with biological (b) and targeted synthetic (ts) disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) remains poorly explored. METHODS: Reactogenicity, safety and disease flares following each of the two doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine was evaluated in 186 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and spondyloarthritis treated with b/tsDMARDs, who discontinued anti-rheumatic treatments around vaccination. A group of 53 healthy controls was used for comparison. RESULTS: The frequency and severity of systemic events was similar to that reported in the general population, and no particular safety concerns emerged. The use of methotrexate reduced systemic reactogenicity (adjORs [95% CI] 0.49 [0.25-0.94] and 0.63 [0.32-0.99] after each vaccine dose), whilst no specific effects of different b/tsDMARDs were seen. Flares around vaccination were reported by 24.5% of the patients. Factors associated with flares were active disease (adjORs [95% CI] 2.8 [1.01-8.09] and 1.86 [0.99-6.03] after each vaccine dose) and use of JAKi (adjORs [95% CI] 3.96 [1.39-11.27] and 3.10 [0.99-7.85]). The percentage of cases requiring change or increase in DMARD therapy due to persistent worsening of disease activity at follow-up visits was low (3.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The safety of mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in arthritis patients on treatment with b/tsDMARDs is reassuring. In a regimen of peri-vaccine drug interruption, transient flares of the disease more commonly occur in association with active arthritis and use of shorter half-life drugs. Most flares do not require treatment escalation or change.

Ultrasound halo sign as a potential monitoring tool for patients with giant cell arteritis: a prospective analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the sensitivity to change of ultrasound halo features and their association with disease activity and glucocorticoid (GC) treatment in patients with newly diagnosed giant cell arteritis (GCA). METHODS: Prospective study of patients with ultrasound-confirmed GCA who underwent serial ultrasound assessments of the temporal artery (TA) and axillary artery (AX) at fixed time points. The number of segments with halo and maximum halo intima-media thickness (IMT) was recorded. Time points in which >80% of patients were assessed were considered for analysis. Halo features at disease presentation and first relapse were compared. RESULTS: 49 patients were assessed at 354 visits. Halo sensitivity to change was assessed at weeks 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 and showed a significant standardised mean difference between all time points and baseline for the TA halo features but only after week 6 for the AX halo features. The number of TA segments with halo and sum and maximum TA halo IMT showed a significant correlation with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (0.41, 0.44 and 0.48), C reactive protein (0.34, 0.39 and 0.41), Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (0.29, 0.36 and 0.35) and GC cumulative dose (-0.34, -0.37 and -0.32); no significant correlation was found for the AX halo features. Halo sign was present in 94% of first disease relapses but with a lower mean number of segments with halo and sum of halo IMT compared with disease onset (2.93±1.59 mm vs 4.85±1.51 mm, p=0.0012; 2.01±1.13 mm vs 4.49±1.95 mm, p=0.0012). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound is a useful imaging tool to assess disease activity and response to treatment in patients with GCA.

Novel Therapies for ANCA-associated Vasculitis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to discuss the most recent evidence on the treatment innovations and future prospective in the management of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides (AAVs). RECENT FINDINGS: In AAV, a growing body of research is available on novel treatment options for remission induction and to clarify some uncertainties concerning the optimal use of available drugs. Efforts are being made to reduce the toxicity associated with high-dose, prolonged glucocorticoids (GC) regimens. Despite major advances in the prognosis of AAV, relapses are still common and the intensity and duration of remission treatment constitute a great challenge in the management of these chronic conditions. A paradigm shift in practice in the management of AAV is being supported by recent evidence suggesting the comparable efficacy and improved safety profile of schemes with a reduced dose of GC for the induction and maintenance of remission in patients with severe granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) or microscopic polyangiitis (MPA). Moreover, recent appraisal of pathogenetic mechanisms, including complement activation pathways, has introduced the revolutionary concept of an alternative to GC, such as avacopan. Plasma exchange failed to prevent end-stage renal disease and mortality in patients with severe renal involvement or pulmonary haemorrhage according to a large multicentre randomised trial. Intensified immunosuppressive strategies for patients with life-threatening manifestations, including the combination of rituximab (RTX) with cyclophosphamide (CYC) have revealed promising preliminary data. New evidence for the use of alternative immunosuppressive agents (e.g. mycophenolate mofetil or abatacept) for the induction of remission in patients with non-severe disease is emerging. Several studies have been recently published, or are ongoing, to assess the optimal strategy and duration of maintenance of remission with the available treatment options (GC, azathioprine, and RTX). Preliminary evidence supports the superiority of a more prolonged course of maintenance treatment. The management of refractory or relapsing eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) has been improved by the recent demonstration of efficacy and safety of an interleukin-5 inhibitor, mepolizumab. Ongoing randomised studies will clarify the role of RTX in patients with severe manifestations of EGPA.

Tocilizumab for Treatment of Severe COVID-19 Patients: Preliminary Results from SMAtteo COvid19 REgistry (SMACORE).

Objective: This study aimed to assess the role of Tocilizumab therapy (TCZ) in terms of ICU admission and mortality rate of critically ill patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Design: Patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were prospectively enrolled in SMAtteo COvid19 REgistry (SMACORE). A retrospective analysis of patients treated with TCZ matched using propensity score to patients treated with Standard Of Care (SOC) was conducted. Setting: The study was conducted at IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Hospital, Pavia, Italy, from March 14, 2020 to March 27, 2020. Participants: Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 hospitalized in our institution at the time of TCZ availability. Interventions: TCZ was administered to 21 patients. The first administration was 8 mg/kg (up to a maximum 800 mg per dose) of Tocilizumab intravenously, repeated after 12 h if no side effects were reported after the first dose. Main Outcomes and Measures: ICU admission and 7-day mortality rate. Secondary outcomes included clinical and laboratory data. Results: There were 112 patients evaluated (82 were male and 30 were female, with a median age of 63.55 years). Using propensity scores, the 21 patients who received TCZ were matched to 21 patients who received SOC (a combination of hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin and prophylactic dose of low weight heparin). No adverse event was detected following TCZ administration. This study found that treatment with TCZ did not significantly affect ICU admission (OR 0.11; 95% CI between 0.00 and 3.38; p = 0.22) or 7-day mortality rate (OR 0.78; 95% CI between 0.06 and 9.34; p = 0.84) when compared with SOC. Analysis of laboratory measures showed significant interactions between time and treatment regarding C-Reactive Protein (CRP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), platelets and international normalized ratio (INR) levels. Variation in lymphocytes count was observed over time, irrespective of treatment. Conclusions: TCZ administration did not reduce ICU admission or mortality rate in a cohort of 21 patients. Additional data are needed to understand the effect(s) of TCZ in treating patients diagnosed with COVID-19.